Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T03:40:32.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultrastructural study of endogenous energy substrates in spermatozoa of the four species of the sea urchin, Echinometra mataei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

Masaru Nakamura
Affiliation:
Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of The Ryukyus, 3422 Sesoko, Motobu, Okinawa 905-0227, Japan
Tsuyoshi Uehara
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan
Masatoshi Mita
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, School of Education, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8050, Japan Teikyo Junior College, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 151-0071, Japan

Extract

The sea urchin Echinometra mathaei (Blainville) which belongs to the order Echinoida, occurs in abundance on shallow reefs throughout the tropical to warm Indo-Pacific region. Though Okinawan E. mathaei had been considered as a single species showing extensive morphological variation in test shape and spine colour, it was recently shown that the genus Echinomtra consists of four independent species (Uehara & Shingaki, 1984, 1985; Arakaki et al., 1998). However, the scientific names of these four complex species found in Okinawa are still unclear. These Echinometra are tentatively described here as Echinometra sp. A, B, C and D. Echinometra sp. A is characterised by white-tipped spines, a definite bright milled ring and dark skin on the peristome. Echinometra sp. B is characterised by spines with no white tip, with very faded milled rings and dark skin on the peristome. Echinometra sp. D is characterised by spines without a white tip but with a definite bright milled ring and bright skin on the peristome. In the field, these two Echinometra sp. exhibit a richly coloured variation in spines. Echinometra sp. D is characterised by deep black spines with well-defined milled rings and dark skin around the peristome. Only black-spined individuals have been found so far. In addition, these species show different distribution patterns, habitat preference and agonistic behaviour. It has also been shown that these two species are not possible to cross-fertilise under sperm at limiting concentration.

Type
Special Lecture for Citizens
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arakaki, Y., Uehara, T. & Fagoonee, I. (1998). Zool. Sci. 15, 159–68.Google Scholar
Mita, M. & Nakamura, M. (1993). Zool Sci. 10, 7383.Google Scholar
Mita, M. & Nakamura, M. (1998). Zool. Sci. 15, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mita, M., Oguchi, A., Kikuyama, S., De Santis, R. & Nakamura, M. (1994 a) Zool. Sci. 11, 701–5.Google Scholar
Mita, M., Yasumasu, I. & Nakamura, M. (1994 b). J. Biochem. 116, 108–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mita, M., Yasumasu, I. & Nakamura, M. (1995). Mol. Reprod. Dev. 40, 103–9.Google Scholar
Uehara, T. & Shingaki, M. (1984). Zool. Sci. 1, 1008.Google Scholar
Uehara, T. & Shingaki, M. (1985). Zool. Sci. 2, 1009.Google Scholar