Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T10:35:43.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cervical Column Morphology and Craniofacial Profiles in Monozygotic Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Liselotte Sonnesen*
Affiliation:
Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark. lls@odont.ku.dk
Carsten Pallisgaard
Affiliation:
Clinic of Orthodontics, Aalborg Community Dental Service, Denmark.
Inger Kjær
Affiliation:
Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark.
*
*Address for correspondence: Liselotte Sonnesen, Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, 20 Nørre Allé, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Previous studies have described the relationships between cervical column morphology and craniofacial morphology. The aims of the present study were to describe cervical column morphology in 38 pairs of adult monozygotic (MZ) twins, and compare craniofacial morphology in twins with fusions with craniofacial morphology in twins without fusion. Visual assessment of cervical column morphology and cephalometric measurements of craniofacial morphology were performed on profile radiographs. In the cervical column, fusion between corpora of the second and third vertebrae was registered as fusion. In the twin group, 8 twin pairs had fusion of the cervical column in both individuals within the pair (sub-group A), 25 pairs had no fusions (subgroup B), and in 5 pairs, cervical column morphology was different within the pair (subgroup C), as one twin had fusion and the other did not. Comparison of craniofacial profiles showed a tendency to increased jaw retrognathia, larger cranial base angle, and larger mandibular inclination in subgroup A than in subgroup B. The same tendency was observed within subgroup C between the individual twins with fusion compared with those without fusion. These results confirm that cervical fusions and craniofacial morphology may be interrelated in twins when analysed on profile radiographs. The study also documents that differences in cervical column morphology can occur in individuals within a pair of MZ twins. It illustrates that differences in craniofacial morphology between individuals within a pair of MZ twins can be associated with cervical fusion.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008