Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T03:31:37.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on a Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

Get access

Extract

When the “Fort Hood Three” announced their intention to refuse to serve in Vietnam because the war, in their conscientious judgment, was immoral, illegal, and unjust, a spokesman for the Pentagon condemned them on the ground that they could have applied for conscientious objector status before induction.

But under present Selective Service law the Fort Hood Three could not have applied for conscientious objector status, because they are not pacifists. I believe that most American young men who refuse to serve in Vietnam are in the same position: they are not conscientiously opposed to all wars, but they are conscientiously opposed to this war.

Type
Selective Conscientious Objection
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)