Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T21:39:42.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

D. V. Riordan
Affiliation:
New Craigs Hospital, 6–16 Leachkin Road, Inverness IV3 8NP UK. Email: Vincent.Riordan@haht.scot.nhs.uk
C. Stark
Affiliation:
New Craigs Hospital, 6–16 Leachkin Road, Inverness IV3 8NP UK. Email: Vincent.Riordan@haht.scot.nhs.uk
S. Selvaraj
Affiliation:
New Craigs Hospital, 6–16 Leachkin Road, Inverness IV3 8NP UK. Email: Vincent.Riordan@haht.scot.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007 

Dr Baig may be correct in reiterating the inherent weaknesses of longitudinal birth cohort studies, but we do not accept that it is premature to hypothesise. Future studies into these potentially important epidemiological trends will require modified study designs and therefore hypotheses to guide these. We have discussed a heterogeneous group of potential confounding and mediating factors, biological influences being just one possible aspect of what is probably a complex picture of multifactorial aetiology. Hypothesising about the exclusive involvement of biological factors would indeed be premature, but not to consider them at all would place undue restrictions on future study design.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.