Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2010
The most detailed contemporary ethnographic representation of early nineteenth-century Ireland can be found in the reports produced by the Poor Inquiry of 1833–6. Despite their richness, however, these reports remained marginal to contemporary policy discussions and public debate. This is normally, and correctly, attributed to the unpopularity and impracticability of the specific recommendations of the Inquiry. This paper argues that the marginalisation of the reports was also due to their discursive originality. It focuses on the voluminous oral evidence which was collected and published by the Inquiry. This evidence was taken in public from large groups representing all social classes, and much of it was printed verbatim. This method was unique among state reports of the nineteenth century in the United Kingdom, and unusual in social discourse more generally. It emerged from an equally unusual conception of truth as social consensus, a theory which the Inquiry adopted in order to overcome what it saw as the socially fragmented nature of representation in Ireland.
1 Connell, K. H., Irish Peasant Society: Four Historical Essays (Oxford, 1968)Google Scholar, ch. 2: ‘Illegitimacy before the Famine’; Cullen, Mary, ‘Breadwinners and Providers: Women in the Household Economy of Labouring Families 1835–36’, in Women Surviving: Studies in Irish Women's History in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, ed. Luddy, Maria and Murphy, Cliona (Dublin, 1989), 85–116Google Scholar; Clarkson, L. A. and Crawford, E. Margaret, ‘Dietary Directions: A Topographical Survey of Irish Diet 1836’, in Economy and Society in Scotland and Ireland, 1500–1939, ed. Mitchison, Rosalind and Roebuck, Peter (Edinburgh, 1988), 171–92Google Scholar; Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing, iv (Cork, 2002), 847, 903, v (Cork, 2002), 522–4, 611, 835.
2 Gray, Peter, The Making of the Irish Poor Law 1815–43 (Manchester, 2009)Google Scholar.
3 Connaught Journal, 27 Mar. 1834; Thomas Bermingham, Remarks on the Proposed Poor Law Bill for Ireland (1838).
4 de Beaumont, Gustave, L'Irlande: sociale, politique et religieuse (Paris, 1843, orig. 1839), 179Google Scholar. This passage does not appear in the English translation published in 1839, and consequently not in the 2006 reprinting of that translation by Tom Garvin and Andreas Hess; Johnstone, Christian Isobel, True Tales of the Irish Peasantry as Related by Themselves (Edinburgh, 1836)Google Scholar; Louis Chevalier, Labouring Classes and Dangerous Classes in Paris during the First Half of the Nineteenth Century (1973, orig. 1958), 41–53; Smith, Sheila M., ‘Willenhall and Wodgate: Disraeli's Use of Blue Book Evidence’, Review of English Studies, 13 (1962), 368–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Patrick Bratlinger, The Spirit of Reform. British Literature and Politics 1832–67 (1977).
5 Frankel, Oz, States of Inquiry: Social Investigations and Print Culture in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the United States (Baltimore, 2006)Google Scholar.
6 John Revans, Evils of the State of Ireland, their Causes and Remedy: A Poor Law (1837).
7 Brian Earls, ‘Supernatural Legends in Nineteenth-Century Irish Writing’, Béaloideas: The Journal of the Folklore of Ireland Society, 60–1 (1992–3), 93–144.
8 First Report of the [Constabulary] Commissioners, HC 1839 xix; Carrickfergus Forgeries Committee, HC 1830–1 iii.
9 Harris, Michael, ‘Trials and Criminal Biographies: A Case Study in Distribution’, in Sale and Distribution of Books from 1700, ed. Myers, Robin and Harris, Michael (Oxford, 1982), 1–36Google Scholar; Tocqueville: œuvres complètes Tome iv, Vol.1, ed. Michelle Perrot (Paris, 1984), 333.
10 Royal Commission on Condition of Poorer Classes in Ireland (henceforth ‘Poor Inquiry’), Appendix A, HC 1835 xxxii, 496 (Mayo), 516 (Roscommon), 626 (Clare) Appendix D, 1836 xxxi, 14 (Sligo).
11 Poor Inquiry, 1st report, HC 1835 xxxii, vi–vii.
12 Ibid., x.
13 Gray, Making, 37–47.
14 Anthony Brundage, The Making of the New Poor Law, 1832–39 (1978), ch. 2, ‘The Royal Commission of Inquiry’.
15 Joseph-Marie, de Gérando, Baron, The Visitor of the Poor (Boston, MA, 1832), 15Google Scholar; Perrot, Michelle, ‘L'œil du baron ou le visiteur du pauvre’, in Michelle Perrot, Les ombres de l'histoire (Paris, 2001), 101–8Google Scholar.
16 Poor Inquiry, appendix B, 3.
17 James C. Scott, Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (1998).
18 Instructions to Assistant Commissioners, HC 1834 xliii.
19 Flanagan to Commissioners, 13 Jan. 1834, National Archives of Ireland, Chief Secretary's Office, Official Papers 1836/212.
20 Poor Inquiry, 1st report, vii.
21 Quoted in Mayo Constitution 3 Nov. 1834.
22 Poor Inquiry, 1st report, ix.
23 Selections of Parochial Examinations relative to the Destitute Classes in Ireland (1835).
24 Revans to Littleton, 5 Nov. 1834, N.A.I. C.S.O. O.P. 1834/4681.
25 Andrews, J. H., A Paper Landscape: The Ordnance Survey in Nineteenth-Century Ireland (Oxford, 1975), 119–21Google Scholar; D. H. Akenson, The Irish Education Experiment (1970), 235.
26 Habermas, Jürgen, On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction (Cambridge, 2001), 97–9Google Scholar; Habermas, Jurgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Cambridge, 1989, orig. 1962)Google Scholar.
27 Littleton to Duncannon, 8 Nov. 1834, Stafford Record Office, Hatherton papers (National Library of Ireland MS microfilm 3027).
28 Goldman, Lawrence, ‘The Origins of British “Social Science”: Political Economy, Natural Science and Statistics, 1830–1835’, Historical Journal, 26 (1983), 587–616CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Porter, Theodore M., The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900 (Princeton, 1986), 31–9Google Scholar.
29 Stocking, George, Victorian Anthropology (New York, 1987)Google Scholar; Revans, Evils, 111; ‘A Poor Law for Ireland’, Tait's Edinburgh Magazine, 4 (1837), 190.
30 Burke, Peter, Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe (Aldershot, 1978), 21–2Google Scholar; Wilson, William A., Folklore and Nationalism in Modern Finland (Bloomington, 1976), 25–61Google Scholar.
31 The Poor Inquiry is not mentioned in a recent survey of this literature, O'Connell, Helen, Ireland and the Fiction of Improvement (Oxford, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
