Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Tendler, Joseph
2013.
Opponents of the Annales School.
p.
121.
Article contents
Some Trends in Scholarship, 1868–1968, in the field of Medieval History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
Extract
Although the formation of our Society was not directly due to movements in the academic world, it did in fact take place shortly before a new epoch opened in English historiography. In 1868 the study of history as an academic discipline was non-existent in England save as part of a classical education. In that field those who seriously attempted to portray the ancient civilization were controlled by an austere literary tradition, and by the excellence and relatively small bulk of their sources. In addition to this, the work of the great Germans from Niebuhr to Mommsen penetrated to England long before Ranke and his seminar, or the early Monumentists, were known and imitated at Oxford and Cambridge. Consequently, the classical historians such as Thirlwall, Grote, Arnold and Finlay were far more sober, critical and quellenmässig than their contemporaries in English history. But they had no direct influence on historians in other fields or on academic practice, and they were all in a sense amateurs: Thirlwall was a bishop, Grote a banker, Finlay a man of private means and Arnold primarily a headmaster. In other fields of history the four principal names—and admittedly very great names—are of men who wrote either all or at least a principal part of their works as individuals at home and without academic position
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1969
References
page 140 note 1 For the historiography of the period 1815–50 in Germany almost the only work in English is still that of Gooch, G. P., History and Historians in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1913; 2nd edn, 1952).Google Scholar
page 140 note 2 For this see Knowles, D., ‘The Monumenta Germaniae Historica’, in Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5 ser., xi, 137–59Google Scholar, reprinted in Great Historical Enterprises (London, 1963), 64–97.Google Scholar
page 141 note 1 Douglas, D. C., English Scholars (London, 1939; 2 edn. 1951).Google Scholar
page 142 note 1 See N. J. Williams, ‘Stubbs’s Appointment as Regius Professor, 1866’, in Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, xxxiii (May, 1960), 121–25. Stubbs had applied for the Chichele chair in 1862, but had been passed over. In 1866 he refused to put in his name for the Regius chair.
page 142 note 2 For Stubbs, see also Cam, H. M., ‘Stubbs seventy years later’, in Cambridge Historical Journal, ix (1948), 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 142 note 3 Dockhorn, K., Der Deutsche Historismus in England (Göttingen, 1950), especially pp. 141–54.Google Scholar
page 142 note 4 Seventeen Lectures on the Study of Medieval and Modern History (Oxford, 1st edn, 1886), 40.Google Scholar
page 142 note 5 Ibid., 40.
page 143 note 1 Ibid., 382.
page 143 note 2 Ibid., 55.
page 143 note 3 The Constitutional History of England (Oxford, 1891), i, 12.Google Scholar
page 143 note 4 Seventeen Lectures, 13.
page 143 note 5 Ibid., 24.
page 146 note 1 Manchester, 6 vols., 1920–32.
page 146 note 2 The Medieval English Borough (Manchester, 1936).Google Scholar
page 148 note 1 Church and State in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 1913). The composition of these lectures dates from several years earlier.Google Scholar
page 148 note 2 R. W., and Carlyle, A. J., The History of Political Thought in the West (Edinburgh, 1903 ff.; 2nd/3rd edn, 1930–38, reprinted 1950). R. W. Carlyle left England for India as a young man, and took an active (and small) part in the enterprise only after retiring from a distinguished career. Nevertheless his brother loyally used the first person plural throughout.Google Scholar
page 150 note 1 Geschichte des kirchlichen Benefizialwesens, &c., vol. i (Berlin, 1895)Google Scholar. Die Eigenkirche als Element des mittelalterlich-germanischen Kirchenrechts (Berlin, 1895).Google Scholar
page 151 note 1 Besides his standard works on the conciliar epoch, N. Valois contributed articles of importance to the Histoire littéraire de la France.
page 151 note 2 La naissance de l’esprit laїque au declin du moyen âge (6 vols, S. Paul-Trois-Châeaux, 1934–46).
page 151 note 3 The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages (2nd edn, Powicke and Emden, 3 vols, Oxford, 1936).Google Scholar
page 151 note 4 Illustrations of... Medieval Thought and Learning (2nd edn, London, 1920, reprinted Cambridge, 1960).Google Scholar
page 152 note 1 In particular the late Fr Ph. Boehner, O.F.M., and Professor Heiko Obermann.
page 153 note 1 Historische Zeitschrift (v. Sybel), 1859; Revue Historique (Monod), 1876Google Scholar; Rivista Storica Italiana, 1884; English Historical Review (Acton and Creighton), 1886.Google Scholar
page 155 note 1 For a fuller treatment see Guggisberg, H. R., Das europäische Mittelalter in amerikanischen Geschichtsdenken des 19 und des frühen 20 Jahrhunderts (Basel & Stuttgart, 1964)Google Scholar. See also David, C. W., ‘American Historiography of the Middle Ages, 1884–1934’ in Speculum, x (1935), 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 156 note 1 The Renaissance of the Twelfth Century (Cambridge, Mass., 1927).Google Scholar
page 156 note 2 A History of Magic and Experimental Science during the first Thirteen Centuries of our Era (New York, 1923)Google Scholar; Science and Thought in the Fifteenth Century (New York, 1929).Google Scholar
page 156 note 3 New York, 1934–65.
page 156 note 4 The Sources and Literature of English History from the Earliest Times to about 1485 (London, 1900; 2nd edn, 1915). The first volume of a total revision of this work, by Professor Edgar B. Graves, sponsored by the Royal Historical Society and the Medieval Academy of America, should be in the press when these pages appear.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by