No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Reformation, Revival, and Rebirth in Anglican Evangelical Thought, c.1780–c.1830
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
For Anglican Evangelicals, terms like ‘awakening’ and ‘revival’ pointed rather to reinvigoration and the recovery of old glories than to some new and disturbing disjunction. Those seeking change, remarked Rowland Hill, would do well to follow the example of the reformers, who ‘did not innovate, but renovate, they did not institute, they only reformed.’ Nevertheless, this still left many – like Hill -balancing their urge to reform on the one hand with the importance of Anglican ‘regularity’ on the other. Several initiatives bore the mark of this tension. For example, the foundation of the Church Missionary Society (CMS) in 1799 owed much to frustration with the inactivity of the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge (SPCK) and the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel (SPG). The new society was ‘founded upon the Church-principle, not the High Church principle’, remarked John Venn, who stressed that it was possible to express Gospel zeal within a solidly Anglican framework. As the Missionary Magazine commented perceptively, ‘a set of people will no doubt contribute to this whose predilection for the Church and dislike to Methodists and Dissenters, would have effectively kept them from aiding the [London Missionary Society]’. The Christian Observer, founded in 1802 to be the periodical mouthpiece of ‘moderate’ Evangelicalism, evinced the same concerns in its first number, when it promised ‘to correct the false sentiments of the religious world, and to explain the principles of the Church’. As the leading Evangelical ‘regulars’ maintained, only this uneasy balancing act could bring far-reaching change.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Studies in Church History , Volume 44: Revival and Resurgence in Christian History , 2008 , pp. 164 - 174
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2008
References
1 It is worth pointing out that ‘evangelical’ is used here as a general term, referring to adherents of all denominations, whereas the capitalized ‘Evangelical’ denotes members of the Church of England holding similar theological doctrine.
2 Sidney, Edwin, The Life of the Rev. Rowland Hill (London, 1834), 398 Google Scholar.
3 Hole, Charles, The Early History of the Church Missionary Society (London, 1896), 31 Google Scholar.
4 Missionary Magazine, 20 May 1799.
5 J. and J. P. Pratt, Memoir of the Rev. Josiah Pratt (London, 1849), 11.
6 Hole, Early History, 54.
7 Sidney, Rowland Hill, 382.
8 Jerram, James, ed., The Memoirs & a Selection from the Letters of the late Rev. Charles Jerram, MA. (London, 1855), 336 Google Scholar.
9 Smyth, Charles, Simeon and Church Order (Cambridge, 1940), 249, 256 Google Scholar.
10 Hennell, Michael M., John Venn and the Clapham Sect (London, 1958), 268–73 Google Scholar.
11 Sidney, Edwin, The Life, Ministry, & Selections from the Remains, of the Rev. Samuel Walker (London 1835), 280 Google Scholar.
12 Ibid., 279.
13 Jaeger, Muriel, Before Victoria: Changing Standards and Behaviour, 1787–1837 (2nd edn, London, 1967)Google Scholar; Perkin, Harold, The Origins of Modem English Society, 1780–1880 (London, 1969)Google Scholar.
14 Wahrman, Dror, ‘Percy’s Prologue: from Gender Play to Gender Panic in Eighteenth-Century England’, P&P 159 (1998), 113–60 Google Scholar; Innes, Joanna, ‘Politics and Morals: the Reformation of Manners Movement in Later Eighteenth-Century England’, in Hellmuth, Eckhardt, ed., The Transformation of Political Culture: England and Germany in the late Eighteenth Century (Oxford, 1990), 57–118 Google Scholar.
15 Brown, Ford K., Fathers of the Victorians (Cambridge, 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hilton, Boyd, The Age of Atonement: the Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1785–1865 (Oxford, 1988)Google Scholar; Young, G. M., Victorian England: Portrait of an Age (London, 1936)Google Scholar.
16 See esp. Brown, Fathers of the Victorians, for an exhaustive and often caustic commentary on the evangelical reforming urge.
17 Wilberforce, William, A Practical View of the Prevailing Religious System of Professed Christians, in the Higher and Middle Classes in this Country, Contrasted with Real Christianity (London, 1797), viii Google Scholar.
18 Vaughan, E. T., Some Account of the Life, Ministry, Character, & Writings of the late Rev. T. Robinson, M.A. (London, 1815), 131 Google Scholar.
19 Walsh, John D., ‘The Yorkshire Evangelicals in the Eighteenth Century, with Especial Reference to Methodism’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1956, 214–32 Google Scholar; Clark, J. C. D., English Society, 1660–1832 (Cambridge, 2000), 296–300 Google Scholar; Carter, Grayson, Anglican Evangelicals: Protestant Secessions from the Via Media, c.1800–1810 (Oxford, 2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar).
20 Overton, John H., The English Church in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1894), 51–109 Google Scholar; Hole, , Early History, Stock, Eugene, The History of the Church Missionary Society, 4 vols (London, 1899–1916)Google Scholar.
21 Smyth, Simeon and Church Order. See also idem, ‘The Evangelical Movement in Perspective’, Cambridge Historical Journal 7 (1941–3), 160–74, which poses a succession of pertinent questions about the place of Evangelicals in the Church of England, several of which remain unanswered.
22 Best, G. F. A., ‘The Evangelicals and the Established Church in the Early Nineteenth Century’, Journal of Theological Studies, ns 10 (1959), 63–78, at 71 Google Scholar.
23 Until the publication of John Wolffe, The Expansion of Evangelicalism, 1790–1840 (forthcoming), Carter, Anglican Evangelicals, provides the most pertinent and up-to-date bibliography.
24 The only existing work focusing on Evangelicals and history writing – a neglected aspect of the ‘serious’ worldview, considering their predilection for history as a genre – is John D. Walsh, Joseph Milner’s Evangelical Church History’,JEH 10 (1959), 174–87.
25 Stephen, James, Essays in Ecclesiastical Biography, 2 vols (London, 1849), 2: 58 Google Scholar.
26 Jerram, Memoirs, 296.
27 Interestingly, Milner had already tried to counter the claims of Gibbon and Hume concerning Christianity and the past. See Joseph Milner, Gibbon’s account of Christianity considered: together with some strictures on Hume’s dialogues concerning natural religion (London and York, 1781).
28 Milner, Joseph, The History of the Church of Christ, 6 vols (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1800), ix–x Google Scholar.
29 Walsh, ‘Milner’s Church History’, 186.
30 Overton, John, The True Churchman Ascertained (2nd edn, York, 1802), 14 Google Scholar.
31 Sidney, Edwin, The Life of Sir Richard Hill (London, 1839), 448 Google Scholar; Brown, , Fathers of the Victorians, 172 Google Scholar; see ibid. ch. 5 for a more detailed account of the controversy between the Anti-Jacobin Reviewers and the Evangelicals.
32 Overton, , True Churchman, 103–4, 106 Google Scholar.
33 Bean, James, Zeal Without Innovation (London, 1808)Google Scholar.
34 Sidney, , Samuel Walker, 380 Google Scholar.
35 Bean, , Zeal Without Innovation, x–xi Google Scholar.
36 Wilberforce, , Practical View, 273 Google Scholar.
37 Brown, Abner William, Recollections of the Conversation Parties of the Rev. Charles Simeon (London, 1868), 62 Google Scholar. Simeon, , Cecil and other regulars were wont to exult in ‘the excellencies of our truly evangelical liturgy’. See also Smyth, , Simeon and Church Order, 291, 9 Google Scholar.
38 Vaughan, , Some Account, 57–8 Google Scholar.
39 Pratt, Josiah, The Works of the Rev. Richard Cecil, 3 vols (2nd edn, London, 1816), vol. ?: 38 Google Scholar.
40 Grimshawe, T. S., Memoir of Legh Richmond (London, 1827), 252 Google Scholar.
41 Carter, , Anglican Evangelicals, 29 Google Scholar.
42 Milner, Joseph, Reflections on Ecclesiastical Establishments (London, 1835), 8 Google Scholar.
43 Eph. 4:1.
44 The subject finds some mention in Toon, Peter, Evangelical Theology 1833–1856: a Response to Tractarianism (London, 1979), 43 Google Scholar.
45 Burns, Arthur, ‘English “Church Reform” Revisited, 1780–1840’, in Burns, Arthur and Innes, Joanna, eds, Rethinking the Age of Reform (Cambridge, 2003), 136–62, at 154–7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
46 Sidney, , Samuel Walker, 282–3 Google Scholar.