Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:39:44.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND GRAIN YIELD STABILITY OF ETHIOPIAN WHITE LUPIN (LUPINUS ALBUS L.) LANDRACES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2017

MULUGETA ATNAF ,
DAGNE WEGARY ,
KIFLE DAGNE  and
KASSAHUN TESFAYE
MULUGETA ATNAF*
Affiliation:
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Pawe Research Center, P.O. Box 25, Pawe, Ethiopia CIMMYT-Ethiopia, ILRI Campus, CMC Road, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
DAGNE WEGARY
Affiliation:
CIMMYT-Ethiopia, ILRI Campus, CMC Road, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
KIFLE DAGNE
Affiliation:
Addis Ababa University, College of Natural Sciences, Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
KASSAHUN TESFAYE
Affiliation:
Addis Ababa University, College of Natural Sciences, Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
*
Corresponding author. Email: atnafmulugeta@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Genotype by environment interaction is a common phenomenon in crop production and remains an important issue in genotype evaluation and recommendation. However, no detailed multi-environment evaluation of Ethiopian white lupin has been undertaken so far. Thus, this study was undertaken with the objectives to evaluate the performance and stability of white lupin landraces in six locations; and characterize white lupin growing environments in Ethiopia. Twelve white lupin landrace collections of Ethiopia were evaluated across six different locations in Ethiopia during the 2014/15 main growing season using a randomized complete block design with four replications. The genotype main effect plus genotype by environment interaction (GGE) biplots analysis was used to visualize the patterns of the interaction components. The results depicted that the tested landraces had differential performances across locations implying the presence of crossover interaction. The first two principal components (PC1 = 41.6% and PC2 = 21.8%) of the GGE explained 63.4% of the GGE sum of squares. All test locations were found to be representative with different degrees of reliability whereby Finote Selam and Dibate were found to be most representative. In addition, all test locations, except Mandura and Injibara, had generally similar and good discriminating power. Finote Selam and Dibate were found to be the most representative and discriminating environments and are characterized as most desirable test locations for white lupin improvement in northwestern Ethiopia. G2 was found to be the highest yielding and most stable landrace across the test environments, and hence identified as most desirable genotype recommended for production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 54 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , pp. 943 - 956
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annicchiarico, P. and Carroni, A. M. (2009). Diversity of white and narrow-leafed lupin genotype adaptive response across climatically-contrasting Italian environments and implications for selection. Euphytica 166:71–81.Google Scholar
Annicchiarico, P., Harzic, N. and Carroni, A. M. (2010). Adaptation, diversity, and exploitation of global white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) landrace genetic resources. Field Crops Research 119 (1):114–124.Google Scholar
Atnaf, M., Kidane, S., Abadi, S. and Fiseha, Z. (2013). GGE biplots to analyze soybean multi-environment yield trial data in north western Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 5 (12):245–254.Google Scholar
Atnaf, M., Tesfaye, K., Dagne, K. and Wegary, D. (2015). Extent and pattern of genetic diversity in Ethiopian white lupin landraces for agronomical and phenological traits. African Crop Science Journal 23 (4):327–341.Google Scholar
Bob, F. and Mario, D'A. (2003). Matching lupin cultivars to environment in Western Australia. In Solutions for a Better Environment. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference, 2–6 February (Eds U. Murray and O'L. Garry). Victoria: Geelong.Google Scholar
Brar, K. S., Singh, P., Mittal, V. P., Singh, P., Jakhar, M. L., et al. (2010). GGE biplot analysis for visualization of mean performance and stability for seed yield in taramira at diverse locations in India. Journal of Oilseed Brassica 1 (2):66–74.Google Scholar
Christiansen, J. L., Raza, S., Jørnsgård, B., Mahmoud, S. and Ortiz, R. (2000). Potential of landrace germplasm for genetic enhancement of white lupin in Egypt. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47:425–430.Google Scholar
Comstock, R. E. and Moll, R. H. (1963). Genotype-environment Interactions. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding, 164–196 (Eds Hanson, W. D. and Robinson, H. F.). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council Publ.Google Scholar
Crossa, J., Cornelius, P. L. and Yan, W. (2002). Biplots linear-bilinear model for studying cross over genotype x environment interaction. Crop Science 42:619–633.Google Scholar
Ebdon, J. S. and Gauch, H. G. (2002). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: I. Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction. Crop Science 42:489–496.Google Scholar
Gauch, H. G. (2006). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science 46:1488–1500.Google Scholar
González, A. M., Monteagudo, A. B., Casquero, P. A., De Ron, A. M. and Santalla, M. (2006). Genetic variation and environmental effects on agronomical and commercial quality traits in the main European market classes of dry bean. Field Crops Research 95:336–347.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Andres, F., Casquero, P. A., San-Pedro, C. and Hernandez-Sanchez, E. (2007). Diversity in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) landraces from Northwest Iberian plateau. Genetic Resources and Evolution 54:27–44.Google Scholar
Huyghe, C. (1997). White lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Field Crops Research 53:147–160.Google Scholar
Julier, B., Huyghe, C., Papineau, J., Milford, G. F. J., Day, J. M., Billot, C. and Mangin, P. (1993). Seed yield and yield stability of determinate and indeterminate autumn-sown white lupins (Lupinus albus L.) grown at different locations in France and UK. The Journal of Agricultural Science 121:177–186.Google Scholar
Kurlovich, B. S. (2002). Lupins (Geography, Classification, Genetic Resources and Breeding). St. Petersburg, Russia: Publishing House “Intan”.Google Scholar
Rubio, J., Cubero, J. I., Martin, L. M., Suso, M. J. and Flores, F. (2004). Biplot analysis of trait relations of white lupin in Spain. Euphytica 135:217–224.Google Scholar
Sbabou, L., Brhada, F., Alami, I. T. and Maltouf, A. F. (2010). Genetic diversity of Moroccan Lupinus germplasm investigated using ISSR and AFLP markers. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12 (1):26–32.Google Scholar
Yan, W. (2001). GGE Biplot—A Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal 93:1111–1118.Google Scholar
Yan, W. (2014). Genotype-by-Location two-way data analysis. In Crop Variety Trials: Data Management and Analysis, 133–162 (Eds Yan, W.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, INC.Google Scholar
Yan, W. and Holland, J. B. (2010). A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica 171:355–369.Google Scholar
Yan, W., Hunt, L. A., Sheng, Q. and Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Science 40:597–605.Google Scholar
Yan, W. and Kang, M. S. (2003). GGE-Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Yan, W., Kang, M. S., Ma, B., Wood, S. and Cornelius, P. L. (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science 47:643–655.Google Scholar
Yan, W. and Rajcan, I. R. (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 42:11–20.Google Scholar
Yeheyis, L., Kijora, C., Solomon, M., Anteneh, G. and Peters, K. (2010). White lupin (Lupinus albus L.), the neglected multipurpose crop: Its production and utilization in the mixed crop-livestock farming system of Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (4). Available from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/4/yehe22074.Google Scholar
Yeheyis, L., Kijora, C., van Santen, E. and Peters, K. (2012). Sweet annual lupins (Lupinus spp.); their adaptability and productivity in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. Journal of Animal Science Advances 2 (2):201–215.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Atnaf et al supplementary material

Tables S1 and S2

Download Atnaf et al supplementary material(File)
File 14.7 KB