Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T09:41:36.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

John Stanley (1713–1786)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Extract

No period of English music is in greater need of revaluation than the 18th century. Its history has yet to be written. In general there is a complete lack of biographical and critical literature. Documents and letters are practically non-existent. Work remains uncollected and judgments are still based on 19th century estimates, which were founded upon insufficient knowledge and less understanding. Until recently most new editions of the period attempted to fit the 18th century view-point into a 19th century canon, and they were not only stylistically bad but often texturally incorrect. The revival of any unfamiliar work of the period was, and still is, too often greeted with patronising disparagement or remarks about the superiority of Handel. That these composers were not of the stature of Handel can never be denied; but we should remember Francis Quarles's “if he cannot bring a cedar let him bring a shrub.” That they were individuals, with styles of their own, was perfectly clear to their contemporaries and is equally clear to us today once we penetrate the common language of their age sufficiently to understand the varying intonations of those who used it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 24 note * Concerto No. 1 in D, Concerto No. 2 in B minor, Concerto No. 3 in G. Boosey & Hawkes.

page 26 note * Hinrichsen Edition.