Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T01:49:45.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Implications for British Insurance, Particularly Long Term Business, of Joining the European Common Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2014

Get access

Synopsis

The European Economic Community (Common Market) was established by the Treaty of Rome signed by six countries, namely, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, in 1957.

Many of the eleven basic aims of the Treaty have some bearing on insurance business. The free movement of persons, services and capital is of the greatest technical interest to insurers but the measures designed to promote the economic growth of the Community which will include the expansion and improvement of capital markets could be of even greater interest—particularly to life assurers. Another aim of the Treaty, viz. to ensure fair competition within the Community, could act as a constraint on the introduction of liberalizing measures.

The general programme for the progressive establishment of the Common Market over a transitional period of 12 years (extended if necessary) included a specific timetable for the introduction of freedom of establishment and freedom of services in respect of insurance transactions. The implementation of this programme as it concerns insurance has fallen into arrears and only one of the five directives which were scheduled has so far been promulgated. Nevertheless, the achievement of the aims of the Treaty of Rome must eventually result in the gradual harmonization of legislation affecting insurance business within the member states. Chiefly because of the need to avoid any distortion of competition, the measures introduced are likely to apply to all insurers within the E.E.C. irrespective of whether they transact business in one or more member states.

It is premature to consider in detail the likely terms and conditions of the E.E.C. legislation as this is still a long way off. Insofar as the present pattern of insurance control legislation of most E.E.C. countries is more restrictive—particularly for long-term business—than in the United Kingdom, any short-term solution for harmonizing legislation would seem likely to involve British companies in more stringent rules. It is hoped that the E.E.C. will take into account the outcome of the discussions on similar issues which have taken place over the last decade within international organizations such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Comité Européen des Assurances on which the United Kingdom is represented. E.E.C. thinking may also be influenced in the direction of the progressive liberalization of insurance control legislation by the record of life assurance business in the United Kingdom and by the need to encourage the development of capital markets to which life assurance is an important contributor as a source of long-term and regular savings. Thus the ultimate pattern of E.E.C. legislation may well reflect the British system of freedom, provided such a system is well presented within the E.E.C. negotiations. Generally, problems for the British actuary will arise from the imposition of new rules within the E.E.C. not only for insurance transactions but for the many other commercial transactions with which the actuary is professionally interested as advisor or participant.

Special areas of long-term business such as pension schemes; life reassurance; equity-linked contracts and private sickness insurance are described. Last but not least, in connexion with the introduction of freedom of mobility of labour, it may be necessary to consider to what extent actuarial qualifications earned in another member country can be recognized as enabling an actuary to practise in the United Kingdom.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammeter, Hans. The problem of solvency in life assurance. J.I.A. vol. 92, p. 193.Google Scholar
Department of Economic Affairs and the Central Office of Information, H.M.S.O., May 1967. Britain and the E.E.C.—The Economic Background.Google Scholar
Economic and Financial Affairs, Series No. 7, 1969. Report on the Contribution of Pension Funds to the Capital Markets of the E.E.C.Google Scholar
European Communities, Press and Information services. Revised edition, July 1970. The Common Market and the common man—Social policy and working and living conditions in the European Community.Google Scholar
Foster, G. T.Some observations on life reassurance. J.I.A. vol. 72, p. 337.Google Scholar
H.M. Government, July 1971. The United Kingdom and the European Communities. H.M.S.O. Cmnd. 47 15.Google Scholar
Isles, I.Life Assurance and the European organizations. J.S.S. vol. 17, p. 490.Google Scholar
Moss, D. G. A. and Wood, S. F.The Common Market. J.J.S. vol. 17, p. 64.Google Scholar
National Reports to the 17th International Congress of Actuaries, 1964. The development of the actuarial profession.Google Scholar
Noble Lowndes International Ltd., 1970. A Guide to Social Security in Western Europe.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, A. R. N.State and private pension schemes in the European Economic Community and the United Kingdom. J.I.A. vol. 89, p. 157.Google Scholar
Report of a group of experts appointed by the E.E.C. Commission, 1966. The development of a European Capital Market.Google Scholar
Skerman, R. S.The application of actuarial principles to the transaction of overseas life business. J.I.A. vol. 83, p. 73.Google Scholar
Skerman, R. S.A solvency standard for life assurance business. J.I.A. vol. 92, p. 75.Google Scholar
Skerman, R. S. Presidential Address. October 1970.Google Scholar
Study by the Insurance Committee O.E.C.D. Supervision of Private Insurance in Europe.Google Scholar
Subject 3 of the 18th International Congress of Actuaries, 1968. The interdependence of funding and investment in life assurance and pension funds.Google Scholar
Vliebergh, R. Solvency criteria for life assurance. Royal Association of Belgian Actuaries, Bulletin, No. 65.Google Scholar