Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T21:20:26.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fighting Fire with Fire and Getting Burnt: a review of Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin American Trade Liberalization Edited by J. Michael Finger and Julio J. Nogues Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2006

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2007

Jorge Miranda
Jorge Miranda*
Affiliation:
Principal International Trade Advisor, International Trade Group, King & Spalding LLP
*
Email: gmiranda@kslaw.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review essay
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , July 2007 , pp. 311 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Jorge Miranda 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argentina – Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports of Ceramic Floor Tiles from Italy (Ceramic Tiles Panel Report), adopted 5 November 2001.Google Scholar
Argentina – Definitive Anti-Dumping Duties on Poultry from Brazil, Panel Report (Poultry Panel Report), WT/DS241/R, adopted 19 May 2003.Google Scholar
Argentina – Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Preserved Peaches, Panel Report (Peaches Panel Report), WT/DS238/R, adopted 15 April 2003.Google Scholar
Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear, Panel Report (Footwear Panel Report), WT/DS121/R, adopted 12 January 2000, as modified by the Appellate Body Report.Google Scholar
Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear, Appellate Body Report (Footwear AB Report), WT/DS121/AB/R, adopted 12 January 2000.Google Scholar
Argentina – Transitional Safeguard Measures on Certain Imports of Woven Fabrics of Cotton and Cotton Mixtures Originating from Brazil, Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Brazil (Cotton Panel Request), WT/DS190/1.Google Scholar
Argentina – Transitional Safeguard Measures on Certain Imports of Woven Fabrics of Cotton and Cotton Mixtures Originating from Brazil, Notification of a Mutually Agreed Solution (Cotton Settlement), WT/DS190/2.Google Scholar
Beef and Offal from the United States, Re-Determination Pursuant to the Panel Decision of March 15, 2004 (Beef Re-Determination), Diario Oficial, 20 October 2004.Google Scholar
Carbon Steel Line Pipe from the United States, Notice of Initiation (Line Pipe Notice of Initiation), Diario Oficial, 29 August 2003.Google Scholar
Cattle, Beef, and Offal from the United States, Notice of Initiation (Beef Notice of Initiation), Diario Oficial, 21 October 1998.Google Scholar
Cattle, Beef and Offal from the United States, Final Determination (Beef Final Determination), Diario Oficial, 28 April 2000.Google Scholar
Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether from the United States, Notice of Initiation (EGME Notice of Initiation), Diario Oficial, 14 December 2001.Google Scholar
Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether from the United States, Final Determination (EGME Final Determination), Diario Oficial, 10 June 2003.Google Scholar
Finger, J. Michael (1993), Antidumping: How it Works and Who Gets Hurt, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. and Osorio, M. (2005), ‘Do We Need Antidumping Rules?’, Working Paper, Department of Applied Economics, University of Chile.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishmeal from Chile, Final Determination (Fishmeal Final Determination), Diario Oficial, 20 October 1994.Google Scholar
High Fructose Corn Syrup from the United States, Notice of Revocation (HFCS Notice of Revocation), Diario Oficial, 20 May 2002.Google Scholar
Long-Grain Milled Rice from the United States, Notice of Initiation (Rice Notice of Initiation), Diario Oficial, 11 December 2000.Google Scholar
Long-Grain Milled Rice from the United States, Final Determination (Rice Final Determination), Diario Oficial, 5 June 2002.Google Scholar
Long-Grain Milled Rice from the United States, Re-Determination (Rice Re-Determination), Diario Oficial, 11 September 2006.Google Scholar
Mexico – Anti-Dumping Investigation of High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) from the United States, Panel Report (HFCS Panel Report), WT/DS132/R, adopted 24 February 2000.Google Scholar
Mexico – Anti-Dumping Investigation of High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) from the United States, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by the United States, Panel Report (HFCS 21.5 Panel Report), WT/DS132/RW, adopted 21 November 2001, as upheld by the Appellate Body Report.Google Scholar
Mexico – Anti-Dumping Investigation of High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) from the United States, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by the United States, Appellate Body Report (HFCS 21.5 AB Report), WT/DS132/AB/RW, adopted 21 November 2001.Google Scholar
Mexico – Anti-Dumping Duties on Steel Pipes and Tubes from Guatemala, Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Guatemala (Steel Pipes Panel Request), WT/DS331/2.Google Scholar
Mexico – Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Beef and Rice, Complaint with Respect to Rice, Panel Report (Rice Panel Report), WT/DS295/R, adopted 20 December 2005, as modified by the Appellate Body Report (on other grounds).Google Scholar
Mexico – Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Beef and Rice, Complaint with Respect to Rice, Appellate Body Report (Rice AB Report), WT/DS295/AB/R, adopted 20 December 2005.Google Scholar
Mexico – Provisional Anti-Dumping Measure on Electric Transformers, Request for Consultations by Brazil (Electric Power Transformers Request for Consultations), WT/DS216/1.Google Scholar
Mexico – Semi-Annual Report under Article 16.4 of the Agreement (Mexico Semi-Annual Report Jan–Jun 2001), G/ADP/N/78/MEX.Google Scholar
Mexico – Tax Measures on Soft Drinks and Other Beverages, Panel Report (HFCS Tax Panel Report), WT/DS308/R, adopted 24 March 2006, as modified by the Appellate Body Report.Google Scholar
Mexico – Tax Measures on Soft Drinks and Other Beverages, Appellate Body Report (HFCS Tax AB Report), WT/DS308/AB/R, adopted 24 March 2006.Google Scholar
MEX–USA-98-1904-01, Decision of August 3, 2001 (NAFTA Panel Decision of August 3, 2001).Google Scholar
MEX–USA-98-1904-01, Decision of April 15, 2002 (NAFTA Panel Decision of April 15, 2002).Google Scholar
MEX–USA 00-1904-02, Decision of March 15, 2004 (NAFTA Panel Decision of March 15, 2004).Google Scholar
Miranda, J., Torres, R. and Ruiz, M. (1998), ‘The International Use of Antidumping: 1987–1997’, Journal of World Trade, 32(5): 5–71.Google Scholar
Minutes of the Fifty-Ninth Meeting of the TMB (Minutes TMB), G/TMB/20.Google Scholar
Partially Hydrogenated Fatty Acid from the United States, Notice of Initiation (Fatty Acid Notice of Initiation), Diario Oficial, 6 June 2003.Google Scholar
Partially Hydrogenated Fatty Acid from the United States, Final Determination (Fatty Acid Final Determination), Diario Oficial, 5 April 2005.Google Scholar
Red Delicious and Golden Delicious Apples from the United States, Preliminary Determination (Apples Preliminary Determination), Diario Oficial, 1 September 1997.Google Scholar
Tripled Press Stearic Acid from the United States, Notice of Initiation (TPSA Notice of Initiation), Diario Oficial, 11 June 2003.Google Scholar
Vegetable Oils from Argentina, Resolucion No. 0296-2006/TDC-INDECOPI (Vegetable Oils Tribunal Decision), Tribunal de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Propiedad Intelectual, Sala de Defensa de la Competencia.Google Scholar