Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:28:06.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Science of Politics: New and Old

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Robert A. Dahl
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , April 1955 , pp. 479 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 To urge this focus would, of course, be to commit the same fallacy of “essences” mentioned above, but we are only concerned with Easton's criticism here.

2 E.g., Hempel, Carl, Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science, Chicago, I11., 1952.Google Scholar

3 I am not defending historicism or, for that matter, positivism. The question is as to the validity of Voegelin's New Science, not the validity of the views he attacks. One may logically conclude that both historicism and Voegelin's attack on it are false.