Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:05:07.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing supervisory competence: preliminary data on the impact of CBT supervision training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2013

Katherine Newman Taylor*
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Kenneth Gordon
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, and Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
Simon Grist
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, and Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
Charlotte Olding
Affiliation:
University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr K. Newman Taylor, Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. (email: knt@soton.ac.uk).

Abstract

Clinical supervision is key to the delivery and governance of effective psychological work. We place increasing emphasis on the evidence base in our clinical decision making, and yet there is no comparable body of information to inform our supervisory practice. This is a serious problem for psychological therapists; there is an urgent need for theoretically driven and empirically evaluated approaches to supervision, and the training of such skills. This preliminary evaluation examined the impact of a 5-day training designed for Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) supervisors new to the role. A within-subject, repeated-measures design was used to compare self-assessed supervision competencies over the course of training. Twenty-eight IAPT supervisors completed 5 days’ training based on the Supervision Competencies Framework and IAPT Supervision Guidance. Significant improvements were found in ratings of generic, specific, applied and meta-supervision competencies, as well as overall competency. This evaluation gives preliminary support for the impact of training on supervisory competencies. There are clear limitations, particularly the lack of objective measures and comparison training. Nevertheless, in the context of a very limited evidence base to date, the study contributes to a more robust approach to developing supervisory competence in clinical practice.

Type
Education and supervision
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended follow-up reading

Gordon, PK (2012). Ten steps to clinical supervision. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Published online 19 October 2012. doi:10.1017/S1754470X12000050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, DL, Dunkerley, C (2010). Towards evidence-based clinical supervision: the development and evaluation of four CBT guidelines. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist 3, 4357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, AD, Pilling, S (2007). A competence framework for the supervision of psychological therapies (http://www.ucl.ac.uk/CORE/).Google Scholar

References

BABCP (2010). Standards of conduct, performance and ethics. Bury.Google Scholar
Blackburn, IM, James, IA, Milne, DL, Reichelt, FK (2001). The revised cognitive therapy scale (CTSR): psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 29, 431446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, G (2001). Improving supervision skills: a cognitive behavioural perspective. Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre Workshop, 10.03.2005.Google Scholar
DCP (2005). Continued supervision policy document. Leicester: Division of Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
DoH (2008). Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT): commissioning toolkit. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Gordon, PK (2012). Ten steps to clinical supervision. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Published online 19 October 2012. doi:10.1017/S1754470X12000050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennerley H (2006). Improving supervision skills: problems and complexities in practice. Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre Workshop, 03.11.2009.Google Scholar
Lewis, K (2012). Update on supervision developments in behavioural and cognitive psychotherapies. CBT Today 40 (1), pamphlet.Google Scholar
Milne, DL, Dunkerley, C (2010). Towards evidence-based clinical supervision: the development and evaluation of four CBT guidelines. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist 3, 4357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, DL, James, IA (2000). A systematic review of effective cognitive-behavioural supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 39, 111127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milne, DL, Sheikh, AL, Pattison, S, Wilkinson, A (2011). Evidence based training for clinical supervisors: a systematic review. The Clinical Supervisor 30, 5371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padesky, CA (2006). The next phase: building positive qualities with cognitive therapy. Invited address presented at the International Congress of Cognitive Psychotherapy. Göteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Parry, G (2000). Improving psychotherapy services: applications of research, audit and evaluation. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 31, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, AD, Pilling, S (2007). A competence framework for the supervision of psychological therapies (http://www.ucl.ac.uk/CORE/).Google Scholar
Safran, JD, Segal, ZV (1990). Cognitive Therapy: An Interpersonal Process Perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Scaife, J (2008). Supervision in Clinical Practice: A Practitioner's Guide, 2nd edn. Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.