Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T02:35:20.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public health implications of the infection of egg-laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

T.J. Humphrey
T.J. Humphrey
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Church Lane, Heavitree, Exeter, Devon EX2 5AD, UK
Get access

Abstract

In England and Wales in 1988, as in other European countries, eggs were identified as an important source of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 infection in humans. Unlike other non-host-adapted strains that can infect chickens, S. enteritidis PT4 is almost unique in that it can be isolated from the contents of intact, clean shell eggs. When present in the yolk of intact eggs it can survive certain forms of cooking, and analysis in England and Wales has shown that, in addition to outbreaks being associated with consumption of raw egg dishes and sauces, a number were also caused by cooked egg dishes. Although S. enteritidis PT4 is more heat-resistant than some other common poultry-associated strains, its ability to survive cooking is due more to the protective qualities of egg yolk.

In studies involving individually caged, naturally infected layers where the average prevalence was =1% of the output, the production of contaminated eggs was shown to be clustered but intermittent. This is in accord with observations made on other naturally infected flocks where the proportion of contaminated eggs has been observed to fluctuate. While salmonella-positive eggs were shown to be occurring during outbreak investigations involving human cases, some weeks later all eggs being produced by some flocks were found to be salmonella-negative even though the birds were shown to be carrying S. enteritidis PT4 at slaughter.

Although S. enteritidis PT4 has been shown to be highly virulent for young broiler chicks, it does not appear to behave in the same way in egg-laying hens. In three independent studies it was shown to be possible to infect mature hens with an inoculum as low as 100 cells. The organism was invasive and could be isolated from viscera and from egg contents. None of the birds, however, showed any signs of illness. Studies with naturally infected hens demonstrated that they have circulating antibodies against S. enteritidis PT4. There would also appear to be an association between antibody level and invasion by the organism. No such relationship exists with the production of contaminated eggs.

The ultimate control of this important human pathogen lies in the identification and eradication of infected flocks. Until that is achieved, however, significant improvements in egg quality and consumer safety can be made by storing eggs at 8°C or less. Fresh, naturally contaminated eggs contain small numbers of salmonella organisms and cool storage successfully prevents multiplication.

Keywords

Eggsinfectionpoultrypublic healthsalmonella
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 5 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ager, E.A., Kenrad, E., Nelson, M.D.Galton, M.M., Boring, J.R. and Jernigan, J.R. (1967) Two outbreaks of egg-borne salmonellosis and implications for their prevention. Journal of American Microbiology Association 199: 372–378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anon. (1988a) Poultry producers fall foul of Salmonella enteritidis. Veterinary Record 124 500Google Scholar
Anon. (1988b) Raw shell eggs, EL/88/P136, Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1989a) Salmonella in eggs. PHLS evidence to Agriculture Committee. PHLS Microbiology Digest 6: 1–9Google Scholar
Anon. (1989b) Salmonella flocks slaughtered. Veterinary Record 125: 29Google Scholar
Baker, R.C., Hogarty, S., Poon, W. and Vadehra, D.V. (1983) Survival of Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus in eggs cooked by different methods. Poultry Science 62: 1211–1216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beuchat, L.R. and Lechowich, R.V. (1968) Survival of heat by Streptococcus faecalis as affected by phase of growth and incubation temperature after thermal exposure. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 95: 414–419Google Scholar
Board, R.G. (1966) Review article: the course of microbial infection of hens' egg. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 29: 319–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, A., and Gordon, R.F. (1947) The epidemiology and control of Salmonella thompson infection of fowls. Journal of Hygiene 45: 265–281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bygrave, A.C. and Gallagher, J. (1989) Transmission of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry. Veterinary Record 125: 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chart, H., Threlfall, E.J. and Rowe, B. (1989). Virulence of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 is related to the possession of a 38 MDa plasmid. FEMS Microbiology Letters 58: 299–304Google Scholar
Chart, H., Baskerville, A., Humphrey, T.J. and Rowe, B.Serological response of chicken to Salmonella enteritidis infections. Epidemiology and Infection, in pressGoogle Scholar
Collins, M.A., (1985) Effect of pH and acidulent type on the survival of some food poisoning bacteria in mayonnaise. Microbiologie-Aliments/Nutrition 3: 215–221Google Scholar
Cowden, J.M., Lynch, D. and Joseph, C.A. et al. (1989) Report of a national case control study of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 infection. British Medical Journal 299: 771–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, E.F., Palmer, S.R., Ribeiro, C.D. et al. (1988) Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 infection: association with hens' eggs. Lancet ii: 1295–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faddoul, G.P. and Fellows, G.W. (1966) A five-year survey of the incidence of salmonellae in avian species. Avian Diseases 10: 296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, R.H., Ross, W.J. and Ayres, J.C. (1967) Salmonellae recovery following gastrointestinal and ovarian inoculation in the domestic fowl. Poultry Science 46: 849–855Google Scholar
Greenfield, J., Bigland, C.H. and McCausland, H.D. (1971) Detection of salmonella contaminated eggs. Poultry Science 50: 652–653CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodson, M. and Rowbury, R.J. (1989) Resistance of acid-habituated Escherichia coli to organic acids and its medical and applied significance. Letters in Applied Microbiology 8: 211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R.F. and Tucker, J.F. (1965) The epizootiology of Salmonella menston infection of fowls and the effect of feeding poultry food artificially infected with salmonella. British Poultry Science 6: 251–264Google Scholar
Hinton, M., Pearson, G.R., Threlfall, E.J., Rowe, B., Woodward, M. and Wray, C. (1989) Experimental Salmonella enteritidis infection in chicks. Veterinary Record 124: 223Google Scholar
Hopper, S.A. and Mawer, S.L. (1988) Salmonella enteritidis in a commercial layer flock. Veterinary Record 123: 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, T.J. (1989) The effects of high or low temperature or acid on the survival of salmonellas in eggs, egg products or poultry meat. Turkeys 37: 13–14Google Scholar
Humphrey, T.J.The growth of salmonellas in the contents of intact shell eggs: the influence of storage temperature. Veterinary Record, in pressGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, T.J., Mead, G.C. and Row, B. (1988) Poultry meat as a source of human salmonellosis in England and Wales. Epidemiology and Infection 100: 175–184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphrey, T.J., Cruickshank, J.C. and Rowe, B. (1989a) Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 and hens' eggs. Lancet i: 281Google Scholar
Humphrey, T.J., Greenwood, M., Gilbert, R.J., Rowe, B. and Chapman, P.A. (1989b) The survival of salmonellas in shell eggs cooked under simulated domestic conditions. Epidemiology and Infection 103: 35–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphrey, T.J., Baskerville, A., Chart, H. and Rowe, B. (1989c) The infection of egg-laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis PT4 by oral challenge. Veterinary Record, 125: 531–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, T.J., Baskerville, A., Mawer, S.L., Rowe, B. and Hopper, S. (1989d) Salmonella enteritidis PT4 from the contents of intact eggs: a study involving naturally infected hens. Epidemiology and Infection, 103: 415–423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Licciardello, J.L.Nickerson, J.E.R., and Goldblinth, S.A. (1965) Destruction of salmonellae in hard boiled eggs. American Journal of Public Health 55: 1622–1628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lister, S.A. (1988) Salmonella enteritidis infection in broilers and broiler breeders. Veterinary Record 123: 350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mawer, S.L., Spain, G.E. and Rowe, B. (1989) Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 and hens' eggs. Lancet i: 280–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, H.G. (1924) The examination of eggs from infected and immunised hens with germicidal tests on albumen and blood serum. Royal Institute Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin No. 197Google Scholar
Paul, J. and Batchelor, B. (1988) Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 and hens' eggs. Lancet ii: 1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampling, A., Anderson, J.R., Upson, R., Peters, E., Ward, L.R. and Rowe, B. (1989) Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 infection of broiler chickens: a hazard to public health. Lancet ii: 436–438Google Scholar
Rizk, S.S., Ayres, J.C. and Craft, A.A. (1966) Effect of holding condition on the development of salmonellae in artificially inoculated hens' eggs. Poultry Science 45: 825–829CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, W.M. (1930) Food poisoning due to eggs. British Medical Journal 11: 56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seuna, E. and Nurmi, E. (1979) Therapeutic trials with anti-microbial agents and cultured caecal microflora in Salmonella infantis infections in chicken. Poultry Science 58: 1171–1174Google Scholar
Snoeyenbos, G.H., Smyser, C.F. and Van Roekel, H. (1969) Salmonella infection of the ovary and peritoneum of chickens. Avian Diseases 13: 668–670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stafseth, H.J., Cooper, M.M and Wallbank, A.M. (1952) Survival of Salmonella pullorum on the skin of human beings and in eggs during storage and various methods of cooking. Journal of Milk and Food Technology 15: 70–73Google Scholar
Stuart, L.S. and McNally, E.H. (1943) Bacteriological studies on the shell egg. US Egg and Poultry Magazine 49: 28–47Google Scholar
Williams, J.E. (1981) Salmonellas in poultry feeds – a worldwide review. Part 1. World's Poultry Science Journal 37: 16–19Google Scholar