Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:26:02.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consumer perception of poultry meat in Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

A. SISMANOGLOU*
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
I. TZIMITRA-KALOGIANNI
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Corresponding author: asismano@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The following review details the development and current status of poultry meat in terms of marketing, purchasing and consumer decisions within the country of Greece. The aim of this paper is to identify Greek consumers’ perceptions of poultry meat. Taking into account that little research has been conducted in the poultry sector in Greece generally and on consumer perceptions specifically, these results will help to provide solutions in strategic marketing.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ALOGOSKOUFIS, G. and BALTAS, N. (1991) Price and quantity adjustment in a dual character market: The case of the Greek poultry sector. Agricultural Economics 6: 79-89.Google Scholar
BOLLIGER, C. and REVIRON, S. (2008) Consumer Willingness to Pay for Swiss Chicken Meat: An In-store Survey to Link Stated and Revealed Buying Behaviour. 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists – EAAE 2008.Google Scholar
GSTRAUNTHALER, T. and DAY, R. (2008) Avian influenza in the UK: Knowledge, risk perception and risk reduction strategies. British Food Journal 110(3): 260-270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HSU, J.L., LIU, K.E., HUANG, M.H. and LEE, H.J. (2008) Consumer Knowledge and Risk Perceptions of Avian Influenza. Poultry Science 87:1526-1534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ICAP, (2007) Food industry reviews: Meat [in Greek].Google Scholar
LEPPIN, A. and ARO, A.R. (2009) Risk Perceptions Related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical Foundations of Current Empirical Research. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 16: 7-29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MCCARTHY, M., O’ REILLY, S., COTTER, L. and DE BOER, M. (2004) Factors influencing consumption of pork and poultry in the Irish market. Appetite 43: 19-28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCHMIDT, M.J. and HOLLENSEN, S. (2006) Marketing research: An international approach by Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
STRAŠEK, R. (2010) Empirical testing of correlations between the effects of country of origin and consumer perceptions. World's Poultry Science Journal 66: 39-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VOETEN, A.C.M., DE ZWART, O., VELDHUIJZEN, I.K., YUEN, C., JIANG, X., ELAM, G., ABRAHAM, T. and BRUG, J. (2009) Sources of Information and Health Beliefs Related to SARS and Avian Influenza among Chinese Communities in the United Kingdom and The Netherlands, Compared to the General Population in these Countries. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 16: 49-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VUKASOVIC, T. (2009) Consumer perception of poultry meat and the importance of country of origin in a purchase making process. World's Poultry Science Journal 65: 65-74.Google Scholar
VUKASOVIC, T. (2010) Buying decision making process for poultry meat. British Food Journal 112(2): 125-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YEUNG, R.M.W. and MORRIS, J. (2001) Consumer perception of food risk in chicken meat. Nutrition & Food science 31(6): 270-279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YEUNG, R.M.W. and YEE, W.M.S. (2002) Multi-dimensional analysis of consumer-perceived risk in chicken meat. Nutrition & Food science 32(6): 219-226.Google Scholar
YILDIRIM, I. and CEYLAN, M. (2008) Urban and rural households’ fresh chicken meat consumption behaviors in Turkey. Nutrition & Food science 38(2): 154-163.Google Scholar