Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T18:29:52.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon and Archaeology – Long-Term Alliance: Review of R E Taylor, O Bar-Yosef. Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. 2nd edition. Foreword by C Renfrew. 2014. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978–1–59874–590–0; 403 pages, with 78 illustrations and 38 tables. List price $129 US (hardback).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. iii - vii
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, JR, Libby, WF. 1949. Age determinations by radiocarbon content: checks with samples of known age. Science 110(2869):678–680.Google Scholar
Beck, W, Donahue, DJ, Jull, AJT, Burr, G, Broecker, WS, Bonani, G, Hajdas, I, Malotki, E. 1998. Ambiguities in direct dating of rock surfaces using radiocarbon measurements. Science 280(5372):2132–2135.Google Scholar
Berstan, R, Stott, AW, Minnitt, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Hedges, REM, Evershed, RP. 2008. Direct dating of pottery from its organic residues: new precision using compound-specific carbon isotopes. Antiquity 82(317):702–713.Google Scholar
Cherkinsky, A. 2015. Review [Radiocarbon and Archaeology: An Archaeological Perspective, 2-nd edition. R.E. Taylor and Ofer Bar-Yosef.]. Journal of Anthropological Research 71(4):583–584.Google Scholar
Damon, PE, Donahue, DJ, Gore, BH, Hatheway, AL, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Sercel, PJ, Toolin, LJ, Bronk, CR, Hall, ET, Hedges, REM, Housley, R, Law, IA, Perry, C, Bonani, G, Trumbore, S, Woelfli, W, Ambers, JC, Bowman, SGE, Leese, MN, Tite, MS. 1989. Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin. Nature 337(6208):611–615.Google Scholar
Dorn, RI. 1998. Response to Beck et al. Science 280(5372):2136–2139.Google Scholar
Freer-Waters, RA, Jull, AJT. 2010. Investigating a dated piece of the Shroud of Turin. Radiocarbon 52(4):1521–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmin, YV. 2013. Origin of Old World pottery as viewed from the early 2010s: when, where and why? World Archaeology 45(4):539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmin, YV, Keates, SG, Shen, C. (editors). 2007. Origin and Spread of Microblade Technology in Northern Asia and North America. Burnaby, B.C.: Archaeology Press. 222 p.Google Scholar
Libby, WF, Anderson, EC, Arnold, JR. 1949. Age determination by radiocarbon content: world-wide assay of natural radiocarbon. Science 109(2827):227–228.Google Scholar
Meacham, W. 2007. The amazing Dr Kouznetsov. Antiquity 81(313):779–783.Google Scholar
Taylor, RE. 1987. Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 212 p.Google Scholar
Taylor, RE. 2014. Passing of the last of the three who established 14C dating: a historical footnote. Radiocarbon 56(3):913–921.Google Scholar