Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Schizophrenia practice guidelines: International survey and comparison

  • Wolfgang Gaebel (a1), Stefan Weinmann (a2), Norman Sartorius (a3), Wolfgang Rutz (a4) and John S. McIntyre (a5)...
Abstract
Background

Schizophrenia guidelines differ considerably in methodology and content.

Aims

To systematically compare national schizophrenia guidelines from different countries.

Method

An international survey was conducted on guideline development and a methodological comparison was made using a validated guideline appraisal instrument (the Appraisal Guideline Research and Evaluation Europe).

Results

The methodological quality of many schizophrenia guidelines was at best moderate. Few guidelines had included key stakeholders in their development process. Although pharmacotherapy recommendations were similar, there were strong variations in the type of psychosocial interventions recommended.

Conclusions

The methodological quality of guidelines has a strong influence on their applicability However, the lack of financial means to develop and implement guidelines is a serious problem. Independent international organisations could contribute to defining a core set of unbiased schizophrenia treatment recommendations. In countries with a shortage of resources, this could be a basis for adaptation to different cultural and economic backgrounds in collaboration with stakeholders.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Schizophrenia practice guidelines: International survey and comparison
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Schizophrenia practice guidelines: International survey and comparison
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Schizophrenia practice guidelines: International survey and comparison
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Professor Wolfgang Gaebel, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Bergische Landstrasse 2, D-40629 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail: Wolfgang.Gaebel@uni-duesseldorf.de
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of interest

WG. is one of the editors of the German schizophrenia guideline (from 1998); J. M. is the Chairman of the US Steering Committee on Practice Guidelines. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
AGREE Collaboration (2003) Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12, 1823.
Aldrich, R., Kemp, L., Williams, J. S., et al (2003) Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 327, 12831285.
American Psychiatric Association (1997) Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 163.
Apiquian, R., Fresan, A., Fuente-Sandoval, C., et al (2004) Survey on schizophrenia treatment in Mexico: perception and antipsychotic prescription patterns. Biomed Central Psychiatry, 4, 12.
Buitelaar, J. K., van Ewijk, W. M., Harms, H. H., et al (1998) Antipsychoticagebruik bij Schizofrene Psychosen. Amsterdam: Nederlands Vereiniging voor Psychiatrie.
Canadian Psychiatric Association (1999) Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43 (suppl. 2), 25S40S.
Colléage des Médecins du Québec (1999) Treating Schizophrenia. http://www.cmq.org/uploadedFiles/lignestraitementschizophrenieang99.pdf
Expert Consensus Panel (2003) Expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64 (suppl. 12), 297.
Gaebel, W. Falkai, P. (eds) (1998) Behandlungsleitlinie Schizophrenie. Darmstadt: Steinkopff.
Goldberg, D., Sharp, D. & Nanayakkara, K. (1995) The field trial of the mental disorders section of ICD-10 designed for primary care (ICD10-PHC) in England. Family Practice, 12, 466473.
Grimshaw, J. M., Thomas, R. E., Maclennan, G., et al (2004) Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment, 8, 172.
Hamilton, S. H., Revicki, D. A., Edgell, E. T., et al (1999) Clinical and economic outcomes of olanzapine compared with haloperidol for schizophrenia. Results from a randomised clinical trial. Pharmacoeconomics, 15, 469480.
Hayward, R. S., Wilson, M. C., Tunis, S. R., et al (1995) Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence Based Medicine Work Group. JAMA, 274, 570574.
Jablensky, A., Sartorius, N., Ernberg, G., et al (1992) Schizophrenia: manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A World Health Organization ten-country study. Psychological Medicine Monograph Supplement, 20, 197.
Katschnig, H., Donat, H., Fleischhacker, W. W., et al (2002) 4x8 Empfehlungen zur Behandlung von Schizophrenie. Linz: Edition Pro Mente.
Kovess, V., Caroli, F., Durocher, A., et al (1994) Stratégies Thérapeutiques á Long Terme dans les Psychoses Schizophréniques. Paris: Agence National d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé, Edition Frison-Roche.
Latvijas Psihiatru Asiciacijas (2001) Sizofrenijas Racionalas Farmakoterpijas Rekomendacijas zalu legades Kompensacijas Sistema. Rija: Latvian Psychiatric Society.
Lehman, A. F. & Steinwachs, D. M. (1998) Transllating research into practice: the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) treatment recommendations. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 110.
Lehman, A. F., Lieberman, J. A., Dixon, L. B., et al (2004) Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, second edition. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, I56.
Libiger, J. (1999) Akutní psychotická epizoda. In Psychiatrie. Doporucnene Postupy Psychiatrické Pécne (Psychiatry, Appropriate Psychiatric Care) (ed. Raboch, J.). Prague: Galen. http://www.cls.cz/dp/2002/t285.rtf
Lietuvos Respublikos Sveikatos Apsaugos Ministro (2002) Sizofrenijos ir Afektiniu Sutrikiku Gydymo Metodika. Vilnius: Lithuanian Ministry of Health.
Marder, S. R., Essock, S. M., Miller, A. L., et al (2002) The Mount Sinai conference on the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 28, 516.
McGorry, P., Killackey, E., Elkins, K., et al (2003) Summary Australasian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline for the treatment of schizophrenia 2003. Australasian Psychiatry, 11, 136147.
McIntyre, J. S. (2002) Usefulness and limitations of treatment of guidelines in psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 1, 186189.
Miller, A. L., Chiles, J. A., Chiles, J. K., et al (1999) The Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) schizophrenia algorithms. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60, 649657.
Milner, K. K. & Valenstein, M. (2002) A comparison of guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 53, 888890.
Murray, C. J. L. & Lopez, A. D. (eds) (1996) The Global Burden of Disease. A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2002) Clinical Guideline I. Schizophrenia: Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care. London: NICE.
Nordentoft, M., Kelstrup, A., Garde, K., et al (2001) God Socialpsykiatrisk Standard i Behandling of Unge og Voksne Med Skizofreni. Denmark: Dansk Psykiatrisk Selskab. (http://www.dadlnet.dk/klaringsrapporter/2001-06/2001-06.htm).
Patel, V. & Andrade, C. (2003) Pharmacological treatment of severe psychiatric disorders in the developing world: lessons from India. CNS Drugs, 17, 10711080.
Rutz, W. (2003) The European WHO mental health programme and the World Health Report 2001: input and implications. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 7374.
Salokangas, R. K. R. (ed.) (2001) Skitsofrenia. Käypä Hoito-Suositus. Duodecim, 117, 26402657. (http://www.duodecim.fi/kh).
Sartorius, N., Fleischhacker, W. W., Gjerris, A., et al (2003) The usefulness and use of second-generation antipsychotic medications – an update. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 16, S1S44.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (1998) Psychosocial Interventions in the Management of Schizophrenia. Edinburgh: SIGN (http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sign/index.html).
Singapore Ministry of Health (2003) Schizophrenia. Clinical Practice Guideline. Singapore: Ministry of Health (http://www.moh.gov.sg/cmaweb/attachments/publication/281cda5elb4e/cpg-schizophrenia.pdf).
Sociedad Espanola de Psiquiatria (2000) Consenso Espahol de Expertos para Recomendaciónde Actuación en el Tratamiento de la Esquizofrenia. Madrid: Sociedad Espanola de Psiquiatria (http://sepsiq.org/Pub/ExpEsq/ExpEsq-1.pdf).
Statens Helsetilsyn (2003) Schizofreni. Kliniske Retningslinjer for Utredning og Behandling. Oslo: Norwegian Psychiatric Association and Health Ministry
Stein, D. J., Seedat, S., Niehaus, D. J. H., et al (2000) Psychiatric Medications in Primary Care: Algorithms and Guidelines. Cape Town: University of Stellenbosch.
World Health Organization (1996) Diagnostic and Management Guidelines for Mental Disorders in Primary Care: ICD-10 Chapter V Primary Care Version. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
Zmitek, A., Tavcar, R., Kocmur, M., et al (2000) Shizofrenija. Priporocila in Smernice za zdradvljenje z zdravili. Ljubljana: Psychiatric Collegium.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Schizophrenia practice guidelines: International survey and comparison

  • Wolfgang Gaebel (a1), Stefan Weinmann (a2), Norman Sartorius (a3), Wolfgang Rutz (a4) and John S. McIntyre (a5)...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *