Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mzfmx Total loading time: 0.399 Render date: 2022-08-12T23:07:26.193Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Understanding the suicidal brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

C. Van Heeringen*
Affiliation:
Unit for Suicide Research, University Hospital Gent, Belgium
A. Marušic
Affiliation:
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
*
Professor C. Van Heeringen, University Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Tel: +32 (0)9 240 4375; fax: +32 (0)9 240 4989; e-mail: cornelis.vanheeringen@rug.ac.be
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

It has been suggested that the key to preventing suicide is not in the study of the brain, but in the direct study of the human emotions (Shneidman, 1996). However, recent advances in neuroscience are providing support for a theory of human emotions that implicates increasingly well-defined brain regions (Reference Stuss, Gallup and AlexanderStuss et al, 2001). The frontal lobes appear to be essential, with the right frontal lobe having a central role in the neural network for social cognition, including inferences about feelings of others. The ventral medial frontal regions are also important, possibly through their connections with the amygdala and other limbic structures which give them a key role in the neural network for behavioural modulation based upon emotion and drives (Reference PhillipsPhillips, 2003). It has been difficult to dissociate social cognitive processes from the behavioural expression of these processes, but insights are rapidly increasing based upon recent neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies.

Brain regions shown to be involved in suicidal behaviour constitute what may be called the ‘suicidal brain’. Moreover, the current state of knowledge of neuropsychological and cognitive psychological aspects of suicidal behaviour allows for a description of the roles of these areas in the development of suicidal ideation and behaviour, and more particularly for a dissociation of the social cognitive processes and the behavioural expression of these processes. It is now clear that these brain structures contribute to the trait-like characteristics that constitute the vulnerability to suicidal behaviour.

SUICIDE RISK: FROM BODY TO BRAIN

One can show that there is an association between brain dysfunction and suicidal behaviour by comparing the risk of suicide behaviour in various groups of physical disorders. The risk of suicide increases the nearer the disorder or dysfunction is to the brain. When compared with the general population, suicide risk is doubled in people with disorders such as diabetes and cancer, approximately five times greater in people with peripheral neurological disorders (e.g. 2–7 times greater in multiple sclerosis and 4–9 times greater in spinal cord lesions) and more than five times greater in people with central neurological disorders such as stroke and epilepsy (particularly treatment-resistant epilepsy: 25 times) (Reference Stenager, Stenager, Hawton and van HeeringenStenager & Stenager, 2000).

The prevalence of mental disorders, being strongly associated with an increased risk of suicidal behaviour, also increases as the primary location of the disorder or dysfunction moves closer to the brain. However, this probably does not explain sufficiently the association between brain dysfunction and the occurrence of suicidal behaviour. Indeed, certain personality traits that are also involved in the development of suicidal behaviour (e.g. emotional lability, impulsivity and aggressivity) are found in ascending order of frequency in the general population, those who are physically ill (e.g. hostility in coronary disease) and those with brain disorders (e.g. personality changes in epilepsy or brain injury).

COGNITION AND THE SUICIDAL BRAIN

Knowledge about the state of mind of suicidal individuals remains limited. Although thoughts and attitudes around the time of a suicidal act may predict future suicidal behaviour (Reference Beck, Brown and SteerBeck et al, 1999), relatively little is known about the most basic aspects of cognitive processing in suicidal individuals. However, impaired cognitive functioning in psychiatric disorders for which suicide risk is elevated is now well documented (Reference Mann, Waternaux and HaasMann et al, 1999), and insight into the cognitive characteristics of suicidal individuals is increasing (Reference Williams, Pollock and van HeeringenWilliams & Pollock, 2001). It has thus become clear that three characteristics differentiate people with depression who are suicidal from people with depression who are not. These characteristics include:

  1. (a) a sensitivity to particular life events reflecting signals of defeat, based on attentional biases (‘perceptual popout’) leading to involuntary hypersensitivity to stimuli signalling ‘loser’ status;

  2. (b) the sense of being trapped, which is related to an insufficient capacity to solve problems, commonly of an interpersonal or social nature;

  3. (c) the absence of rescue factors, mediated by deficient prospective cognitive processes and leading to feelings of hopelessness.

Although the involvement of these cognitive characteristics in the development of suicidal behaviour has been shown consistently, little is known about their neural basis.

With regard to sensitivity to life events, early studies focused on the hypothesis that a generalised cognitive rigidity mediates the relationship between stressful life events and suicidal behaviour. However, more recent findings are consistent with the possibility that among people with depression those who attempt suicide differ from those who do not on some but not all neuropsychological tests (Reference King, Conwell and CoxKing et al, 2000). Using a modified Stroop task, Becker et al (Reference Becker, Strohbach and Rinck1999) found that the level of suicidal ideation in people with depression correlated particularly with biases in selective attention. Another study could not demonstrate any difference in attention measures between suicide attempters and non-attempters in a group of people with depression (Reference Keilp, Sackeim and BrodskyKeilp et al, 2001). Although clearly much more research is needed, these findings suggest a role of attentional bias in the development of suicidal ideation – but not suicidal behaviour – in people with depression.

Williams & Pollock (Reference Williams, Pollock and van Heeringen2001) have convincingly argued with regard to the second characteristic that the sense of being trapped is associated with trait-dependent deficiencies in problem-solving skills, which in turn appear to depend upon deficits in autobiographical memory. Several studies have shown an association between attempted suicide and overgeneral autobiographical memory (Reference Evans, Williams and O'LoughlinEvans et al, 1992; Reference Sidley, Whitaker and CalamSidley et al, 1997). These studies indicate that overgeneral autobiographical recall (probably mediated by the frontal lobes) affects suicidal behaviour by its effect on the ability to recall specific memories among people who attempt suicide, which correlates positively with the effectiveness of the solutions suggested for solving hypothetical social problems.

With regard to the third cognitive characteristic, the relatively new research approach addressing prospective cognition may well be useful. One study (Reference Audenaert, Goethals and Van LaereAudenaert et al, 2002) but not another (Reference McLeod, Rose and WilliamsMcLeod et al, 1993) found differences between those who had attempted suicide and a nondepressed control group using a neutral fluency task. By using a modified fluency test it was recently demonstrated that participants who had attempted suicide were less fluent in coming up with positive events that might happen in the future. Moreover, hopelessness – which is a core psychopathological characteristic in association with suicidal behaviour – was found to correlate significantly with the lack of generating future positive events and not with an excessive anticipation of negative things in the future (Reference Williams, Pollock and van HeeringenWilliams & Pollock, 2001). Using a split-dose activation paradigm with the Verbal Fluency Test we recently showed a blunted increase in prefrontal blood flow in the brains of people who had attempted suicide when compared with a healthy control group (Reference Audenaert, Goethals and Van LaereAudenaert et al, 2002).

It thus appears that these three core cognitive psychological characteristics are associated with biases in neuropsychological functioning in terms of attention, memory and fluency, respectively.

Neural substrate of suicidal cognitive processes

Recent neurobiological findings converge to a substantial level with this cognitive and neuropsychological approach, leading to insights into the dissociation of social cognitive processes from behavioural expression involved in suicidal behaviour (Reference DeakinDeakin, 1996; Reference Van HeeringenVan Heeringen, 2001). The social cognitive component is thought to be modulated by the frontal and temporal cortices in conjunction with the hippocampus, and mediated by the serotonin (5-HT)1A and noradrenalin neurotransmission systems. Sensitivity to social stimuli (measured by means of the personality dimension reward dependence, supposedly mediated by the noradrenergic system) strongly correlates with the activation of the stress system in those who attempt suicide by violent means (Reference Van Heeringen, Audenaert and Van de WieleVan Heeringen et al, 2000). A second component addresses executive functions, which may be modulated by the prefrontal cortex in conjunction with the amygdala and mediated by 5-HT2A and dopamine, and comprise, among others, the abilities needed to achieve and maintain a problem-solving set – the second of the cognitive processes involved in suicidal behaviour described above.

Suicidal behaviour occurs at the crossroads of the past (recent with regard to precipitating stressors, and more distant with regard to its effect on our resilience against these stressors) and the future (or at least the way it is perceived on the basis of previous experiences). The frontal lobes are responsible for the integration of sensations, perceptions, consciousness and memory into organised and planned behaviours (Reference FusterFuster, 1997), and the prefrontal cortex thus also mediates prospective cognitive processes. In vivo functional neuroimaging recently demonstrated that suicidal behaviour is associated with a decreased binding potential of prefrontal 5-HT2A receptors, which in turn correlates significantly with increased levels of hopelessness and of behavioural inhibition (Reference Van Heeringen, Audenaert and Van LaereVan Heeringen et al, 2003). In a similar way it appears that dysfunctional attitudes, i.e. negatively biased views of oneself, the world and the future, are associated with cortical 5-HT2 binding (Reference Meyer, McMain and KennedyMeyer et al, 2003). It thus appears that the third cognitive process involved in suicidal behaviour, as described above, is associated with a decreased serotonergic functioning in the prefrontal cortex, which may become manifest as increased levels of hopelessness and behavioural inhibition following exposure to adverse circumstances. Based on these findings it can be hypothesised that increased behavioural inhibition (i.e. anxiety-based avoidance) is the primary mechanism involved, which might lead to suicidal behaviour only in the presence of a (dopamine-driven?) force, which is strong enough to break through this inhibition and which might manifest itself as hostility or aggression. This may explain the association between serotonergic dysfunction and impulsivity or dysregulation of aggression, as found in post-mortem studies of those who have died by suicide (Reference Mann, Waternaux and HaasMann et al, 1999). Although this has been recently questioned, particularly with regard to the 5-HT2A system (Reference De Deurwaerdère and SpampinatoDe Deurwaerdère & Spampinato, 1999), serotonin acts in an antagonistic way to dopamine, so that a depletion of serotonin might indeed disinhibit aggressive behaviour.

There is thus increasing evidence that the suicidal brain comprises different (connected) cortical and subcortical brain structures, which constitute the social cognitive and behavioural expressive components of the predisposition for suicidal behaviour. Insight into the neuropsychological basis and neurobiological modulation of these components is increasing. Evidence can be found for a role of social cognitive processes (a sensitivity to particular social circumstances) and the behavioural expression of these processes (due to a dysregulation of anxiety and/or aggression). The dissection of the predisposition for suicidal behaviour in the components as described above is supported by studies of the neurobiological modulation of neuropsychological functions. For instance, attention level is related to noradrenalin release (Reference Kodama, Honda and WatanabeKodama et al, 2002), and drugs that influence 5-HT1A function (such as buspirone) selectively affect performance on neuropsychological tests of memory and learning without affecting executive functions; the reverse appears to be the case for drugs that influence the 5-HT2 system (Reference DeakinDeakin, 1996). Animal studies have shown that a balance between (hippocampal) 5-HT1A and (cortical) 5-HT2 functioning is essential for an adequate response to social stress (Reference McKittrick, Blanchard and BlanchardMcKittrick et al, 1995). Further research is needed to study the relevance of such findings to the understanding of the suicidal brain. Moreover, the effects of state-dependent conditions (such as those associated with the increased stress response or with excessive alcohol intake) on serotonergic neural activity requires further study, because of their potential influence on the course of the suicidal process (Reference Van HeeringenVan Heeringen, 2001).

Although the proposed model of the predisposition to suicidal behaviour most probably is to be regarded as simplistic, the complexity of the cortico-subcortical circuits involved in the different components of the predisposition to suicidal behaviour, their neuropsychological expression and their neurobiological modulation may well reflect the complexity of predicting and treating suicidal ideation and behaviour.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

Audenaert, K. Goethals, I. Van Laere, K. et al (2002) SPECT neuropsychological activation procedure with the Verbal Fluency Test in attempted suicide patients. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 23, 907916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. T. Brown, G. K. Steer, R. A. et al (1999) Suicide ideation at its worst point: a predictor of eventual suicide in psychiatric outpatients. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 29, 19.Google ScholarPubMed
Becker, E. S. Strohbach, D. & Rinck, M. (1999) A specific attentional bias in suicide attempters. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 18, 730735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, J. F. W. (1996) 5-HT, antidepressant drugs and the psychosocial origins of depression. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 10, 3138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Deurwaerdère, P. & Spampinato, U. (1999) Role of serotonin 2A and serotonin2B/2C receptor subtypes in the control of accumbal and striatal dopamine release elicited in vivo by dorsal raphe nucleus electrical stimulation. Journal of Neurochemistry 73, 10331042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. Williams, J. M. G. O'Loughlin, S. et al (1992) Autobiographical memory and problem-solving strategies of parasuicide patients. Psychological Medicine, 22, 399405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuster, J. M. (1997) The Prefrontal Cortex: Anatomy, Physiology, and Neuropsychology of the Frontal Lobe (3rd edn). New York: Lippincott-Raven.Google Scholar
Keilp, J. G. Sackeim, H. A. Brodsky, B. S. et al (2001) Neuropsychological dysfunction in depressed suicide attempters. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 735741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, D. A. Conwell, Y. Cox, C. et al (2000) A neuropsychological comparison of depressed suicide attempters and non-attempters. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 12, 6470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodama, T. Honda, Y. Watanabe, M. et al (2002) Release of neurotransmitters in the monkey frontal cortex is related to level of attention. Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 56, 341342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. J. Waternaux, C. Haas, G. L. et al (1999) Toward a clinical model of suicidal behavior in psychiatric patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 181189.Google Scholar
McKittrick, C. R. Blanchard, R. J. Blanchard, B. S. et al (1995) Serotonin receptor binding in a colony model of chronic social stress. Biological Psychiatry, 37, 383396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, A. K. Rose, G. S. & Williams, J. M. G. (1993) Components of hopelessness about the future in parasuicide. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 441455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. H. McMain, S. Kennedy, S. H. et al (2003) Dysfunctional attitudes and 5-HT2 receptors during depression and self-harm. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 9099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, M. L. (2003) Understandingtheneurobiology of emotion perception: implications for psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 190192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneidman, E. S. (1996) The Suicidal Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sidley, G. L. Whitaker, K. Calam, R. M. et al (1997) The relationship between problem-solving and autobiographical memory in parasuicide patients. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 25, 195202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenager, E. N. & Stenager, E. (2000) Physical illness and suicidal behaviour. In The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Suicide (eds Hawton, K. & van Heeringen, C.), pp. 405421. Chichester: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuss, D. T. Gallup, G. & Alexander, M. P. (2001) The frontal lobes are necessary for ‘theory of mind’. Brain, 124, 279286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Heeringen, C. (2001) Understanding Suicidal Behaviour: The Suicidal Process Approach to Research, Treatment and Prevention. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Van Heeringen, C. Audenaert, K. Van de Wiele, L. et al (2000) Cortisol in violent suicidal behaviour: association with personality and monoaminergic activity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 60, 181189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Heeringen, C. Audenaert, K. Van Laere, K. et al (2003) Prefrontal 5-HT2a receptor binding potential, hopelessness and personality characteristics in attempted suicide patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 74, 149158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. M. G. & Pollock, L. (2001) Psychological aspects of the suicidal process. In Understanding Suicidal Behaviour: The Suicidal Process Approach to Research, Treatment and Prevention (ed. van Heeringen, C.), pp. 7694. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
23
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Understanding the suicidal brain
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Understanding the suicidal brain
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Understanding the suicidal brain
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *