Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T11:51:18.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Microscopic Stress Fluctuations in Glass Transition and Glass Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

T. Egami
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Laboratory for Research on the Structure of Matter, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
V. Vitek
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Laboratory for Research on the Structure of Matter, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

Although the structure of liquids and glasses may appear highly disordered, the atomic motions in these phases are rather strongly correlated. Such a correlation, however, cannot be readily described by a pair density function, and higher order correlation functions are necessary. We suggest that the microscopic stresses defined at each atom are quite useful in describing such high order correlations. We discuss how the concept of the microscopic stress fluctuation helps to describe and understand the glass transition and glass formation phenomena. In a molecular dynamics study the local shear stresses were found to become orientationally correlated below a transition temperature, Ts, which is close to the melting temperature. Below Ts the viscosity shows a rapid increase and transverse phonons become more stable. Thus Ts could be viewed as a dynamical glass transition temperature. The conventional glass transition can be described in terms of the elastic percolation of the orientationally correlated regions. On the other hand, the microscopic stresses in the crystalline solid solutions define the topological stability limit of the crystalline phase, and predict the minimum solute concentration to form stable amorphous alloys.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basinski, Z. S., Duesberry, M. S., and Taylor, R. (1971). Can. J. Phys. 49, 2160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. and Huang, K. (1954). “Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices”, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Chen, S.-P., Egami, T., and Vitek, V. (1985). In “Rapidly Quenched Metals” (Steeb, S. and Warlimont, H. eds.), Vol. I, pp. 577, Elsevier Science Pbl., Lausanne.Google Scholar
Chen, S.-P., Egami, T., and Vitek, V. (1985b). J. Non-Cryst. Solids 75, 449.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. H. and Turnbull, D. (1959). J. Chem. Phys. 31, 1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egami, T. (1984). Rep. Prog. Phys. 47, 1601.Google Scholar
Egami, T., Maeda, K., and Vitek, V. (1980). Phil. Mag. a41, 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egami, T. and Srolovitz, D. (1982). J. Phys. F, 12, 2141.Google Scholar
Egami, T. and Waseda, Y. (1984). J. Non-Cryst. Solids 64, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eshelby, J. D. (1957). Proc. Roy. Soc. a241, 376.Google Scholar
Hafner, J. (1983). Phys. Rev. B27, 678.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. P. and McDonald, I. R. (1976). “Theory of Simple Liquids”, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lindemann, L. A. (1910). Z. Phys. 11, 609.Google Scholar
Massalski, T. B. (1982). In “Rapidly Quenched Metals IV” (Masumoto, T. and Suzuki, K., eds.) Vol I, pp. 203, Japan Inst. Metals, Sendai.Google Scholar
Srolovitz, D., Egami, T., and Vitek, V. (1981). Phys. Rev. B24, 6436.Google Scholar
Srolovitz, D., Vitek, V., and Egami, T. (1983). Acta Metall. 31, 335.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, P. J., Nelson, D. R., and Ronchetti, M. (1981). Phys. Rev. Lett. 47. 1297.Google Scholar
Turnbull, D. (1969). Contemp. Phys. 10, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitek, V., Chen, S.-P., and Egami, T. (1984). J. Non-Cryst. Solids 61/62, 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar