Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T08:27:25.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Dicamba on Wheat and Wild Buckwheat at Various Stages of Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Paul C. Quimby Jr.
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University, Fargo
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University, Fargo
Get access

Abstract

The tolerances of wheat and wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus) to various rates of 2-methoxy-3,6-dichlorobenzoic acid (dicamba) were determined under field conditions and supplemented by studies with wheat in the growth chamber. Wheat height and yield were inversely proportional to rate, but response to various rates was dependent on stage of growth at application. Greatest reductions in wheat height and yield resulted from treatment at the late tiller and boot stages, respectively. The weight per 100 wheat seeds was increased from treatment at the boot and flower stages but was decreased at the early tiller stage.

The ratio of peduncle length: length of the flag leaf-sheath was decreased most from 24 oz/A applied preemergence and 12 oz/A applied at the late tiller stage.

Growth rate of wheat was decreased for a 2-week period after treatment. Excellent kill of wild buckwheat was observed from all rates applied through the 12- to 15-leaf stage of growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Friesen, George and Olson, P. J. 1953. The effect of 2,4-D on the developmental processes in barley and oats. Can. J. of Agr. Sci. 33:315329.Google Scholar
2. Friesen, H. A. 1963. Dicamba alone and in mixtures at various rates of application and stages of growth on Thatcher wheat. NCWCC Res. Rept. 20:28.Google Scholar
3. Helgeson, E. A., Blanchard, K. L., and Sibbitt, L. D. 1948. The effect of three 2,4-D compounds on yield and quality of North Dakota wheats. N. Dak. Farm Res. 10(5):166171.Google Scholar
4. Keys, C. H. 1962. The effect of Banvel-D on cereal crops as compared to 2,4-D. NCWCC Res. Rept. 19:43.Google Scholar
5. Klingman, D. L. 1953. Effects of varying rates of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T at different stages of growth on winter wheat. Agron. J. 45:606610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Olson, P. J., Zalik, Saul, Breakey, W. J., and Brown, D. A. 1951. Sensitivity of wheat and barley at different stages of growth to treatment with 2,4-D. Agron. J. 43:7783.Google Scholar
7. Skoglund, N. A. and Coupland, R. T. 1963. Response of wild buckwheat to several post-emergence herbicides. NCWCC Res. Rept. 20:2425.Google Scholar
8. Stevens, O. A. 1947. Studies on wild buckwheat. N. Dak. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 346.Google Scholar
9. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar