Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Garriga, Ana Carolina 2016. Regulatory lags, liberalization, and vulnerability to banking crises. Regulation & Governance, p. n/a.


    Kashyap, Ravi 2016. Hong Kong–Shanghai Connect/Hong Kong–Beijing Disconnect?Scaling the Great Wall of Chinese Securities Trading Costs. The Journal of Trading, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 81.


    Newman, Abraham and Posner, Elliot 2016. Transnational feedback, soft law, and preferences in global financial regulation. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 123.


    Centeno, Miguel Angel and Cohen, Joseph N. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.


    Goldbach, Roman 2015. Asymmetric influence in global banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 22, Issue. 6, p. 1087.


    Hall, Steven R. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.


    Reisenbichler, Alexander 2015. The domestic sources and power dynamics of regulatory networks: evidence from the financial stability forum. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 22, Issue. 5, p. 996.


    Grittersová, Jana 2014. Non-market cooperation and the variety of finance capitalism in advanced democracies. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 339.


    O'Faircheallaigh, Ciaran 2014. IR theory and domestic adoption of international norms. International Politics, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 155.


    Chwieroth, Jeffrey M. and Sinclair, Timothy J. 2013. How you stand depends on how we see: International capital mobility as social fact. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 457.


    Fini, Michael and Rethel, Lena 2013. Enacting the rules of global finance: sovereign wealth funds and the promotion of corporate governance reform. Asia Europe Journal, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 163.


    Centeno, Miguel A. and Cohen, Joseph N. 2012. The Arc of Neoliberalism. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 317.


    Dorn, Nicholas 2012. Knowing markets: would less be more?. Economy and Society, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 316.


    Delwaide, Jacobus 2011. The Return of the State?. European Review, Vol. 19, Issue. 01, p. 69.


    ×

The Political Economy of Global Finance Capital

  • Richard Deeg (a1) and Mary A. O'Sullivan (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990116
  • Published online: 01 August 2009
Abstract

The globalization of finance in recent years and the concurrent growth in the financial sector's influence, manifested most dramatically in the recent financial crisis, highlights the importance for political scientists of understanding the political economy of global finance. The authors review six important books that are representative of recent thinking by political scientists on the topic. They address the central questions that have been at the heart of the literature on global finance from its beginning in new and interesting ways. The most important developments highlighted in this article are the move from a predominant focus on state-centered patterns of regulation to the consideration of transnational governance regimes that mix public and private regulation; the effort to understand the causal forces that shape the political economy of global finance by allowing for an interaction among interests, institutions, and ideas; and giving increased attention to new sources of systemic risk in the global financial system, as well to the consequences for domestic politics of interactions with the global financial system. Notwithstanding the progress that has been made in coming to grips with the political economy of global finance, the authors highlight a number of questions that need to be addressed in future research. Although various nonstate actors have been recognized as important in the constitution of the rules of global finance, it is also necessary to understand the behavior of the actors who enact these rules. It is also important to generate evidence that forges some agreement on the causes of the globalization of finance, especially as the arguments made become more complex. Finally, there is a need for a more realistic assessment of the costs and benefits of financialization at the global and national levels. This last challenge is essential for a thorough understanding of the current global financial crisis.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×