Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T22:30:14.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sardou on the English Stage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2009

Extract

If by successful is meant widely performed, the most successful playwright in the English theatre between T. W. Robertson in the 1860s and A. W. Pinero in the 1890s was a Frenchman, Victorien Sardou. This apparent paradox can be elucidated not only by the list of English adaptations of Sardou which concludes this survey, but by noting some of the leading English actors who appeared in Sardou. They include Irving (Madame Sons-Gêne, Robespierre, Dante); the Bancrofts (Nos Intimes, Dora, Les Bourgeois de Pont-Arçy, Odette, Fédora); the Kendals (Les Pattes de Mouche, Nos Intimes, Dora, Maison Neuve); Wyndham (Rabagas, La Papillonne); Hare (Les Pattes de Mouche, Dora, La Tosca); Tree (Fédora); Forbes-Robertson (Dora, Les Bourgeois de Pont-Arçy); Hawtrey (Divorçons!); Bourchier (Divorçons!); Du Maurier (Dora). The admission to the list of such leading ladies as Ellen Terry, Mrs Patrick Campbell, Modjeska, Elizabeth Robins, and Gladys Cooper would extend it further.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Recollections of Sixty Years (1909), p. 218.Google Scholar

2. Hart, J. A.: Sardou and the Sardou Plays (1913), p. 90.Google Scholar A further acknowledgement is due to this work for many of the details of adaptations contained in the Checklist.

3. loc.cit.

4. Dame Madge Kendal by Herself (1933), p. 120.Google Scholar

5. The Drama of Yesterday and Today (1899), vol. I, p. 593.Google Scholar

6. ibid., pp. 592–3.

7. Diplomacy was never published. All references are to the MS submitted to the Lord Chamberlain for licensing, and now deposited in the British Museum.

8. op. cit., p. 593.Google Scholar

10. Bancroft, G. P., Stage and Bar (1939), p. 25.Google Scholar

11. The Theatre, New Series, vol. XXI, p. 60.Google Scholar

12. ibid.

13. The Queen's Proctor was never published. All references are to the MS submitted to the Lord Chamberlain for licensing, and now deposited in the British Museum.

14. Our Theatres in the Nineties (1932), vol. II, p. 151.Google Scholar