Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:11:12.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electron Traps in Rutile TiO2 Crystals: Intrinsic Small Polarons, Impurities, and Oxygen Vacancies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2015

Larry E. Halliburton
Larry E. Halliburton*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Rutile TiO2 is well known for its ability to “trap” photoinduced electrons at Ti4+ ions and form Ti3+ ions with an unpaired d1 electron. This has been shown experimentally to result in a large family of similar, yet slightly different, Ti3+-related centers that include both intrinsic small polarons and donor-bound small polarons. In these latter centers, the Ti3+ ion is located next to an oxygen vacancy or an impurity such as fluorine, lithium, or hydrogen. These small polarons are easily formed in commercially available bulk single crystals of rutile TiO2 by illuminating oxidized (and nominally undoped) samples at temperatures between 5 and 30 K with sub-band-gap laser light (e.g., 442 nm) or by slight reducing treatments (in the case of hydrogen). Once formed, the ground states of the defects are readily studied at low temperature with magnetic resonance (EPR and ENDOR). Single crystals of rutile TiO2 provide complete sets of angular dependence data, and thus allow detailed information about the ground-state models of the electron traps to be extracted in the form of g matrices and hyperfine matrices. In this review, the differences and similarities of the various Ti3+-related trapped electron centers are described.

Keywords

electron spin resonancetransparent conductorsemiconducting
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1731: Symposium O – Oxide Semiconductors , 2015 , mrsf14-1731-o06-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fujishima, A., Zhang, X., and Tryk, D. A., Surf. Sci. Rep. 63, 515 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Halliburton, L. E., Manivannan, A., Bunton, P. H., Baker, D. B., Klemm, M., Horn, S., and Fujishima, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 162114 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S. and Halliburton, L. E., Phys. Rev. B 81, 035204 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brant, A. T., Yang, S., Giles, N. C., and Halliburton, L. E., J. Appl. Phys. 110, 053714 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brant, A. T., Giles, N. C., and Halliburton, L. E., J. Appl. Phys. 113, 053712 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Brant, A. T., Giles, N. C., and Halliburton, L. E., Phys. Rev. B 87, 125201 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brant, A. T., Giles, N. C., Yang, S., Sarker, M. A. R., Watauchi, S., Nagao, M., Tanaka, I., Tryk, D. A., Manivannan, A., and Halliburton, L. E., J. Appl. Phys. 114, 113702 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brant, A. T., Golden, E. M., Giles, N. C., Yang, S., Sarker, M. A. R., Watauchi, S., Nagao, M., Tanaka, I., Tryk, D. A., Manivannan, A., and Halliburton, L. E., Phys. Rev. B 89, 115206 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahams, S. C. and Bernstein, J. L., J. Chem. Phys. 55, 3206 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S., Brant, A. T., and Halliburton, L. E., Phys. Rev. B 82, 035209 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chester, P. F., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 2233 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar