Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:22:59.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grain Boundary Analysis of Crept Alloy 617

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2012

Fan Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, U.S.A.
David P. Field
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Alloy 617, a high-temperature creep-resistant, nickel-based alloy, is being considered for the primary heat exchanger for the next generation nuclear plant, which is highly influenced by thermal creep. The main objective of this study is to inspect the crept grain boundaries under its imitated working condition, and to determine which boundaries are susceptible to damage and which are more resistant, in order to help improve its creep resistance in future manufacturing. Electron backscatter diffraction was used to measure the proportions of each boundary by observing and analyzing these crept microstructures. The grain-boundary distribution can be expressed in terms of five parameters including three parameters of lattice misorientation and two parameters of the grain-boundary plane normal. Three conditions were analyzed: the original material, metal that was annealed without stress, and ones that were crept at 1000ºC at 19 MPa and 25 MPa for various times. Though observation, it is found that the voids seldom occur at low angle grain boundaries, and coherent twin boundaries are also resist to creep damage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lbanez, A.R., Saxena, A. and Kang, J. D.: Strength Fract. Complex. Vol. 4 (2006), p. 75.Google Scholar
2. Lillo, T., Cole, J., Frary, M., Schlegel, S.: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, vol. 40, p.2803.Google Scholar
3. Sharma, S. K., Choi, J. W., Kang, K. J.: Adv. Mater. Research, 2007, vol. 26, pp. 233.Google Scholar
4. Ynag, S., Krupp, U., Christ, H., and Trindade, V. B.: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2005, vol. 7, pp. 723–26.Google Scholar
5. Schlegel, S., Hopkins, S., Young, E., Cole, J., Lillo, T., Frary, M.: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, vol. 40, p.2812.Google Scholar
6. Kim, W. G., Yin, S. N., Kim, Y. W., Ryu, W. S.: Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2010, vol.63, pp. 145150.Google Scholar
7. Skidmore, T., Buchheit, R. G., Juhas, M. C.: Acta Mater. Inc., 2004, vol, 50, pp. 873877.Google Scholar
8. Thomas, A., Wahabi, M. E., Cabrera, J. M., Prado, J. M.: Journal of Mater. Processing Tech., 2006, vol.177, pp. 469472.Google Scholar
9. Palumbo, G, King, PJ, Aust, KT, Erb, U, Lichtenberger, PC. Sci. Met. Mater., 1991 vol. 25, pp.:1775 Google Scholar
10. Randle, V., Journal of Microscopy, 2005, vol. 222, pp. 6975.Google Scholar
11. Sitzman, Scott D.: Proc. of SPIE Vol. 5392, pp7890.Google Scholar
12. Kim, C., Hu, Y., Rohrer, G. & Randle, V. Scripta Mater. 2005, Vol. 52, pp. 633637.Google Scholar
13. Randle, V., Acta Mater., 1997, vol. 46, p 4159.Google Scholar
14. Larsen, R.J. and Adams, B.L.: Proc. Plasticity ’02, Khan, A.S. and Lopez-Pamies, O., eds., Neat Press, Fulton, MD, 2002, pp. 2729.Google Scholar
15. Field, D.P., Adams, B.L.: Met. Trans. A. 1992. Vol. 23, pp. 25152516.Google Scholar
16. Saylor, D.M., El-Dasher, B.S., Adams, B.L. and Rohrer, G.S., Metall. Mater. Trans. A Vol. 35, pp. 19811989, DOI: 10.1007/s11661-004-0147-z Google Scholar
17. Bunge, H. J, Matls Sci Forum, Vols. 157-162 (1994) p. 13 Google Scholar
18. Randle, V.: The Measurement of Grain Boundary Geometry, Institute of Physics Publishing, Philadelphia, PA, 1993.Google Scholar