Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:13:21.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diuron, Fenuron, Monuron, Neburon, and TCA Mixtures as Aquatic Herbicides in Fish Habitats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles R. Walker
Charles R. Walker*
Affiliation:
Missouri Conservation Commission, Fisheries Section, Columbia
Get access

Abstract

The substituted urea herbicides were rated according to their effectiveness as aquatic herbicides in this order: diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], monuron [3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], neburon [1-butyl-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methlyurea] and TCA(trichloroacetic acid) mixtures with them. They showed greatest potential in controlling certain aquatic plants in pre-emergence and early postemergence applications. However, relatively high concentrations were required to control filamentous algae (Cladophora, Pithophora and Spirogyra), chara (Chara), coontail (Ceratophyllum), naiad (Najas), and pondweeds (Potamogeton) for periods of time exceeding three months and up to three years. Granular formulations achieved better distribution of herbicides for control of rooted aquatic plants along the margins of lakes and ponds. Wettable powder and liquid emulsifiable concentrates were superior to granular formulations for the control of algae and emergent or floating aquatic plants.

Monuron and fenuron were less toxic to fish than were diuron and neburon. The TCA mixtures were somewhat more toxic than the simple ureas. Some species of fish were more sensitive than others and fingerlings more sensitive than adults of the same species. Fish-food organisms were reduced appreciably in plastic enclosures at herbicidal concentrations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1965 , pp. 297 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation. 1960. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Amer. Pub. Health Assoc, Inc., New York. 626 p.Google Scholar
2. Benson, N. G. and Conner, J. T. 1956. Use of CMU to control Najas . Prog. Fish Cult. 18:78–80.Google Scholar
3. Bucher, H. C. and Todd, C. W. 1951. 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea—A new herbicide. Science. 114:493.Google Scholar
4. Crafts, A. S. 1961. The chemistry and mode of herbicides. Inter-science Publishers, New York. 269 p.Google Scholar
5. DeBeer, B. J. 1945. The graphic calculation of bioassays. J. Pharm. Expt. Therap. 92:1–11.Google Scholar
6. Doudoroff, P., Anderson, B. G., Burdick, G. E., Galtsoff, P. G., Hart, W. B., Patrick, F., Strong, E. R., Surber, E. W., and Van Horn, W. M. 1951. Bioassay methods for the evaluation of acute toxicity of industrial wastes to fish. Sewage and Ind. Wastes, 23:1280–1397.Google Scholar
7. Hart, W. B., Doudoroff, P., and Greenbank, J. 1945. The evaluation of the toxicology of industrial wastes, chemicals, and other substances to fresh-water fishes. Waste Control Lab. Atlantic Refining Co. 317 p.Google Scholar
8. Litchfield, J. T. and Wilcoxon, F. 1949. A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J. Phar. Expt. Therap. 95:99–114.Google Scholar
9. Maloney, T. E. 1958. Control of algae with chlorophenyl dimethyl urea. J. Amer. Water Works Assoc., 50:417–422.Google Scholar
10. Palmer, C. M. and Maloney, T. E. 1955. Preliminary screening for potential algicides. Ohio J. Sci., 45:1.Google Scholar
11. van Overbeck, J. 1962. Physiological responses of plants to herbicides. Weeds 10:170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Walker, C. R. 1959. Control of certain aquatic weeds in Missouri farm ponds. Weeds 7:310–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Walker, C. R. 1961. Herbicide toxicity and ecology in Missouri fish ponds with reference to aquatic weed control. Proc NCWCC 17:30.Google Scholar
14. Walker, C. R. 1963. Toxicological effects of herbicides on the fish environment. Proc. 8th Air & Water Poll. Conf. Univ. Missouri Bull 64:17–34.Google Scholar
15. Walker, C. R. 1962. Aquatic weed control (1958–1962). Proc. NCWCC 19:125–126.Google Scholar
16. Walker, C. R. 1964. Simazine and other s-triazine compounds as aquatic herbicides in fish habitats. Weeds 12:134–139.Google Scholar
17. Welch, P. S. 1948. Limnological methods. The Blakiston Co., Philadelphia. 381 p.Google Scholar