Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:30:29.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors of the neuronal type occur in the plasma membrane of sea urchin eggs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Pedro I. Ivonnet  and
Edward L. Chambers
Pedro I. Ivonnet*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Edward L. Chambers
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
*
P.I. Ivonnet, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016430, Miami, FL 33101, USA. Telephone: +1 (305)-243-6322. Fax: +1(305)-243-5931.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The addition of acetylcholine (ACh, 100 μl of 10 μM) to the bath in the vicinity of unfertilised sea urchin eggs (Lytechinus variegatus) suspended in sea water (SW) abruptly depolarises the membrane potential (Vm) of the eggs from the resting value of approximately −70 mV. This results in the firing of the egg's action potential, followed by partial repolarisation. Similar addition of ACh to eggs voltage clamped at −70 mV induces an inward current of abrupt onset with peak amplitude of −1.26 ± 0.20 nA (SE, n = 81). When the eggs are clamped at a Vm more positive than −70 mV, the peak amplitude of the ACh-induced inward current decreases, becoming 0 at a clamped Vm of approximately −20 mV. Further positive shift of the Vm fails to cause reversal of the current. Oocytes clamped at −70 mV exhibit similar inward current responses following application of ACh. Since ACh stimulates both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors (nACh-R and mACh-R, respectively), the effects of exposing eggs to the agonists and antagonists for each type of receptor were examined. For unfertilised eggs clamped at −70 mV the application of 100 μM (−)-nicotine hydrogen tartrate, an agonist of the nACh-R, induces an inward current response similar to that elicited by 10 μM ACh, but of smaller peak amplitude. In contrast, the application of (+)-muscarine chloride, an agonist of the mACh-R, fails to induce any response. Antagonists of the nACh-R inhibit either the neuronal type of nACh-R or the skeletal muscle type of nACh-R. The effect of the antagonists on the amplitudes of the ACh-induced inward current response was determined by supervising individual eggs clamped at −70 mV with the desired antagonist dissolved in SW, followed by the addition of 100 μl of 10 μM ACh in the vicinity of the egg. Mecamylamine chloride, an antagonist of the neuronal nACh-R at a concentration of 1 μM, markedly decreases the response to ACh, while at a concentration of 10 μM the response to ACh is abolished. Hexamethonium chloride, another inhibitor of the nACh-R of the neuronal type, also diminishes the ACh-induced response, but at a concentration of 10 μM the response is not completely abolished. Exposure of eggs to α-bungarotoxin, an antagonist of the skeletal muscle nACh-R at concentrations up to 250 nM for periods of 30 min, has no effect on the ACh-induced response. The effects of two antagonists of the mACh-R, atropine sulphate and QNB (R-(−)-3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) were also examined. Exposure of eggs to 1 μM atropine does not affect the ACh-induced response, but at concentrations of 10 μM atropine the amplitude of the ACh-induced inward current is significantly reduced. The exposure of eggs to QNB, a highly specific antagonist of the mACh-R, at concentrations up to 50 nM, has no effect on the ACh-induced response. Consequently, the likely explanation for the inhibitory effect of atropine is that at high concentrations atropine cross-reacts with the nACh-R. These findings reveal the presence in unfertilised sea urchin eggs of an ACh-R resembling the neuronal nACh-R. No evidence could be obtained that these receptors have a role in sperm entry, activation of the egg, or early development.

Keywords

Sea urchinEggUnfertilisedNicotinic receptorAcetylcholineFertilisation
Type
Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , August 1997 , pp. 277 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, D.J. & Nutter, T.J. (1992). Calcium permeability and modulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-channels in rat parasympathetic neurons. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 86, 67–76.Google ScholarPubMed
Buznikov, G.A. (1984). The activation of neurotransmitters and related substances on early embryogenesis. Pharmac. Ther.. 25, 23–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buznikov, G.A. (1987). Acetylcholine and biogenic monoamines as intracellular regulators of early embryogenesis. Sov. Sci. Rev. F. Physiol. Gen. Biol. 1, 137–96.Google Scholar
Chambers, E.L. & de Armendi, J. (1979). Membrane potential, action potential and activation potential of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. Exp. Cell Res. 122, 203–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dascal, N. & Landau, E.M. (1980). Types of muscarinic response in Xenopus oocytes. Life Sci.. 27, 1423–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eusebi, F., Pasetto, N. & Siracusa, G. (1984). Acetylcholine receptors in human oocytes. Physiol. (Lond.). 346, 321–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falugi, C. (1993). Localization and possible role of molecules associated with the cholinergic system during ‘nonnervous’ developmental events. Eur. J. Histochem. 37, 287–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Falugi, C., Pera, C. & Prestipino, G. (1989). Localization of alpha-bungarotoxin receptors and AChE activity in eggs and embryos of Paracentrotus lividus LMK. Acta Embryol. Morphol. Exp. NS 10, 113–19.Google Scholar
Feltz, A., Large, W.A. & Trautmann, A. (1977). Analysis of atropine action at the frog neuromuscular junction. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 269, 109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieber, L. & Adams, D.J. (1991). Acetylcholine-evoked currents in cultured neurones dissociated from rat parasympathetic cardiac ganglia. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 434, 215–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fluck, R.A., (1982). Localization of acetylcholinesterase activity in young embryos of the medaka Oryzias latipes, a teleost. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.. 72C, 59–64.Google Scholar
Fluck, R.A. & Shih, T.M. (1981). Acetylcholine in embryos of Oryzias latipes, a teleost: gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 70C, 129–30.Google Scholar
Hertwig, O. & Hertwig, R. (1987). Über den Befruchtungs und Teilungsvargang des tierischen Eies unter dem Einfluss ausserer Agentien. Jena. Zschr. Naturwiss. 20, 120.Google Scholar
Hille, B. (1992). Ligand-gated channels of fast chemical synapses. In Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, p. 159. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Jaffe, L.A. (1976). Fast block to polyspermy in sea urchin is electrically mediated. Nature 261, 68–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffe, L.A. (1980). Electrical polyspermy block in sea urchins: nicotine and low sodium experiments. Dev. Growth Differ. 22, 503–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusano, K., Miledi, R. & Stinnakre, J. (1982). Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 328, 143–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laasberg, T., Pedak, A. & Neuman, T. (1987). The muscarinic receptor-mediated action of acetylcholine in the gastrulating chick embryo. Comp Biochem Physiol. 86C, 313–16.Google Scholar
Longo, F.J. & Anderson, E. (1970). The effect of nicotine on fertilization in the sea urchins Arbacia punctulata. J. Cell Eiol.. 46, 308–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, J.W. & Chambers, E.L. (1984). Voltage-clamp studies of fertilization in sea urchin eggs. I. Effect of clamped membrane potential on sperm entry and development. Deo. Eiol. 128, 98–109.Google Scholar
Lynn, J.W., McCulloh, D.H. & Chambers, E.L. (1988). Voltage-clamp studies in sea urchin eggs. II. Current patterns in relation to sperm entry, nonentry, and activation. Dev. Eiol.. 128, 305–23.Google ScholarPubMed
McCulloh, D.H. (1989). Sperm entry in sea urchin eggs: recent inferences concerning its mechanism. In Mechanisms of Egg Activation, ed. Nuccitelli, R., Cherr, G.N. & Clark, W.H., pp. 19–42. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloh, D.H. & Chambers, E.L. (1992). Fusion of membranes during fertilization: increaes of sea urchin egg's membrane capacitance and membrane conductance at the site of contact with the sperm. J. Gen. Physiol. 99, 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W.A. & Goldner, M.M. (1975). Voltage clamping with a single microelectrode. J. Neurobiol. 6, 411–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed