Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:38:53.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The fragility of community security in Damascus and its environs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Yassar Abdin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The organizational errors of Syrian urban planning have been a major cause of the escalation of the Syrian crisis and its continuation. Syrian cities, including Damascus and its environs, have suffered from the fragility of social security, which is manifested in the form of cohesive human groups in closed communities, influenced by religion, culture, family, class, place of origin of the population, occupation, etc. This article examines the fragility of security during the crisis of 2011–18, with the aim of clarifying the impact of the organizational problems and the processing delay that has generated social security fragility because these closed communities are looking for their own security and safety outside the control of local administrations. The article proposes that the inherent fragility of security in Damascus and its environs should be associated with poverty, organizational errors and slums as a model for the fragility of all Syrian cities.

Keywords

social cohesionDamascusDamascus environsSyrian crisissocial housing/informal settlements
Type
Syria: The human cost of war
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 99 , Issue 906: Conflict in Syria , December 2017 , pp. 897 - 925
Copyright
Copyright © icrc 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bakr, Abu, Biaqadir, Rashiq and Warashiquin, Hassan, Anthropology in the Arab World [ا لأنثربولوجيا في الوطن العربي ], Dar Al-Fikr, Damascus, 2012, p. 208Google Scholar.

2 Hamad, Faisal, “Social Love” [المخاطر الاجتماعية], Bridge Development Journal, No. 124, 2015, pp. 2–4Google Scholar.

3 Information on the 2010 Damascus census available at: https://tinyurl.com/yy8vnm2a (in Arabic). There are no accurate statistics after 2010, the main indicator of any comparison during and after the war.

4 Governorate of Rural Damascus, Diagnostic and Prospects Report, Regional Planning of Damascus: General Technical Studies and Consultations, unpublished report, 2011, p. 42.

5 Governorate of Rural Damascus, Report on the Protection of Agricultural Resources in Rural Damascus for the Regional Planning Project of the Damascus Countryside: General Studies and Technical Consultations, unpublished report, 2012, p. 54.

6 Governorate of Rural Damascus, Summary of the Tourism Study for the Rural Damascus Building Planning Project, 2012, p. 34.

7 Governorate of Rural Damascus, Report of Specialized Works for the Rural Damascus Planning Project: General Technical Studies and Consultations, unpublished report, 2011.

8 Ibid., p. 61.

9 Ibid., p. 64.

10 Ibid., p. 64.

11 Ibid., p. 66.

12 Ibid., p. 66.

13 Central Bureau of Statistics, Statistical Data of the City of Damascus: Annual Statistics, 2002–2010, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Syria, 2010Google Scholar.

14 Governorate of Damascus, Damascus City Building Plan for 1968, Decision No. 10/7, Municipal Ministry, 1970.

15 Union of Syrian Engineers, Damascus Building Plan and its Annexes until December 1971, Damascus, 1980Google Scholar.

16 Governorate of Damascus, Law Enforcement Procedure No. 26 (Amending Law No. 60 of 1979), Urban Organization Directorate, 2000.

17 Regional Centre for Strategic Studies, “Threats of a Rift: The Internal Situation in Fragile Middle Eastern States” [تهديدات التصدع : الأوضاع الداخلية للشرق الأوسط في مؤشر الدول الهشة،], Regional Studies, Vol. 3, No. 107, 2014.

18 Natalya Atafat, Spatial Reading of the Regional Planning Experiment of Rural Damascus [ القراءة المكانية للأراضي في تجربة التخطيط الإقليمي لريف دمشق ], Damascus University, 2015.

19 Syrian Centre for Research Studies and Institute of Social Justice and Conflict Resolution, Forced Migration (Dispersion), The Human Condition in Syria: Demographic Report [ الديمغرافي التقرير ,سورية في الإنسان حالة القسري، لتشتت ], Lebanese American University, Beirut, 8 December 2016.

20 Syrian Centre for Research Studies, Social Rift in Syria: Impact of the Conflict on Social Capital [الاجتماعي المال رأس في النزاع أثر – سورية في الاجتماعي ], Damascus, 1 June 2017.

21 Regional Planning Commission, Report of the Informal Settlements of Damascus Rural Governorate, Municipal Ministry, unpublished report, Damascus, April 2013, p. 31.

22 Ibid., p. 43.

23 Navar Abd-el Hamid, A Guide to Multidimensional Poverty: Policies to Address the Problems of Disconnected Disabilities in the Arab States, Arab Human Development Report, Research Paper Series, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Regional Office for Arab States, 2014; Heba, Alithi and Khalid, Abu Ismail, Poverty in Syria: 1996–2004, Development Policy Office, UNDP, Beirut, 2005Google Scholar.

24 A. Heba and A. I. Khalid, above note 23. See also Central Bureau of Statistics, Household Income and Expenditure Survey: Annual Statistical Collections from 2004 to 2010, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Damascus, 2010Google Scholar; Governorate of Damascus, Report of Detailed Planning and Organizational Studies for the Approved Urban Development areas in Damascus: Action Plan 2010–2025, Municipal Ministry, 2010Google Scholar.

25 Central Bureau of Statistics, above note 24.

26 Governorate of Damascus, above note 24.

27 Rif Dimashq Governorate campaign, “Maps 2012–2018”, available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rif_Dimashq_Governorate_campaign.