Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:55:33.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GENDER GAP IN ACQUISITION AND PRACTICE OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE: CASE STUDY OF RICE FARMING IN WEST AFRICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2016

ESPÉRANCE ZOSSOU ,
AMINOU AROUNA ,
ALIOU DIAGNE  and
RITA AFIAVI AGBOH-NOAMESHIE
ESPÉRANCE ZOSSOU*
Affiliation:
Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 BP 2031 Cotonou, Benin Polytechnic University of Abomey, BP 2282 Abomey, Zou, Benin
AMINOU AROUNA
Affiliation:
Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 BP 2031 Cotonou, Benin
ALIOU DIAGNE
Affiliation:
University of Gaston Berger, BP 234 Saint-Louis, Senegal
RITA AFIAVI AGBOH-NOAMESHIE
Affiliation:
Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 BP 2031 Cotonou, Benin
*
§Corresponding author. Email: benezos@yahoo.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Improving farmers’ knowledge of new technologies and creating conducive learning opportunities, with particular attention to the marginalized poor (women and youth), are major factors in the move towards sustainable agriculture. To explore the gender gap in agricultural knowledge acquisition and adoption in West Africa, we used baseline data collected in 2013 and 2014 in five countries (Benin, Côte d'Ivoire, Niger, Nigeria and Togo) with 499 surveyed households. The t-test and Kruskal–Wallis test were used for analysis. The most quoted source for acquiring knowledge on rice farming methods was ‘other farmers’, showing the importance of social capital for rural African farmers. In Benin, a gender gap was noted in rice farmers’ access to agricultural knowledge sources, with women being more advantaged. In Côte d'Ivoire, Niger, Nigeria and Togo, no significant gender gap was observed in rice farmers’ access to agricultural knowledge sources. Regarding the level of knowledge and use of rice farming methods in Côte d'Ivoire and Niger, significant gender gaps were observed. The gender approach to rural development is having impact in West Africa with regard to farmers’ access to agricultural information. However, interactive rural learning approaches (such as farmer-to-farmer video) need to be resorted to make the technologies’ principles well known and improve the ability of marginalized poor to adopt and or innovate with local or limited resources. This study leads to a better understanding of the relationship between gender, knowledge and use of agricultural technologies in order to enhance marginalized farmers’ adoption of improved innovations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 566 - 577
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research was conducted at Africa Rice Center.

References

REFERENCES

Atchoarena, D. and Gasperini, L. (2003). Education for Rural Development: Towards New Policy Responses. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
Axinn, H. G. (1997). Challenges to agricultural extension in the twenty first century. In Farmer-led Extension: Concepts and Practices, 13–21 (Eds Scarborough, V., Killough, S., Johnson, D. A. and Farrington, J.). London: Intermediate Technology Publications, Ltd. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baden, S. and Milward, K. (1997). Gender Inequality and Poverty: Trends, Linkages, Analysis and Policy Implications. BRIDGE Report No. 30. Prepared for the Gender Equality Unit, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Bosc, P. M., Eychenne, D., Hussein, K., Losch, B., Mercoiret, M. R., Rondot, P. and Mackintosh-Walker, S. (2003). The Role of Rural Producers Organizations in the World Bank Rural Development Strategy. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Buttle, F. A. (1998). Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing. Journalof Strategic Marketing 6:241–254. doi:10.1080/096525498346658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, A. H., Van Mele, P. and Hauser, M. (2011). Contribution of farmer-to-farmer video to capital assets building: evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35:408–435. doi:10.1080/10440046.2011.562059.Google Scholar
Czapiewski, K. L., Florianczyk, Z. and Janc, K. (2010). Agricultural knowledge and rural economy analysis on micro and macro scales. In Rural Areas and Development vol. 7 Linking Competitiveness with Equity and Sustainability: New Ideas for the Socio-Economic Development of Rural Areas, 25–36 (Ed Fieldsend, A.). Debrecan, Hungary: University of Debrecen Centre of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering and Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics—National Research Institute.Google Scholar
Fafchamps, M., Gabre-Madhin, E. and Minten, B. (2005). Increasing returns and market efficiency in agricultural trade. Journalof Development Economics 78:406–442. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, C. (2011). L’éducation des femmes et le développement en Afrique subsaharienne. Economies and finances. HAL. http://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/file/index/docid/653382/filename/Fink-education_femmes_Afrique_subsaharienne-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Katungi, E., Edmeades, S. and Smale, M. (2008). Gender, social capital and information exchange in rural Uganda. Journal of International Development 20 (1):35–52. doi:10.1002/jid.1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., Andersen, C., White, S. H., Klahr, D. and Carver, S. M. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 60 (4):1–157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1166059.Google Scholar
Livingston, G., Schonberger, S. and Delaney, S. (2011). Sub-saharan Africa: The state of smallholders in agriculture. Paper presented at the Conference on New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture, Rome, January 24–25.Google Scholar
Manfre, C., Rubin, D., Allen, A., Summerfield, G., Colverson, K. and Akeredolu, M. (2013). Reducing the Gender Gap in Agricultural Extension and Advisory Services: How to Find the Best Fit for Men and Women Farmers. MEAS Discussion Paper 2. East Lansing, MI: Modernizing Extension and Advisory Services. http://agrilinks.org/sites/default/files/resource/files/MEAS%20Discussion%20Paper%202%20-%20Gender%20and%20Extension%20-%202013_04_01_0_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Obidike, N. A. (2011). Rural farmers’ problems accessing agricultural information: A case study of Nsukka local government area of Enugu State, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), Paper 660. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/660.Google Scholar
Oxfam. (2008). Double-Edged Prices. Oxfam Briefing Paper 121. Oxford: Oxfam International.Google Scholar
Renay, E. (2010). La place des organisations paysannes africaines au sein de la démarche participative. Enjeux et perspectives. Mémoire bibliographique de spécialisation professionnelle ETH.R17. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence Aix-Marseille 1, Département d'Anthropologie.Google Scholar
Rosegrant, M. and Cline, S. (2003). Global food security: Challenges and policies. Science 302:1917–1919. doi:10.1126/science.1092958.Google Scholar
Staatz, J., Dembélé, N. and Mabiso, A. (2007). Agriculture for Development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Background paper for the World Development Report 2008. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2008/Resources/2795087-1191427986785/StaatzJ&DembeleN_AgriForDevtInSSA_ve19.pdf.Google Scholar
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2010). Adult and youth literacy: Global trends in gender parity. UIS Fact Sheet No. 3. http://www.unesco.org/education/ild2010/FactSheet2010_Lit_EN.pdf (Accessed 27 March 2015).Google Scholar
Van Crowder, L. and Fortier, F. (2000). National Agricultural and Rural Knowledge and Information System (NARKIS): A Proposed Component of the Uganda National Agricultural Advisory Service. (NAADS). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Westermann, O., Ashby, J. and Pretty, J. (2005). Gender and social capital: The importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development 33 (11):1783–1799. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.018.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, B. (2011). Enterprising strangers: social capital and social liability among African migrant traders. International Journal of Social Inquiry 4 (1):93–111.Google Scholar
Wiesen, G. (2014). What is knowledge acquisition?. wiseGEEK. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-knowledge-acquisition.htm (Accessed 30 December).Google Scholar
World Bank. (2008). Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. Washington, DC: The World Bank; Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Fund for Agricultural Development. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6603 Google Scholar
Zossou, E., Van Mele, P., Vodouhe, S. D. and Wanvoeke, J. (2009). The power of video to trigger innovation: Rice processing in central Benin. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7:119–129. doi:10.3763/ijas.2009.0438.Google Scholar
Zossou, E., Van Mele, P., Vodouhe, S. D. and Wanvoeke, J. (2010). Women groups formed in response to public screenings of rice video in Benin. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8:270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zossou, E., Van Mele, P., Wanvoeke, J. and Lebailly, P. (2012). Participatory impact assessment of rice parboiling videos with women in Benin. Experimental Agriculture 48 (3):438–447. doi:10.1017/S0014479712000117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar