Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T06:04:54.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Catholic, Anglican or Puritan? Edward Sackville, Fourth Earl of Dorset and the Ambiguities of Religion in Early Stuart England*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

David L. Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The religion of Edward Sackville, fourth earl of Dorset, foxed his contemporaries, and he has proved an equally slippery customer for those modern historians who wish to see unbridgeable confessional gulfs opening up in the 1620s and 1630s. A detailed study of him reveals ambiguities of position that confused his contemporaries and confound modern categorisation. Those who knew Dorset differed dramatically in their perception of his religion. To one French ambassador, Tillières, he was ‘un puritain’; while to William Middleton, Lord Fielding's chaplain, he appeared ‘strong for Precisians’. By contrast, another French ambassador, Fontenay, believed that Dorset ‘n’est pas trop ennemy de nostre religion' and the papal agent Carlo Rossetti thought him ‘assai fautori nell’ intrinseco dei Cattolicci’. In 1641 Sir Walter Erle even opposed the re-enfranchisement of Seaford on the grounds that ‘the lord of the town [i.e. Dorset] [was] a papist'. Dorset was called everything from a puritan to a papist—and other things besides. In dedicating his ‘account of religion by reason’ to Dorset, Sir John Suckling wrote that the tract—which was widely condemned as Socinian—‘had like to make me an atheist at Court and your lordship no very good Christian’. Whereas Professor Hexter addressed ‘the problem of the Presbyterian-Independents’, contemporary images of Dorset present the even more bizarre spectacle of a puritan-papist-pagan. Where, that is, they mention his religion at all. For time and again we find that descriptions focus mainly on Dorset's courtly and chivalric qualities. Clarendon portrayed Dorset as ‘a man of an obliging nature, much honour, of great generosity, and of most entire fidelity to the Crown’; but made no mention of his religious attitudes. When authors dedicated their writings to Dorset they consistently highlighted these same secular traits: Sir Richard Baker praised his ‘publicke vertues’, Edward May his ‘noble nature’; and even John Bastwick called him simply ‘illustrissimus’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 2 , December 1992 , pp. 105 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dorset became a Privy Councillor in 1626 and Lord Chamberlain to Queen Henrietta Maria in 1628. During the Civil War he was a moderate Royalist. For a full-length study, see Smith, David L., ‘The Political Career of Edward Sackville, fourth Earl of Dorset (1590–1652)’ (unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar. For detailed analyses of the successive stages of his career, see also idem ‘The fourth Earl of Dorset and the politics of the 1620s’, Historical Research, LXV (1992), 37—53Google Scholar; idem ‘The fourth Earl of Dorset and the Personal Rule of Charles I’, J[oumal] [of] B[rithh] S[tudies], XXX (1991), 257—87; idem ‘”The more posed and wise advice”: the fourth Earl of Dorset and the English Civil Wars’, H[istorical] J[ournal], XXXIV (1991), 797–829.

2 See, for example, Tyacke, N., Anti-Calvinists: The Rise of English Arminianism, c. 1590–1640 (Oxford, 1987), esp. chapters 6–8Google Scholar; and Sommerville, J. P., Politics and Ideology in England, 1603–1640 (Harlow, 1986), esp. chapter 6Google Scholar.

3 P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice], PRO 31/3/55 (Baschet's transcripts), unfol.: Tillières to Puisieux, 12 July 1621.

4 Quoted in Prynne, William, Canterburies Doome (1646), 429–30Google Scholar. I owe this reference to Anthony Milton.

5 P.R.O., PRO 31/3/66, fo. 162V: Fontenay to Bouthillier, Aug. 1630.

6 P. R. O., PRO 31/9/19 (transcripts from Rome archives), fo. 9r: Rossetti to Barberini, 7 Sept. 1640.

7 The Journal of Sir Simonds D'Ewes from the beginning of the Long Parliament to the opening of the trial of the Earl of Strafford ed. Notestein, W. (New Haven, 1923), 321–2Google Scholar.

8 ”The Works of Sir John Suckling, ed. Thompson, A. H. (1910), 341Google Scholar. For the charge of Socinianism, see also P.R.O., S.P. 16/429/38 (Secretary Windebanke's notes, 27 Sept. 1639). The broad and narrow senses of this term are discussed in Trevor-Roper, H. R., Catholics, Anglicans and Puritans (1987), 186–92Google Scholar.

9 J. H. Hexter, ‘The Problem of the Presbyterian Independents’, reprinted in his Reappraisals in History (1961), 163–84.

10 Hyde, Edward, Earl of Clarendon, The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England, ed. Macray, W. D. (6 vols, Oxford, 1888), I, 75–6 (Book I, 129–31)Google Scholar.

11 Baker, Richard, Meditations and Disquisitions upon the One and Fiftieth Psalme of David (1638), sig. 3[v]Google Scholar; May, Edward, A most certaine and true Relation of a strange monster or serpent found in the left ventricle of the heart of John Pennant, gentleman, of the age of twenty-one yeares (1639), sig. A2[v]Google Scholar; Bastwick, J., ΠΡΑΞΕΙΣ ΤΩΝ 0395;ΠΙΣΚΟΠΩΝ, Sive Apologetkus ad Praesules Anglicanos (1636), 178Google Scholar.

12 Howell, James, Ah, ha; Tumulus, Thalamus: Two Counter-Poems (1654)Google Scholar, sig. A (B[ritish] L[ibrary], E 228/1).

13 The diary of Ralph Josselin, 1616–1683, ed. Macfarlane, A. (1976)Google Scholar; Hughes, A., ‘Thomas Dugard and His Circle in the 1630s–a ”Parliamentary-Puritan” Connexion?’, H. J., XXIX (1986), 771–93Google Scholar; J. Fielding, “Opposition to the Personal Rule of Charles I: the Diary of Robert Woodford, 1637–41”, ibid. XXXI (1988), 769–88.

14 K[ent] A[rchives] O[ffice], Sackville MS, U 269/83/5.

15 See esp. Tyacke, , Anti-Cahinists, 3, 12, 21, 89, 115, 191, 193, 215Google Scholar; also Fletcher, A., A County Community in Peace and War: Sussex, 1600–1660 (1975), 63–4Google Scholar.

16 For the first point, see Scarisbrick, J. J., The Reformation and the English People (Oxford, 1984), esp. 10Google Scholar; for the second, Alsop, J. D., ‘Religious preambles in early modern English wills as formulae’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, XL (1989), 19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 K.A.O., Sackville MS, U 269/T837/5, fo. Ir.

18 K.A.O., Sackville MS, U 269/T83/5, fo. 8r. For the religious beliefs of Compton and Middlemore, see Fletcher, , Sussex, 97–8, 100Google Scholar.

19 Compton lived at Brambletye, near East Grinstead: Fletcher, , Sussex, 28, 97Google Scholar. Middle-more lived at Rotherfield: ibid., 56.

20 B. L., Harl. MS 1233 (misc. collections), fo. 91V.

21 P.R.O., S.P. 12/274/75 (R. Cooke to Mary Goche, 9 Mar. 1599/1600).

22 E[ast] S[ussex] R[ecord] O[ffice], Add. MS 5729/15 (indenture of 27 May 1628).

23 See, for example, E.S.R.O., G 23/4 (indenture of 1 June 1618); B.L., Add. Charter 9290 (indenture of 15 July 1629).

24 K.A.O., Sackville MS, U 269/L4 (papers relating to the destruction of Dorset House, 1666).

25 P.R.O., S.P. 16/183/58 (depositions concerning the smashing of a stained-glass window in St Edmund's Church, Salisbury, Jan. 1630/1), fo. 112v.

26 The most reliable text of Dorset's speech at Sherfield's trial is that in Bod[leian] Lib[rary], MS Tanner 299 (Archbishop Sancroft's transcripts), fos. 116V–117V, from which the following quotations are taken.

27 Sherfield's activities in Salisbury are analysed in Slack, P., ‘Poverty and Politics in Salisbury, 1597–1666’, in Crisis and Order in English Towns, 1500–1700, ed. Clark, P. and Slack, P. (1972), 164–203, esp. 183–7, 191Google Scholar.

28 Bod. lib., MS Tanner 299, fos. 121v–122r. For Laud's speech, see ibid. fos. 111v–115V.

29 B.L., Add. MS 64905 (Coke papers), fo. 117r–v: draft letter from Sir John Coke to the bishop of Salisbury, 15 Feb. 1632–3, with amendments in Charles I's hand. I owe this reference to Kevin Sharpe.

30 B. L., Egerton MS 784 (William Whiteway's diary), fo. 94r.

31 The warrant for Prynne's arrest, dated 1 Feb. 1632/3, was signed by eight Privy Councillors, including Dorset, : C[ommons] J[oumal], II, 124Google Scholar. Prynne later claimed that Dorset ‘was the chiefe meanes of helping [him] into prison’: Hampshire Record Office, Jervoise of Herriard Park MS, 44 M69/XXXIX/88: Prynne to Henry Sherfield, 12 Oct. 1633. I owe this last reference to John Adamson.

32 The fullest and most reliable text of Dorset's speech at Prynne's first trial is that in Bod. Lib., MS Tanner 299, fos. 130V–131r, from which the following quotations are taken.

33 This time, the final sentence was marginally less severe than Dorset advocated: Prynne was fined £5,000, pilloried, and had his ears cropped. See House of Lords Record Office, Main Papers, 20 Aug. 1644 (petition of William Prynne).

34 The lecturer was John Brinsley the younger, a prolific writer whose works are listed in Wing, B 4705–4737. The main documents relating to this episode are printed in Swinden, H., The History and Antiquities of Great Yarmouth (Norwich, 1772), 826–56Google Scholar. The bailiffs' letter to Dorset is found at 847–8. See also Palmer, C. J., The History of Great Yarmouth (2 vols, 1854–1856), II, 158–64Google Scholar; and Cust, R., ‘Anti-Puritanism and Urban Politics: Charles I and Great Yarmouth’, H. J., XXXV, 1–26Google Scholar.

35 Bod. Lib., MS Tanner 134 (diocese of Norwich papers), fo. 189r: the dean and chapter of Norwich to Dorset, [?] Dec. 1631.

36 Ibid., fo. 184r: the dean and chapter of Norwich to the bishop of Norwich, [?] 1632.

37 Palmer, , Great Yarmouth, II, 162Google Scholar; P.R.O., PC 2/41 (Privy Council register), 481.

38 Cust, , ‘Anti-Puritanism and Urban Polities’, 20, 24–5Google Scholar.

39 Croft, P., ‘The Religion of Robert Cecil’, H. J., XXXIV (1991), 773–96Google Scholar; I.J. Atherton, ‘Viscount Scudamore's Laudianism: the Religious Practices of the First Viscount Scudamore’, ibid. 567–96.

40 These details about the chapel at Knole are derived from Phillips, C. J., History of the Sackville Family (2 vols, 1930), II, 353–6, 433–4, 449Google Scholar; and Sackville-West, V., Knole and the Sackvilles (1922), 31–2Google Scholar.

41 For fragments of Dorset's accounts, see K.A.O., Sackville MS, U 269/A1/7–8; U 269/A41I/1–2. None of these contains any material relating to the chapels at either Knole or Dorset House.

42 It bears fruit in, for example, Cliffe, J. T., The Puritan Gentry (1984), esp. 135–8, 162–8Google Scholar.

43 See ‘The Correspondence of Bishop Brian Duppa and Sir Justinian Isham, 1650–1660’, ed. Isham, G., Publ. Northants. Rec. Soc., XVII (1955), xix–xxxiGoogle Scholar.

44 Fletcher, , Sussex, 81Google Scholar. See also ibid., 90–2; and Tyacke, , Anti-Calvinists, 206–7Google Scholar.

45 Laud, William, The History of the Troubles and Tryal of…William Laud (1695), 366Google Scholar.

46 Duppa was admitted to Christ Church on 9 July 1605: Alumni Oxonienses 1500–1714, ed. Foster, J. (4 vols, Oxford, 1891–1892), I, 434Google Scholar; Dorset on 26 July: ibid., IV, 1298.

47 Phillips, , Sacksilk Family, I, 274–5Google Scholar.

48 P.R.O., SO 3/11 (Signet Office docquet book), unfol., June 1638; [anon.,] Historical Notices of the Parish of Withyham in the County of Sussex (1857), 24–5; L.J., V, 80. I owe this last reference to John Adamson.

49 Donagan, B., ‘The clerical patronage of Robert Rich, 2nd Earl of Warwick, 1616–1642’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, CXX (1976), 388–419Google Scholar.

50 K.A.O., Sackville MS, U 269/Q1.

51 These certificates are found in P.R.O., E 331. The information about Dorset's presentations derived from them is laid out in Smith, ‘Dorset’, Appendix 2.

52 Guildhall Library, MS 9531/15 (register of the bishops of London). I owe this reference to Kenneth Fincham.

53 See above, 114.

54 Fletcher, , Sussex, 81Google Scholar.

55 B.L., Add. MS 15670 (procs of Cttee for Plundered Ministers), fo. 177r; C.J., III, 161; Matthews, A. G., Walker Revised (Oxford, 1948; repr., 1988), 54Google Scholar.

56 B. L., Add. MS 15671 (procs of Cttee for Plundered Ministers), fo. 216r. In 1657, Blundell received a payment from First Fruits: Shaw, W. A., A History of the English Church during the Civil Wars and under the Commonwealth (2 vols, 1900), II, 579Google Scholar. This suggests that his beliefs were again deemed acceptable under the Protectorate.

57 For Tillinghast's beliefs, see Nuttall, G. F., Visible Saints: The Congregational Way, 1640–1660 (Oxford, 1957), 147–8, 152–3Google Scholar; and Dictionary of National Biography, ed. Stephen, L. et al. (63 vols, 1885–1900), LVI, 871Google Scholar. I am grateful to Colin Davis for a discussion of Tillinghast's religious position.

58 P.R.O., S.P. 16/293/128 (Sir Nathaniel Brent's report of metropolitical visitation, 1635), fo. I5r–v.

59 For Gough, see B.L., Add. MS 15670, fos. 21v, 59r; Add. MS 15671, fo. 216r. Matthews, , Walker Revised, 356–7Google Scholar. For Sheppard, see Add. MS 15669 (procs of Cttee for Plundered Ministers), fo. 81r; Add. MS 15671, fos. 32V, 231r; P.R.O., S.P. 46/82, fo. 233r (receipt on Sheppard's behalf, 7 Mar. 1643/4); Matthews, , Walker Revised, 361Google Scholar.

60 For Sheppard, , see Al. Oxon., IV, 1344Google Scholar; for Baker, Robert, Alumni Cantabrigienses. Part One: from the earliest times to 1751, ed. , J. and Venn, J. A. (4 vols, Cambridge, 1922–1997), I, 72Google Scholar; for Rogers, Thomas, Al. Oxon., III, 1276Google Scholar; Al. Cant., III, 480. It is possible that Robert Man also held office after 1660: Al. Cant., III, 132.

61 Besides all the sources cited in the other notes to this paragraph, I have also checked the following: P.R.O., S.P. 22/1–3 (papers of Cttee for Plundered Ministers); Walker, J., An Account of the…Sufferings of the Clergy (1714)Google Scholar; Hennessy, G., Chichester Diocese Clergy Lists (1900)Google Scholar; Le Neve, John, Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae, 1541–1857, II (Chichester Diocese), comp. Horn, J. M. (1971)Google Scholar; Renshaw, W. C., ‘Some Clergy of the Archdeaconry of Lewes and South Mailing Deanery’, S[ussex] A[rchaeological] C[ollections], LV (1912), 220–77Google Scholar; ‘The Acts of Bishop Montague’, ed. Peckham, W. D., S.A. C, LXXXVI (1947), 141–54Google Scholar; Newcourt, R., Repertorium Ecclesiasticum Parochiale Londinense (2 vols, 1708–1710)Google Scholar; Argent, A., ‘Aspects of the Ecclesiastical History of the Parishes of the City of London, 1640–9’ (unpubl. PhD. diss., Univ. of London, 1983)Google Scholar; Smith, H., The Ecclesiastical History of Essex under the Long Parliament and Commonwealth (Colchester, 1932)Google Scholar.

62 No minister known to have been presented by Dorset appears in Calamy, E., An Account of the ministers … ejected or silenced, 1660–2 (2 vols, 1727)Google Scholar; or in Matthews, A. G., Calamy Revised (Oxford, 1934; repr., 1988)Google Scholar.

63 These seven were Kidder, Edward, Midleton, Anthony, Rogers, Thomas, Russell, Thomas, Thetcher, George, Tillinghast, John and Woods, Samuel: Al. Oxon. II, 848Google Scholar; III, 1276, 1292; IV, 1469, 1677; Al. Cant., III, 184, 480; IV, 242.

64 These two were, respectively, Man, Robert and Marsh, James: Al. Cant. III, 132, 144Google Scholar; Al. Oxon., III, 973.

65 For a similar pattern among those clergy who were ‘sequestered or harassed’ during the 1640s, see Green, I., ‘Career Prospects and Clerical Conformity in the early Stuart Church’, Past and Present XC (1981), 71–115, esp. 89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I owe this reference to Ian Atherton.

66 ‘Puritan’ is of course a highly complex term, covering a variety of different beliefs. Nevertheless, it remains useful as a general label for those people who disliked the traces of Catholicism in the late Tudor and early Stuart Church (such as bishops, vestments, and the Prayer Book), and who felt that the English Reformation was still incomplete. I use it in this sense throughout the present essay.

67 On Laud, see esp. McGee, J. S., ‘William Laud and the Outward Face of Religion’, in Leaders of the Reformation, ed. DeMolen, R. L. (1984), 318–44Google Scholar; on Neile, , Foster, A., ‘Church Policies of the 1630s’, in Conflict in Early Stuart England, ed. Cust, R. and Hughes, A. (Harlow, 1989), 193–223, esp. 198–201Google Scholar; on the feoffees for the purchase of impropriations, Activities of the Puritan Faction of the Church of England, 1625–33, ed. Calder, I. M. (1957)Google Scholar.

68 L. J., IV, 31. Cf. Foster, , ‘Church Policies’, 202Google Scholar.

69 B. L., Trumbull Add. MS 31 (misc. Trumbull papers), unfol.

70 The most reliable text of Dorset's speech at Williams's second trial is that in Bod. lib., MS Tanner 67 (letters and papers of 1638–9), fo. 91r, from which the following quotations aretaken.

71 Hacket, J., Scrinia Reserata: A Memorial Offer'd to the Great Deservings of John Williams, D. D. (1693), 131Google Scholar.

72 Rushworth, John, Historical Collections of private passages of State (8 vols, 1680–1701), II, ii, 1180Google Scholar; Bod. Lib., MS Eng. Hist. B 204 (Warcup papers), fos. 1r–v, 3r–v. I owe this last reference to John Adamson.

73 Mather, Cotton, Magnolia Christi Americana (1702), III, 18–19Google Scholar.

74 K.A.O., U[ncatalogued] C[ranfield] P[apers]: Dorset to the earl of Middlesex, 1 Oct. 1636.

75 Smuts, M., ‘The Puritan Followers of Henrietta Maria in the 1630s’, English Historical Review, XCIII (1978), 26–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hibbard, C., Charles I and the Popish Plot (Chapel Hill, N. C., 1983), 45, 60–4Google Scholar.

76 Cust, R., The Forced Loan and English Politics, 1626–1628 (Oxford, 1987), esp. 19–22, 209–12, 327–9Google Scholar; Lake, P., ‘Anti-Popery: the structure of a prejudice’, in Conflict, ed. Cust, and Hughes, , 72–106, esp. 84–5, 87, 90–1Google Scholar.

77 K.A.O., UCP: Dorset to the earl of Middlesex, [?] Sept. 1639.

78 B.L., Harl. MS 383 (letter book of Sir Simonds D'Ewes), fo. 185r: James Dee to Edmund Calamy, 25 Sept. 1640. I owe this reference to Peter Salt.

79 K.A.O., UCP: Dorset to the countess of Middlesex, [?] Aug. 1642.

80 Observations upon Religio Medici, occasionally written by Sir Kenelm Digby (1643), 2–3 (B. L., E 1113/4).

81 SirBrowne, Thomas, Religio Medici, ed. Denonain, J.-J. (2nd edition, Cambridge, 1955), 8Google Scholar.

82 Ibid.

83 Ibid., 9.

84 Lake, P., Anglicans and Puritans? Presbyterianism and English Conformist Thought from Whitgift to Hooker (1988), 6Google Scholar. Cf. Coolidge, John S., The Pauline Renaissance in England: Puritanism and the Bible (Oxford, 1970), esp. chapters 1–2Google Scholar. I owe this last reference to Richard Strier.

85 Lake, P., ‘The Calvinist Conformity of Robert Sanderson’, J.B.S., XXVII (1988), 81–116, esp. 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I am grateful to Conrad Russell for a discussion on this point.

86 P.R. O., S.P. 16/148/99 (Dorset to Viscount Dorchester, 30 Aug. 1629). See also S.P. 16/223/37 (Sir Kenelm Digby to Sir John Coke, 19 Sept. 1632); and New York Public Library, Morgan MS B (letter book of Sir Kenelm Digby), unfol.: Digby to Dorset, 14 June 1633; and Digby to [?] Dorset, 6 Oct. 1633. Digby's Catholicism is discussed in Foster, M., ‘Sir Kenelm Digby (1603–65) as Man of Religion and Thinker’ Downside Review, CVI (1988), 35–58, 101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

87 P.R. O., E 126/3 (Exchequer, King's Remembrancer, entry book of decrees and orders), fos. 159r–160r; E.S.R.O., SAS/P41 (indenture of 22 June 1630); Godfrey, W. H., ‘The High Street, Lewes’, S.A.C., XCIII (1955), 1–33, at 17Google Scholar.

88 For Amherst as a trustee for the third earl of Dorset's debts, see B. L., Add. MS 5701 (misc. Sussex collections), fos. 71r–76r. For the main Chancery cases, see P.R.O., C 2 Jas. I, D 14/44, an C 2 Chas. I, M 22/41 (Chancery procs). See also K.A.O., Sackville MS, U 269/L3 (exemplification of Chancery bill, 1625).

89 P.R.O., PROB 11 (Prerogative Court of Canterbury, copies of probated wills), 161/61; Fletcher, , Sussex, 63Google Scholar.

90 Smith, ‘Dorset and the politics of the 1620s’.

91 Fincham, K. and Lake, P., ‘The Ecclesiastical Policy of King James I’, J.B.S., XXIV (1985), 169–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Ibid.; the quotation is found at 187.

93 For this, see esp. Tyacke, Anti-Calvinists; Foster, ‘Church Policies’ and Davies, J., The Caroline Captivity of the Church (Oxford, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Smith, , ‘”The more posed and wise advice”’, 810Google Scholar.

95 See esp. the correspondence quoted in ibid., 809–12, 816–18.

96 Morrill, J. S., ‘The Religious Context of the English Civil War’, ante, 5th series, XXXIV (1984), 155–78, esp. 177Google Scholar.

97 Fletcher, A., The Outbreak of the English Civil War (1981), 124Google Scholar.

98 Cf. Kopperman, Paul E., Sir Robert Heath, 1575–1649: window on an age (1989), 194–200Google Scholar.