Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T04:45:41.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insights into migratory connectivity and conservation concerns of Red Knots Calidris canutus in the austral Pacific coast of the Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2021

CAMILA GHERARDI-FUENTES ,
JORGE RUIZ  and
JUAN G. NAVEDO Open the ORCID record for JUAN G. NAVEDO [Opens in a new window]
CAMILA GHERARDI-FUENTES
Affiliation:
Bird Ecology Lab, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile. Programa de Doctorado en Biología Marina, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile.
JORGE RUIZ
Affiliation:
Bird Ecology Lab, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile. Estación Experimental Quempillén (Chiloé), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile.
JUAN G. NAVEDO*
Affiliation:
Bird Ecology Lab, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile. Estación Experimental Quempillén (Chiloé), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile.
*
*Author for correspondence; email: jgnavedo@uach.cl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Migratory species rely on several distant sites during the annual cycle which makes their conservation more complex than that of non-migratory species. Even one of the most extensively studied migratory shorebirds - the Red Knot Calidris canutus - is currently ‘Near Threatened’ at the global level. Conflicting observations of migratory routes cast uncertainty on the subspecies classification and migratory connectivity of Red Knots in the Pacific coasts of the Americas. To fill essential information gaps, we present the first detailed population morphometrics of Red Knots during the non-breeding season in the southern Pacific coast, along with resightings of these birds throughout the Americas. We also estimated daily rate of weight gain during fuelling based on body mass at captures and known departure dates. Resightings demonstrate reliance on staging areas in both the Mid-continental and Atlantic flyways during the northward migration, and additionally in the Pacific Flyway during southward migration. In addition to the strong connection with several areas also used by C. c. rufa on the North American Atlantic coast, our results show morphometric differences within the ranges of both C. c. rufa and C. c. roselaari. Given the threats faced by Red Knots, the population in Chiloé Archipelago should be treated as a separate conservation unit within interhemispheric conservation programmes for endangered shorebirds within the Americas.

Keywords

Conservation unitChiloéCalidris canutus rufaCalidris canutus roselaari

Information

Type
Short Communication
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 223 - 231
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International

Introduction

Conservation of migratory species relying on several distant sites during the annual cycle is much more complex than that of non-migratory species (Runge et al. Reference Runge, Martin, Possingham, Willis and Fuller2014). For example, despite growing international commitments, dedicated funding, and conservation efforts (e.g. Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network; WHSRN), shorebirds in the Americas still experience steep population declines. A recent review found an overall reduction in abundance of 37.4% since 1970, with 68% of species (n = 44) declining (Rosenberg et al. Reference Rosenberg, Dokter, Blancher, Sauer, Smith, Smith, Stanton, Panjabi, Helft, Parr and Marra2019). Although some proximate causes of these declines are known (Baker et al. Reference Baker, González, Piersma, Niles, de Lima Serrano do Nascimiento, Atkinson, Clark, Minton, Peck and Aarts2004) and site-specific adaptive management plans are implemented (McGowan et al. Reference McGowan, Smith, Nichols, Lyons, Sweka, Kalasz, Niles, Wong, Brust, Davis and Spear2015), there is an urgent need for holistic conservation plans which consider the full life cycle (Navedo and Ruiz Reference Navedo and Ruiz2020), including at the subspecies/population level, to better address the drivers of migratory shorebird declines.

The Red Knot Calidris canutus is one of the most extensively studied shorebird species (Thomas et al. Reference Thomas, Székely and Sutherland2003) and is currently ‘Near Threatened’ at the global level (BirdLife International 2018). Within the Americas the situation for two out of three extant C. canutus subspecies is worsening in terms of population size and rate of decrease (U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan Partnership 2016). C. c. roselaari breeds in Alaska and Wrangel island (Russia) and migrates along the Pacific coast to spend the non-breeding season mainly in Mexico (Carmona et al. Reference Carmona, Arce, Ayala-Perez, Hernández-Alvarez, Buchanan, Salzer, Tomkovich, Johnson, Gill, McCaffery, Lyons, Niles and Newstead2014). Although highly fluctuating in annual numbers (Carmona et al. Reference Carmona, Arce, Ayala-Pérez and Danemann2008) the total population is estimated to be 17,000 birds (Andres et al. Reference Andres, Smith, Morrison, Gratto-Trevor, Brown and Friis2012) and is classified as ‘endangered’ in Mexico (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales 2010) and ‘greatest concern’ in USA (U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan Partnership 2016). The bulk of roselaari knots winter in Baja California and the Gulf of California (Carmona et al. Reference Carmona, Arce, Ayala-Perez, Hernández-Alvarez, Buchanan, Salzer, Tomkovich, Johnson, Gill, McCaffery, Lyons, Niles and Newstead2014), as well as other areas of the Mexican Pacific coasts where relevant numbers have been reported (Arce et al. Reference Arce, Carmona, Miramontes, Ayala-Pérez, Hernández-Avarez and and Mendoza2015). However, it is unclear whether small groups of knots present elsewhere along the Pacific coast of Central and South America belong to this subspecies. While Carmona et al. (Reference Carmona, Arce, Ayala-Perez, Hernández-Alvarez, Buchanan, Salzer, Tomkovich, Johnson, Gill, McCaffery, Lyons, Niles and Newstead2014) stated that all these groups belong to rufa subspecies, geolocator information retrieved from one bird in a study based in Texas has shown that at least some of these birds are apparently C. c. roselaari - one bird made a non-stop flight of 6 days (8,100 km) from Chiloé (Southern Pacific Coast, Chile) to Texas, then continued onwards to Alaska to breed (Newstead et al. Reference Newstead, Niles, Porter, Dey, Burger and Fitzsimmons2013). By contrast, at least two knots spending the non-breeding season at Chiloé were resighted in the eastern North Atlantic Coasts during northward migration, one in South Carolina (Navedo and Gutiérrez Reference Navedo and Gutiérrez2019) and another in Georgia (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Andres, Sitters, Valenzuela, Niles, Dey, Peck and Espinosa2007), and two birds from Delaware Bay were also resighted in Chiloé (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Andres, Sitters, Valenzuela, Niles, Dey, Peck and Espinosa2007), all these birds most probably belonging to C. c. rufa.

C. c. rufa breeds in the Canadian Arctic and spends the non-breeding season in four distinct areas: south-eastern USA and the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico (Newstead et al. Reference Newstead, Niles, Porter, Dey, Burger and Fitzsimmons2013), north-eastern Brazil, and along the Argentine Patagonia coast and Tierra del Fuego (Argentina and Chile) (Niles et al. Reference Niles, Sitters, Dey, Atkinson, Baker, Bennett, Carmona, Clark, Clark, Espoz, González, Harrington, Hernández, Kalasz, Lathrop, Matus, Minton, Morrison, Peck, Pitts, Robinson and Serrano2008). Based in isotopic signatures, a small proportion of birds has an unknown non-breeding site (Atkinson et al. Reference Atkinson, Baker, Bevan, Clark, Cole, González, Newton, Niles and Robinson2005). The combined populations of southeast USA, the Caribbean and Brazil has been estimated as a minimum of 20,800 birds (Lyons et al. Reference Lyons, Winn, Keyes and Kalasz2018), the north-west Gulf of Mexico as 2,000 (Andres et al. Reference Andres, Smith, Morrison, Gratto-Trevor, Brown and Friis2012) and Tierra del Fuego as 13,000 birds (in 2012; Baker et al. Reference Baker, Gonzalez, Morrison, Harrington and Billerman2020). The last population estimate of the rufa subspecies was 42,000 (Andres et al. Reference Andres, Smith, Morrison, Gratto-Trevor, Brown and Friis2012). C. c. rufa has been classified as ’endangered’ in Canada (BirdLife International 2018) and ‘threatened’ in the USA (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2015).

An additional regular non-breeding area was recently reported in Chiloé Archipelago (42°S, Chile) (Navedo and Gutiérrez Reference Navedo and Gutiérrez2019), a Site of Hemispheric Importance for the conservation of migratory shorebirds (Humedales Orientales de Chiloé; WHSRN 2011) due to its large numbers of Hudsonian Godwit Limosa haemastica and Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus (Andres et al. Reference Andres, Johnson, Valenzuela, Morrison, Espinosa and Ross2009). Despite the worrying situation of Red Knots in the Americas and the documented presence of knots in Chiloé (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Andres, Sitters, Valenzuela, Niles, Dey, Peck and Espinosa2007), this taxon was neither mentioned in the dedicated conservation plan for migratory shorebirds at Chiloé (Delgado et al. Reference Delgado, Sepúlveda and Álvarez2010) nor later considered as a conservation target in this WHSRN site (WHSRN 2011). At least c. 150 Red Knots regularly occupy two studied bays of the main island, one in the north and the other in the central-east coast, showing very high local site fidelity, both intra- and inter- seasonally (Navedo and Gutiérrez Reference Navedo and Gutiérrez2019). Resightings in Chiloé of birds ringed in the Gulf of Mexico (Texas and Louisiana, USA) support strong migratory connectivity between both areas (Navedo and Gutiérrez Reference Navedo and Gutiérrez2019). One additional resighting in Chiloé of a knot ringed in South Carolina and another ringed in Argentina (Navedo and Gutiérrez Reference Navedo and Gutiérrez2019), along with resightings of knots banded in Delaware, and one of two knots banded on Chiloé and resighted in Georgia, respectively (J. Johnson unpubl. data in Andres et al. Reference Andres, Smith, Morrison, Gratto-Trevor, Brown and Friis2012), support a connection with traditional staging sites of migrating rufa in the Atlantic coasts. Therefore, current knowledge reflects the uncertainty regarding the classification and conservation of knots spending the non-breeding season at the Pacific coasts of South America. This uncertainty raises the question of whether those spending the non-breeding season at Chiloé should be considered as a separate conservation unit. It is thus crucial to characterize this endangered migratory population at Chiloé while it is still abundant to identify main threats and establish conservation strategies before it is too late (Wilcove and Wikelski Reference Wilcove and Wikelski2008).

Here we present the first detailed population morphometrics and molecular sexing of captured and ringed Red Knots during the non-breeding season in Chiloé trying to provide insights that can be useful for their conservation. In addition, we compile resightings of these birds outside of Chiloé to improve the understanding of migratory connectivity of one of the most endangered shorebird species within the Americas.

Methods

Knots were captured in the north of Chiloé main Island (41°49 S, 73°63 W) during the austral summer of 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20, in two different periods (November and March). Birds were captured at high tide using cannon nets and maintained in cages until being processed, following approved bioethics protocol and animal capture permissions. Birds were ringed with a metallic ring and an engraved-red PVC flag. Each bird was weighed and morphological measurements (bill length, head-bill length, wing cord, ‘maximum tarsus’ length; (Redfern and Clark Reference Redfern and Clark2001)) were taken, always by the same researcher. Age class was determined based on the plumage at capture: 1) yearlings: one-year-old birds hatched the same or previous year (i.e. in their first or second calendar year); 2) adults: birds at least two-years-old (i.e. third calendar year or older) (Pyle Reference Pyle2008, Baker et al. Reference Baker, Gonzalez, Morrison, Harrington and Billerman2020, Martínez-Curci et al. Reference Martínez-Curci, Isacch, D’Amico, Rojas and Castresana2020). A blood sample was taken from the jugular vein (~ 0.7 ml, < 1% of body weight) and kept in an Eppendorf tube with 96% ethanol at 4°C. Birds were then molecularly sexed using primers P0, P2, and P8 (Griffiths et al. Reference Griffiths, Double, Orr and Dawson1998, Han et al. Reference Han, Kim, Kim, Park and Na2009).

Morphometrics were compared by sex, and adult weight was compared by period (i.e. ‘maintenance’ (November) and ‘pre-migratory fuelling’ (March), since weight varies significantly during the non-breeding season) and sex through analyses of variance (ANOVA). All analyses were done in R (R Core Team 2020).

We also estimated expected daily rate of weight gain during fuelling by first discarding from the analysis six individuals with no external signs of alternate breeding plumage in March, as well as yearlings, because they probably aborted migration (e.g. Martínez-Curci et al. Reference Martínez-Curci, Isacch, D’Amico, Rojas and Castresana2020). With departure dates from Chiloé concentrated in the second week of April (J. G. Navedo pers. obs.), we assumed knots at Chiloé keep fuelling at a similar rate of daily weight gain to reach a departure mass over 210–230 g, similar to C. c. canutus in South Africa that have to fly 6,000 km up to their first staging site in Guinea-Bissau (Summers et al. Reference Summers, Underhill, Waltner and Swann2010). For knots to achieve this departure mass in c.30 days from capture in early March, we estimated daily mass gains using as reference the average body mass of the five lightest and five heaviest birds in those captures (following Hua et al. Reference Hua, Piersma and Ma2013).

We then compiled all resightings of these PVC-flagged birds obtained from scientists and birdwatchers (see Acknowledgements) from May 2017 up to May 2020 to increase understanding of migratory connectivity in this population. Photos of all but one resighted individuals from Chiloé preclude misidentifications (see Tucker et al. Reference Tucker, McGowan, Robinson, Clark, Lyons, DeRose-Wilson, du Feu, Austin, Atkinson and Clark2019).

Results

A total of 42 knots (18 females and 22 males, 2 not sexed; 39 adults, 3 yearlings) were captured. Males were smaller than females in all measurements, and we found significant differences in bill length and head-bill, but not in tarsus length or wing chord (Table 1). Body weight in the maintenance period were on average (± SD) 115.0 ± 3.72 (range 110.5–120.5, n = 7) for females and 109.6 ± 4.5 (range 103.4–116.5, n = 6) for males, while it reached 139.3 ± 7.0 (range 126.6–166.6, n = 11) in females and 125.5 ± 9.3 (range 103.6–62.0, n = 15) in males captured during the pre-migratory fuelling period. We found differences in body weight both in females and males (ANOVA, F1,16 = 23.75, adjusted R2 = 0.57, P < 0.05), and between periods (ANOVA, F1,19 = 7.776, adjusted R2 = 0.25, P < 0.05), with females being slightly heavier than males in the pre-migratory fuelling period (ANOVA, F1,23 = 6.90, adjusted R2 = 0.20, P = 0.01), but not in the maintenance period (ANOVA, F1,11 = 3.99, adjusted R2 = 0.19, P = 0.07).

Table 1.

Morphometrics (in mm) of Red Knots captured in Chiloé Archipelago. We present the mean and standard deviation (SD), range of values, and sample size (n). Results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) are presented with F and P values.

With birds weighing between 123.2 g and 153.2 g respectively in early March, the expected daily mass gain during the fuelling period before departing by the second week of April ranged between 2.9 and 3.6 g per day for the lightest birds, and between 1.9 and 2.6 g for the heaviest ones.

We ringed a total of 37 birds, from which 24 have been resighted, all but one in Caulín bay or in a nearby (10 km distant) bay. Three of the 13 birds which have never been seen again in Chiloé were resighted in other countries (Perú, Guatemala, and USA). In addition, we have received 12 resightings of individual Red Knots across the Americas (Figure 1). During northward migration two individuals were separately resighted in Paracas, Perú, on different occasions in early and late May, the latter bird resighted again there in mid-July. There were resightings of different knots in the coasts of the Gulf of Mexico from late April until the end of May. In late May there were also resightings inland in North America, both in lakes of Minnesota, USA, and Manitoba, Canada. During southward migration there were fewer resightings. One knot was observed in Florida, USA, in late April and then again in August, where it was resighted multiple times throughout at least 15 days. Other two knots were resighted in early September in Escuintla, Guatemala, and in Esmeraldas, Ecuador.

Figure 1.

Resightings of Red Knots banded in Chiloé Archipelago, Chile. Light dots represent resightings during northward migration, dark dots represent resightings during southward migration, and the star represents non-breeding area in Chiloé. Each number corresponds to: 1) Chiloé, Chile; 2) Yucatán, México; 3) Texas, USA; 4) Louisiana, USA; 5) Florida, USA; 6) Paracas, Perú; 7) Minnesota, USA; 8) Manitoba, Canada; 9) Escuintla, Guatemala; 10) Esmeraldas, Ecuador.

Discussion

Our results provide first detailed morphometrics of the Red Knot population spending the non-breeding season in Chiloé Archipelago. In addition, multiple resightings during both northward and southward migration periods helped to increase our understanding of migratory connectivity of an endangered species within the Americas.

Comparatively, Chiloé knots had bill length values within the ranges reported for rufa and roselaari knots captured in other non-breeding areas (Table 2). Bill length and head-bill length varied between sexes, which has been described for both subspecies (Baker et al. Reference Baker, Gonzalez, Morrison, Harrington and Billerman2020). Males and females showed similar weights during the maintenance period and significantly increased during the pre-migratory fuelling period, as expected in long-distance migrant shorebirds preparing for a non-stop endurance flight, with larger females being slightly heavier than males. Our estimated daily mass gains during fuelling are high, but similar to those of Red Knots fuelling in high-latitude non-breeding sites (reviewed in Piersma et al. Reference Piersma, Rogers, González, Zwarts, Niles, de Lima Serrano Do Nascimiento, Minton, Baker, Greenberg and Marra2004), and probably can be reached at least by competitive individuals attaining high intake rates given the comparatively high prey biomass available in Chiloé intertidal areas (Micael and Navedo Reference Micael and Navedo2018).

Knots banded in Chiloé were resighted early during the northward migration period mainly in the Gulf of Mexico, at coastal wetland staging areas in Texas and Louisiana (USA) (Navedo and Gutiérrez Reference Navedo and Gutiérrez2019). Individuals with adequate body condition seem to make a non-stop flight of several days from Chiloé to Texas (e.g. Newstead et al. Reference Newstead, Niles, Porter, Dey, Burger and Fitzsimmons2013), probably by flying under favourable wind conditions as do other knots (e.g. Tomkovich et al. Reference Tomkovich, Porter, Loktionov and Niles2013), since this distance surpasses the theoretical limits of non-stop power flight for the species (Hedenström Reference Hedenström2010). However, our earliest resighting in Yucatán Península suggests that at least some birds stop over before finally crossing the Gulf. Resightings in Paracas, 3,000 km from Chiloé, one of them a bird seen in late May and again in mid-July, might alternatively suggest individuals that entered in an oversummering stage (e.g. Navedo and Ruiz Reference Navedo and Ruiz2020, Martínez-Curci et al. Reference Martínez-Curci, Isacch, D’Amico, Rojas and Castresana2020). The northernmost resightings, one in Minnesota (USA) and the other in Manitoba (Canada), indicate that some birds migrate further north through the Mid-Continental Flyway, as do other Red Knots that spent the non-breeding season in north-west Gulf of Mexico (Newstead et al. Reference Newstead, Niles, Porter, Dey, Burger and Fitzsimmons2013). However, this does not give clear support about the breeding destination of the birds since this flyway is also used by other shorebirds that breed in different areas along the Arctic (e.g. Senner Reference Senner2012, Farmer et al. Reference Farmer, Holames, Pitelka and Billerman2020, Parmelee Reference Parmelee, Poole, Stettenheim and Gill2020), including both the breeding grounds of rufa in central Canadian Arctic (Lathrop et al. Reference Lathrop, Niles, Smith, Peck, Dey, Sacatelli and Bognar2018) and roselaari in Alaska (Tomkovich and Dondua Reference Tomkovich and Dondua2008). By contrast, the scarce resightings of these knots during northward migration in eastern Atlantic coasts (Georgia, Delaware Bay) (see also Navedo and Gutiérrez Reference Navedo and Gutiérrez2019), when resighting efforts are intensive (e.g. Tucker et al. Reference Tucker, McGowan, Robinson, Clark, Lyons, DeRose-Wilson, du Feu, Austin, Atkinson and Clark2019), suggest that C. c. rufa knots that spent the non-breeding season in Chiloé may follow a different route to the Arctic.

A resighting in Florida during southward migration period matched with a staging site used by rufa knots en route through the Atlantic coasts to Brazil and Tierra del Fuego (Baker et al. Reference Baker, Gonzalez, Morrison, Harrington and Billerman2020). In this light, the resightings of two individuals obtained from Guatemala and Ecuador (Pacific Flyway) in this period are noticeable given the fact of a bird breeding in Alaska and using wetlands within Pacific coasts en route to Chiloé (D. Newstead pers. comm.), thus not belonging to rufa subspecies. Molecular analyses, isotopic signatures and individual GPS tracking would decipher this surprisingly complex subspecific puzzle (Buehler and Baker Reference Buehler and Baker2005, Carmona et al. Reference Carmona, Arce, Ayala-Perez, Hernández-Alvarez, Buchanan, Salzer, Tomkovich, Johnson, Gill, McCaffery, Lyons, Niles and Newstead2014) concerning knots that spend the non-breeding season in the Austral Pacific coasts of Americas.

Conservation implications

Resightings of knots out of Chiloé suggest that several individuals fly non-stop the impressive distance of 8,000 km to the main staging area in the Gulf of Mexico, supporting previous results (Navedo and Gutiérrez Reference Navedo and Gutiérrez2019, Newstead et al. Reference Newstead, Niles, Porter, Dey, Burger and Fitzsimmons2013), only comparable to the extreme 10,100 km non-stop flight by the rogersi subspecies from New Zealand to China (Tomkovich et al. Reference Tomkovich, Porter, Loktionov and Niles2013). Besides the strong connection with some areas used by rufa subspecies in the Atlantic, our results show morphometric differences within the ranges of both rufa and roselaari. Although our small sample size presents some limitations to reach robust conclusions, individuals with retrieved geolocators (Newstead et al. Reference Newstead, Niles, Porter, Dey, Burger and Fitzsimmons2013) and specific resightings shows that the Chiloé non-breeding population is composed of different subspecies.

In this light, in Chile C. c. rufa is classified as ‘endangered’ (Inventario Nacional de Especies de Chile 2008) and C. c. roselaari is not reported. Given the threats faced by rufa subspecies (Niles et al. Reference Niles, Sitters, Dey, Atkinson, Baker, Bennett, Carmona, Clark, Clark, Espoz, González, Harrington, Hernández, Kalasz, Lathrop, Matus, Minton, Morrison, Peck, Pitts, Robinson and Serrano2008), and the crucial importance of maintaining the most diverse genetic pool in highly endangered migratory species (Wilcove and Wikelski Reference Wilcove and Wikelski2008), the population in Chiloé Archipelago should be treated as a separate conservation unit within interhemispheric conservation programmes for endangered shorebirds within the Americas. It is urgent to assess main threats (e.g. Navedo et al. Reference Navedo, Verdugo, Rodríguez-Jorquera, Abad-Gómez, Suazo, Castañeda, Araya, Ruiz and Gutiérrez2019), overall population abundance, and trends to design adequate conservation plans in bays used by this qualitatively important but poorly understood population of Red Knots.

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Verdugo, E. Basso, V. Araya, G. Biscarra, C. Navarrete, G. Torres-Fuentes, N. Martínez-Curci, J.M. Abad-Gómez, J.S. Gutiérrez, J.A. Masero and everyone in the Bird Ecology Lab who assisted in fieldwork. We also thank Jorge Valenzuela and CECPAN members for their long-last support at Chiloé. César Mansilla helped us to carry out fieldwork. Tyler McFadden helped edit the English language. We thank E. Pacheco (Yucatán, Mexico); D. Newstead (Texas, USA); E. Ortiz, R. Huayanca and Y. Tenorio (Paracas, Perú); E. Gallien and R. Russell (Minnesota, USA); D. LeBlanc, C. Wright and B. Keeler (Louisiana, USA); R. Ahlman (Esmeraldas, Ecuador); M.T. Smith, J. Hall, A. DiNuovo and J. Hall (Florida, USA); V. Sagastume (Escuintla, Guatemala), I. Ward and Donna Danyluk (Manitoba, CA) for their resightings of Chiloé Red Knots along the Americas. Comments by V. D´Amico and P. Atkinson greatly improved the manuscript. Captures and banding were made under bioethics approval #260/2016 from UACh and permissions #5932/2016 from SAG, Gobierno de Chile. CGF was funded by CONICYT grant #21180828 during writing. All fieldwork and analyses were funded by FONDECYT #1161224 (JGN).

References

Andres, B. A., Johnson, J. A., Valenzuela, J., Morrison, R. I. G., Espinosa, L. A. and Ross, R. K. (2009) Estimating Eastern Pacific coast populations of whimbrels and Hudsonian godwits, with an emphasis on Chiloé Island, Chile. Waterbirds 32: 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andres, B. A., Smith, P. A., Morrison, R. I. G., Gratto-Trevor, C. L., Brown, S. C. and Friis, C. A. (2012) Population estimates of North American shorebirds, 2012. Population estimates of North American shorebirds, 2012. Wader Study Group Bull. 119: 178–194.Google Scholar
Arce, N., Carmona, R., Miramontes, E., Ayala-Pérez, V., Hernández-Avarez, A. and Mendoza, L. F. (2015) An overwintering group of Red Knots Calidris canutus roselaari in Las Garzas Lagoon, Nayarit, Mexico. Wader Study Group Bull. 122: 135–141.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P. W., Baker, A. J., Bevan, R. M., Clark, N. A., Cole, K. B., González, P. M., Newton, J., Niles, L. J. and Robinson, R. A. (2005) Unravelling the migration and moult strategies of a long-distance migrant using stable isotopes: Red Knot Calidris canutus movements in the Americas. Ibis 147: 738–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. J., González, P. M., Piersma, T., Niles, L. J., de Lima Serrano do Nascimiento, I., Atkinson, P. W., Clark, N. A., Minton, C. D. T., Peck, M. K. and Aarts, G. (2004) Rapid population decline in red knots: fitness consequences in Delaware Bay. Proc. R. Soc. B. 271: 875–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, A., Gonzalez, P., Morrison, R. I. G. and Harrington, B. A. (2020) Red Knot (Calidris canutus), version 1.0. In Billerman, S. M., ed. Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Accessed online on 5 June 2020. doi: 10.2173/bow.redkno.01.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2018) Calidris canutus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T22693363A132285482. Accessed online on June 22nd 2020.Google Scholar
Buehler, D. M. and Baker, A. J. (2005) Population divergence times and historical demography in red knots and dunlins. Condor 107: 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmona, R., Arce, N., Ayala-Pérez, V. and Danemann, G. (2008) Abundance and phenology of Red Knots in the Guerrero Negro – Ojo de Liebre coastal lagoon complex, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Wader Study Group Bull. 115: 10–15.Google Scholar
Carmona, R., Arce, N., Ayala-Perez, V., Hernández-Alvarez, A., Buchanan, J. B., Salzer, L. J., Tomkovich, P. S., Johnson, J. A., Gill, R. E., McCaffery, B. J., Lyons, J. E., Niles, L. J. and Newstead, D. (2014) Red knot Calidris canutus roselaari migration connectivity, abundance and non-breeding distribution along the Pacific coast of the Americas. Wader Study Group Bull. 120: 168–180.Google Scholar
Delgado, C., Sepúlveda, M. and Álvarez, R. (2010) Plan de Conservación para las aves playeras migratorias de Chiloé. Resumen Ejecutivo. Valdivia.Google Scholar
Farmer, A., Holames, R. T. and Pitelka, F. A. (2020) Pectoral Sandpiper (Calidris melanotos), version 1.0. In Billerman, S. M., ed. Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Accessed online on 8 July 2020, doi: [10.2173/bow.pecsan.01].Google Scholar
Griffiths, R., Double, M. C., Orr, K. and Dawson, R. J. G. (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Biol. 7: 1071–1075.Google ScholarPubMed
Han, J. I., Kim, J. H., Kim, S., Park, S. R. and Na, K. J. (2009) A simple and improved DNA test for avian sex determination. Auk 126: 779–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedenström, A. (2010) Extreme endurance migration: What is the limit to non-stop flight? PLoS Biol. 8: e1000362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hua, N., Piersma, T. and Ma, Z. (2013) Three-phased fuel deposition in a long-distance migrant, the Red Knot (Calidris canutus piersmai), before the flight to High Arctic breeding grounds. PLoS ONE 8: e62551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inventario nacional de especies de Chile (2008) Reglamento de Clasificación de Especies. 2° Proceso de Clasificación de Especies (2006). Accessed online on 23 June 2020, https://clasificacionespecies.mma.gob.cl/procesos-de-clasificacion/2o-proceso-de-clasificacion-de-especies-2006/ Google Scholar
Johnson, J. A., Andres, B. A., Sitters, H. P., Valenzuela, J., Niles, L. J., Dey, A. D., Peck, M. K. and Espinosa, L. A. (2007) Counts and captures of Hudsonian Godwits and Whimbrels on Chiloé Island, Chile, January–February 2007. Wader Study Group Bull. 113: 47–52.Google Scholar
Lathrop, R. G., Niles, L., Smith, P., Peck, M., Dey, A., Sacatelli, R. and Bognar, J. (2018) Mapping and modeling the breeding habitat of the Western Atlantic Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa) at local and regional scales. Condor 120: 650–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. E., Winn, B., Keyes, T. and Kalasz, K. S. (2018) Post-Breeding Migratory and Connectivity of Red Knots in the Western Atlantic. J. Wildl. Manag. 82: 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Curci, N. S., Isacch, J. P., D’Amico, V. L., Rojas, P. and Castresana, G.J. (2020) To migrate or not: drivers of over-summering in a long-distance migratory shorebird. J. Avian Biol. 51 doi: [10.1111/jav.02401].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, C. P., Smith, D. R., Nichols, J. D., Lyons, J. E., Sweka, J., Kalasz, K., Niles, L. J., Wong, R., Brust, J., Davis, M. and Spear, B. (2015) Implementation of a framework for multi-species, multi-objective adaptive management in Delaware Bay. Biol. Conserv. 191: 759–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micael, J. and Navedo, J.G. (2018) Macrobenthic communities at high southern latitudes: Food supply for long-distance migratory shorebirds. Austral Ecol. 43: 955–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navedo, J. G. and Gutiérrez, J. S. (2019) Migratory connectivity and local site fidelity in red knots on the southern Pacific coast of South America. Aquat. Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 29: 670–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navedo, J. G. and Ruiz, J. (2020). Oversummering in the southern hemisphere by long-distance migratory shorebirds calls for reappraisal of wetland conservation policies. Global Ecol. Conserv. 23: e01189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navedo, J. G., Verdugo, C., Rodríguez-Jorquera, I. A., Abad-Gómez, J. M., Suazo, C. G., Castañeda, L. E., Araya, V., Ruiz, J. and Gutiérrez, J. S. (2019) Assessing the effects of human activities on the foraging opportunities of migratory shorebirds in Austral high-latitude bays. PLoS ONE 14: e0212441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navedo, J.G., Araya, V. and Verdugo, C. (2021) Upraising a silent pollution: Antibiotic resistance at coastal environments and transference to long-distance migratory shorebirds. Sci. Tot. Environ. 777: 146004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newstead, D. J., Niles, L. J., Porter, R. R., Dey, A. D., Burger, J. and Fitzsimmons, O. N. (2013) Geolocation reveals mid-continent migratory routes and Texas wintering areas of Red Knots Calidris canutus rufa . Wader Study Group Bull. 120: 53–59.Google Scholar
Niles, L. J., Dey, A. D., Douglass, N. J., Clark, J. A., Clark, N. A., Gates, A. S., Harrington, B. A., Peck, M. K. and Sitters, H. P. (2006) Red Knots wintering in Florida: 2005/6 expedition. Wader Study Group Bull. 111: 86–99.Google Scholar
Niles, L. J., Sitters, H. P., Dey, A. D., Atkinson, P. W., Baker, A. J., Bennett, K. A., Carmona, R., Clark, K. E., Clark, N. A., Espoz, C., González, P. M., Harrington, B. A., Hernández, D. E., Kalasz, K. S., Lathrop, R. G., Matus, R. N., Minton, C. D. T., Morrison, R. I. G., Peck, M. K., Pitts, W., Robinson, R. A. and Serrano, I. L. (2008) Status of the red knot, Calidris canutus rufa, in the Western Hemisphere. Stud. Avian Biol. 36: 1–185.Google Scholar
Parmelee, D. F. (2020) White-rumped Sandpiper (Calidris fuscicollis), version 1.0. In Poole, A. F. Stettenheim, P. R., and Gill, F. B., eds. Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Accessed online on 8 July 2020. doi: [10.2173/bow.whrsan.01].Google Scholar
Piersma, T., Rogers, D. I., González, P. M., Zwarts, L., Niles, L. J., de Lima Serrano Do Nascimiento, I., Minton, C. D. T. and Baker, A. J. (2004) Fuel storage rates before northward flights in Red Knots worldwide: Facing the severest ecological constraint in tropical intertidal conditions? In Greenberg, R. and Marra, P. P., eds). Birds of two worlds: The ecology and evolution of migratory birds. Baltimore, MD, US: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pyle, P. (2008) Identification guide to North American Birds, Part II. Port Reyes Station, CA, US: Slate Creek Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Redfern, C. P. F. and Clark, J. A. (2001) Ringers’ manual. Thetford, UK: British Trust for Ornithology.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, K. V., Dokter, A. M., Blancher, P. J., Sauer, J. R., Smith, A. C., Smith, P. A., Stanton, J. C., Panjabi, A., Helft, L., Parr, M. and Marra, P. P. (2019) Decline of the North American avifauna. Science 366: 120–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runge, C. A., Martin, T. G., Possingham, H. P., Willis, S. and Fuller, R. A. (2014) Conserving mobile species. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12: 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (2010) Normal Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental, especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestre – Categoría de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio – Lista de especies en riesgo. Mexico City: Diario Oficial de la República Mexicana.Google Scholar
Senner, N. R. (2012) One species but two patterns: Populations of the Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica) differ in spring migration timing. Auk 129: 670–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, R. W., Underhill, L. G., Waltner, M. and Swann, R. (2010) Differences in biometrics and moult of non-breeding Red Knots Calidris canutus in southern Africa and Scotland reflect contrasting climatic conditions. Ibis 152: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. H., Székely, T. and Sutherland, W. J. (2003) Publication bias in waders. Wader Study Group Bull. 100: 216–223.Google Scholar
Tomkovich, P. S. (1992) An analysis of the geographic variability in knots Calidris canutus based on museum skins. Wader Study Group Bull. 64 Suppl: 17–23.Google Scholar
Tomkovich, P. S. and Dondua, A. G. (2008) Red Knots on Wrangel Island: results of observations and catching in summer 2007. Wader Study Group Bull. 115: 102–109.Google Scholar
Tomkovich, P. S., Porter, R. R., Loktionov, E. Y. and Niles, L. J. (2013) Pathways and staging areas of Red Knots Calidris canutus rogersi breeding in southern Chukotka, Far Eastern Russia. Wader Study Group Bull. 120: 181–193.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. M., McGowan, C. P., Robinson, R. A., Clark, J. A., Lyons, J. E., DeRose-Wilson, A., du Feu, R., Austin, G. E., Atkinson, P. W. and Clark, N. A. (2019) Effects of individual misidentification on estimates of survival in long-term mark–resight studies. Condor 121: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2015) Red knot (Calidris canutus rufa). Accessed online on June 22nd 2020. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/profile/speciesProfile?sId=1864 Google Scholar
U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan Partnership (2016) Shorebirds of conservation concern in the United States of America – 2016. Accessed online on June 22nd 2020, http://www.shorebirdplan.org/science/assessment-conservation-status-shorebirds/ Google Scholar
WHSRN (2011) Eastern Wetlands of Chiloé – a WHSRN site of Hemispheric Importance. Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network. Accessed online on March 1st 2021. https://whsrn.org/es/chiloe-island/ Google Scholar
Wilcove, D. S. and Wikelski, M. (2008) Going, going, gone: Is animal migration disappearing? PLoS Biol. 6: e188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Morphometrics (in mm) of Red Knots captured in Chiloé Archipelago. We present the mean and standard deviation (SD), range of values, and sample size (n). Results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) are presented with F and P values.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Resightings of Red Knots banded in Chiloé Archipelago, Chile. Light dots represent resightings during northward migration, dark dots represent resightings during southward migration, and the star represents non-breeding area in Chiloé. Each number corresponds to: 1) Chiloé, Chile; 2) Yucatán, México; 3) Texas, USA; 4) Louisiana, USA; 5) Florida, USA; 6) Paracas, Perú; 7) Minnesota, USA; 8) Manitoba, Canada; 9) Escuintla, Guatemala; 10) Esmeraldas, Ecuador.

Figure 2

Table 2. Comparison of the bill length (mm) of red knots captured in different non-breeding areas.