Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T05:40:59.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The North of England Multiple Pregnancy Register: Five-Year Results of Data Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Martin P. Ward Platt*
Affiliation:
Regional Maternity Survey Office, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. m.p.ward-platt@ncl.ac.uk
Svetlana V. Glinianaia
Affiliation:
School of Population and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Judith Rankin
Affiliation:
School of Population and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Chris Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Marjorie Renwick
Affiliation:
Regional Maternity Survey Office, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
*
*Address for correspondence: Martin P. Ward Platt, Regional Maternity Survey Office, 25 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AA, UK.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From 1998 the population-based North of England Multiple Pregnancy Register (MPR) has collected data on all multiple pregnancies in the region from the earliest point of ascertainment in the pregnancy. This article describes the development of the MPR and the findings of the first 5 years of data collection. Mothers now give explicit consent for their inclusion with named data, in accordance with section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001. During 1998 to 2002, 2310 twin pregnancies were registered, with an increasing twinning rate of 13.6 to 16.6 per 1000 maternities. Chorionicity ascertainment in twin maternities with at least one stillbirth or live birth has improved from 81% in 1998 to 91% in 2002. Before 24 weeks of gestation, 8.4% (359/4620) of fetuses were lost either spontaneously or as a result of termination of pregnancy. The perinatal mortality rate was much higher in monochorionic than dichorionic twins, mainly due to differences in stillbirth rates (49.0 vs. 11.5 per 1000 maternities respectively, risk rate = 4.2; 95% confidence intervals 2.7–6.6). The gestational-age-specific neonatal mortality rates were similar in twins and singletons, except in the group of term births (≥37 weeks' gestation) when compared by conventional gestational age categories. For stillbirths, the rates were even lower than in singletons in gestational age categories of less than 32 weeks. The register is an important resource of data on multiple pregnancies, which allows monitoring of trends in multiple birth rates and pregnancy losses and provides a unique opportunity for etiological and long-term follow-up studies.

Type
Articles/United Kingdom
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006