Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T07:47:28.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why Trade Agreements are not Setting Information Free: The Lost History and Reinvigorated Debate over Cross-Border Data Flows, Human Rights, and National Security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2015

SUSAN AARONSON*
Affiliation:
Institute for International Economic Policy, GWU
*

Abstract

Herein, we examine how the United States and the European Union use trade agreements to advance the free flow of information and to promote digital rights online. In the 1980s and 1990s, after US policymakers tried to include language governing the free flow of information in trade agreements, other nations feared a threat to their sovereignty and their ability to restrict cross-border data flows in the interest of privacy or national security.

In the twenty-first century, again many states have not responded positively to US and EU efforts to facilitate the free flow of information. They worry that the US dominates both the Internet economy and Internet governance in ways that benefit its interests. After the Snowden allegations, many states adopted strategies that restricted rather than enhanced the free flow of information. Without deliberate intent, efforts to set information free through trade liberalization may be making the Internet less free.

Finally, the two trade giants are not fully in agreement on Internet freedom, but neither has linked policies to promote the free flow of information with policies to advance digital rights. Moreover, they do not agree as to when restrictions on information are necessary and when they are protectionist.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Susan Aaronson 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, S. A. with Townes, M. (2012), ‘Can Trade Policy Set Information Free: Trade Agreements, Internet Governance and Internet Freedom (Policy Brief)’, http://www.gwu.edu/~iiep/governance/taig/CanTradePolicySetInformationFreeFINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Aaronson, S.A. and Maxim, R. (2013), ‘Data Protection and Digital Trade in the Wake of the NSA Revelations’, Intereconomics, 48, September/October, http://www.intereconomics.eu/archive/year/2013/5/871/.Google Scholar
Aaronson, S. A. and Zimmerman, J. M. (2008), Trade Imbalance: The Struggle to Weigh Human Rights Concerns in Trade Policymaking, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahearn, R. J. (2005), ‘Trade Liberalization Challenges Post-CAFTA’, CRS Report RS22339, 11/30. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P., and Staiger, R. W. (2002), ‘It's a Question of Market Access’, The American Journal of International Law, 96(1): 5676.Google Scholar
Berry, R. and Reisman, M. (2012), ‘Policy Challenges of Cross-Border Cloud Computing’, Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 4(2), http://www.usitc.gov/journals/JournalVol_IV_2.pdf (accessed 3 July 2014).Google Scholar
Bieron, B. and Ahmed, U. (2012), ‘Regulating E-Commerce through International Policy: Understanding the International Trade Law Issues of E-Commerce’, Journal of World Trade, 46(3): 545570.Google Scholar
Bildt, C. (2012), ‘Carl Bildt's Speech at Stockholm Internet Forum 2012’, 18 April, Stockholm, Sweden, http://www.government.se/sb/d/3211/a/190882 (accessed 5 August 2014).Google Scholar
Birnhack, M. D. and Elkin-Korean, N. (2003), ‘The Invisible Handshake: The Re-Emergence of the State in the Digital Environment’, Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 8(Summer).Google Scholar
Braman, S. (2012), ‘Internationalization of the Internet by Design: The First Decade’, Global Media and Communication, 8(1): 2745.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W. (1984), ‘Economic and Trade Related Aspects of Transborder Data Flow: Elements of a Code for Transnational Commerce’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 6(1): 186.Google Scholar
Burri, M. (2013), ‘Should There be New Multilateral Rules for digital Trade? Think Piece for the E15 Expert Group on Trade and Innovation’, September 2013, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344629.Google Scholar
Business Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD (1999), ‘Action Plan for Electronic Commerce’.Google Scholar
Büthe, T. and Milner, H. V. (2008), ‘The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?’, American Journal of Political Science, 52(4): 741762.Google Scholar
Chander, A. and Le, U. P. (2014), ‘Breaking the Web: Data Localization vs. the Global Internet’, Legal Studies Research Paper (2014–1), Emory Law Journal, UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 378, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2407858 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2407858.Google Scholar
Chander, A. (2009), ‘Trade 2.0’, Yale Journal of International Law, 34: 281, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1413884.Google Scholar
Checkel, J. T. (2008), ‘Process Tracing’, Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 114129.Google Scholar
Checkel, J. T. (2008), Comments of the Center for Democracy and Technology, 17, 22–23, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/comments/100921457-0457-01/attachments/CDT-ARL-ALA%20Comments%20in%20the%20Free%20Flow%20NOI.pdf (accessed 21 July 2013)Google Scholar
Checkel, J. T. (2008), Comments of the Computer and Communications Industry Association, see p. 9–10, 23, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/comments/100921457-0457-01/attachments/CCIA%20Reply%20to%20DOC-NTIA%20NOI%20on%20Global%20Free%20Flow%20of%20Information.pdf (accessed 5 August 2014).Google Scholar
‘Consultations towards a Canada–European Union Comprehensive Economic Agreement’ (2009), Canada DFAIT, http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/eu-ue/cepa-consult-apeg.aspx?lang=eng&view=d.Google Scholar
DeNardis, L. (2014), The Global War for Internet Governance, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DeNardis, L. and Raymond, R. (2013), ‘Thinking Clearly about Multistakeholder Internet Governance’, paper presented at Eighth Annual GigaNet Symposium, Bali, Indonesia, SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2354377 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2354377.Google Scholar
Denning, D. E. (2009), ‘Power over Information Flow’, in Subramanian, R. and Katz, E. (eds.), The Global Flow of Information: Legal, Social and Cultural Perspectives, New York: New York University Press, http://faculty.nps.edu/dedennin/publications/PowerOverInfoFlow-Nov2009.pdf.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., and Garrett, G. (2007), ‘The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 449472.Google Scholar
Drake, W. J. (1993), ‘Territoriality and Intangibility: Transborder Data Flows and National Sovereignty’, in Nordenstreng, Kaarle and Schiller, Herbert I. (eds.), Beyond National Sovereignty: International Communications in the 1990s. Norwood: Ablex: pp. 259313.Google Scholar
Dreyer, I. and Hindley, B. (2008), Trade in Information Technology Goods: Adapting the ITA to 21stCentury Technological Change, ECIPE Working Paper 06/2008, European Centre for International Political Economy.Google Scholar
Drezner, D. W. (2004), ‘The Global Governance of the Internet: Bringing the State back in’, Political Science Quarterly, 119(3): 477498, http://www.danieldrezner.com/research/egovernance.pdf.Google Scholar
Dutton, W. and Law, G. et al. (2011), ‘The New Internet World: A Global Perspective on Freedom of Expression, Privacy, Trust and Security Online’, The Global Information Technology Report 2010–2011, New York, World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
eBay Inc. (2014), Commerce 3.0 for Development: The Promise of the Global Empowerment Network, http://www.ebaymainstreet.com/sites/default/files/eBay_Commerce-3-for-Development.pdf.Google Scholar
Eurobarometer (2013), ‘Cyber Security Report’, Report 390, p.5, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_390_en.pdf.Google Scholar
ECIPE- European Centre for International Political Economy (2013), ‘The Economic Importance of Getting Data Protection Right: Protecting Privacy, Transmitting Data, Moving Commerce’, https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/documents/files/020508_EconomicImportance_Final_Revised_lr.pdf (accessed 8 July 2014).Google Scholar
European Commission (1979), European Society Faced with the Challenge of New Information Technologies: A Community Response, COM (79) 650 final, 26 November 1979, http://aei.pitt.edu/3806/1/3806.pdf (accessed 4 July 2014).Google Scholar
Farrell, H. (2003), ‘Constructing the International Foundations of E-Commerce – The EU–US Safe Harbor Arrangement’, International Organization, 57(2): 277306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, H. and Newman, A. L. (2010), ‘Making Global Markets: Historical Institutionalism in International Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, 17(4): 609638.Google Scholar
Fascell, D. B. and Schlundt, V. M. (1983), ‘United States International Communications and Information Policy: A Crisis in the Making’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 5: 486.Google Scholar
Gasser, U. and Palfrey, J. (2012), ‘Fostering Innovation and Trade in the Global Information Society: The Different Facets and Roles of Interoperability’, in Burri, M. and Cottier, T., Trade Governance in the Digital Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. L. and Wu, T. (2006), Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 142181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindley, B. and Makiyama, H. L. (2009), ‘Protectionism Online: Internet Censorship and International Trade Law’, ECIPE Working Paper No. 12/2009, http://www.ecipe.org/media/publication_pdfs/protectionism-online-internet-censorship-and-international-trade-law.pdf (accessed 4 July 2014).Google Scholar
Kommerskollegium, National Board of Trade (2014), ‘No Transfer, No Trade: The Importance of Cross-Border Data Transfers for Companies Based in Sweden’,http://www.kommers.se/Documents/dokumentarkiv/publikationer/2014/No_Transfer_No_Trade_webb.pdf.Google Scholar
Kommerskollegium, National Board of Trade (2012), ‘E-commerce-New Opportunities, New Barriers’, http://www.kommers.se/Documents/dokumentarkiv/publikationer/2012/skriftserien/report-e-commerce-new-opportunities-new-barriers.pdf.Google Scholar
Lee-Makiyama, H. (2011), ‘Future-Proofing World Trade in Technology: Turning the WTO IT Agreement into the International Digital Economy Agreement (IDEA)’, ECIPE Working Paper 4, European Centre for International Political Economy, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/wkshop_june13_e/future_proofing_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Lindmark, S. (2009), ‘Web 2.0: Where does Europe stand?’, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission, http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC53035.pdf.Google Scholar
Mandel, M. (2013), ‘Data, Trade and Growth’, TPRC 412, 41st Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, Progressive Policy Institute, March, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2241302 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2241302.Google Scholar
Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Lund, S., Nottebohm, O., Poulter, D., Jauch, S., and Ramaswamy, S. (2014), ‘Global Flows in a Digital Age: How Trade, Finance People, and Data Connect the World Economy’, McKinsey Global Institute, April, http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/globalization/global_flows_in_a_digital_age.Google Scholar
Marlin, B. R. (2012), “Governing the Flow: Power, Information, and Rules Online’, paper prepared for presentation at the 2012 International Studies Association Annual Meeting San Diego, California, March.Google Scholar
Maskus, K. E. and Reichman, J. H. (2004), ‘The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2): 279320.Google Scholar
Mattoo, A. and Schuknecht, L. (2000), ‘Trade Policies for Electronic Commerce’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-2380.Google Scholar
Mattoo, A. and Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2004), ‘Pre-empting Protectionism in Services: The GATS and Outsourcing’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7(4): 765800.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W. and Wolf, C. (2012), ‘A Global Reality: Government Access to Data in the Cloud –Comparative Analysis of Ten International Jurisdictions’, HoganLovells White Paper, http://www.cil.cnrs.fr/CIL/IMG/pdf/Hogan_Lovells_White_Paper_Government_Access_to_Cloud_Data_Paper_1_.pdf (accessed 23 May 2013).Google Scholar
McLoughlin, G. (2000), ‘Electronic Commerce: An Introduction’, June, US Department of State, http://fpc.state.gov/6201.htm (accessed 14 July 2014).Google Scholar
Meeker, M. (2014), ‘Internet Trends 2014, Code Conference’, 28 May 2014, http://s3.amazonaws.com/kpcbweb/files/85/Internet_Trends_2014_vFINAL_-_05_28_14-_PDF.pdf.Google Scholar
Meier, B. and Worth, R. F. (2010), ‘Emirates to Cut Data Services of Blackberry’, The New York Times’, 2 August, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/business/global/02berry.html?pagewanted=all.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. L. (2010), Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1987), Summary Report of the Workshop on The Revolution in Information and Communications Technology and the Conduct of US Foreign Affairs, Washington, DC: US National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
OECD (2013), ‘OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data’, at http://www.oecd.org/internet/ieconomy/oecdguidelinesontheprotectionofprivacyandtransborderflowsofpersonaldata.htm.Google Scholar
OECD (2007), ‘Broadband and the Economy: Ministerial Background Report’, DSTI/ICCP/IE/2007/3/Final, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, March.Google Scholar
OECD (2011a), ‘OECD Council Recommendation on Principles for Internet Policy Making’, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, December.Google Scholar
OECD (2011b), ‘The Evolving Privacy Landscape: Thirty Years after the OECD Privacy Guidelines’,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, April.Google Scholar
Open Network Initiative (2008), ‘Regional Overviews’, https://opennet.net/research/regions (accessed 21 July 2014).Google Scholar
Pearce, R. (2014), ‘Data Retention: Privacy Commissioner Issues Warning on Security’, Techworld, 9 April 2014, http://www.techworld.com.au/article/551986/data_retention_privacy_commissioner_issues_warning_security/.Google Scholar
Ryan, P., Falvey, S., and Merchant, R. (2013), ‘When the Cloud Goes Local: The Global Problem with Data Localization’, Computer, 46(12): 5459, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2370850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, M. and Goldberg, W. (2009), ‘Fair Trade Suffers when China Censors the Internet: Its not just a human Rights Issue’, Huffington Post’, 8 January, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-a-santoro-and-wendy-goldberg/chinese-internet-censorsh_b_156212.html.Google Scholar
Svantesson, D. and Jerker, B. (2007), ‘Protecting Privacy on the ‘Borderless’ Internet – Some Thoughts on Extraterritoriality and Transborder Data Flow’, Bond Law Review, 19(1), http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol19/iss1/7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietje, C. (2011), ‘Global Information Law–Some Systemic Thoughts’, Institute of Economic Law Research Center, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Beitragezum Transnational Wirtschafsrect), Heft 107, http://telc.jura.unihalle.de/sites/default/files/BeitraegeTWR/Heft%20107.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations (1982), Transnational Corporations and Transborder Data Flows, A Technical Paper.Google Scholar
United States International Trade Commission (2013), ‘Digital Trade in the US and Global Economies, Part 1′, Investigation No. 332-532, Publication 4415, July 2013.Google Scholar
United States International Trade Commission (2014), ‘Digital Trade in the US and Global Economies, Part 2′, Investigation No. 332-540, Publication 4485, August 2014.Google Scholar
Waz, J. and Weiser, P. (2012), ‘Internet Governance: The Role of Multistakeholder Organizations’, Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law. 10(2): 331, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2195167 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2195167.Google Scholar
Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2006), ‘The Internet, Cross-Border Trade in Services and the GATS: Lessons from US Gambling’, World Trade Review, 5(3): 319355.Google Scholar