Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:53:20.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Amorphous Silicon Thin Film Transistor Biosensing System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2013

Hanbin Ma
Affiliation:
Electrical Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, U.K.
Ben Miller
Affiliation:
Electrical Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, U.K.
Sungsik Lee
Affiliation:
London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, 17-19 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AH, U.K.
Arman Ahnood
Affiliation:
Electrical Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, U.K.
Marius Bauza
Affiliation:
London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, 17-19 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AH, U.K.
William I. Milne
Affiliation:
Electrical Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, U.K.
Arokia Nathan
Affiliation:
Electrical Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Electronic systems are a very good platform for sensing biological signals for fast point-of-care diagnostics or threat detection. One of the solutions is the lab-on-a-chip integrated circuit (IC), which is low cost and high reliability, offering the possibility for label-free detection. In recent years, similar integrated biosensors based on the conventional complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology have been reported. However, post-fabrication processes are essential for all classes of CMOS biochips, requiring biocompatible electrode deposition and circuit encapsulation.

In this work, we present an amorphous silicon (a-Si) thin film transistor (TFT) array based sensing approach, which greatly simplifies the fabrication procedures and even decreases the cost of the biosensor. The device contains several identical sensor pixels with amplifiers to boost the sensitivity. Ring oscillator and logic circuits are also integrated to achieve different measurement methodologies, including electro-analytical methods such as amperometric and cyclic voltammetric modes. The system also supports different operational modes. For example, depending on the required detection arrangement, a sample droplet could be placed on the sensing pads or the device could be immersed into the sample solution for real time in-situ measurement. The entire system is designed and fabricated using a low temperature TFT process that is compatible to plastic substrates. No additional processing is required prior to biological measurement. A Cr/Au double layer is used for the biological-electronic interface. The success of the TFT-based system used in this work will open new avenues for flexible label-free or low-cost disposable biosensors.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Froehling, P. E., “Dendrimers and dyes - a review,” vol. 48, pp. 187–195, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaji, G., Nathan, A., and Pankhurst, Q., “Merged phototransistor pixel with enhanced near infrared response and flicker noise reduction for biomolecular imaging,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 20, p. 203504, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, T. G., Hill, M. G., and Barton, J. K., “Electrochemical DNA sensors.,” Nature biotechnology, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1192–9, Oct. 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, P. M., Member, S., Gong, P., Levicky, R., and Shepard, K. L., “Active CMOS Sensor Array for Electrochemical Biomolecular Detection,” vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1859–1871, 2008.Google Scholar
Rothberg, J. M., Hinz, W., Rearick, T. M., Schultz, J., Mileski, W., Davey, M., Leamon, J. H., Johnson, K., Milgrew, M. J., Edwards, M., Hoon, J., Simons, J. F., Marran, D., Myers, J. W., Davidson, J. F., Branting, A., Nobile, J. R., Puc, B. P., Light, D., Clark, T. a, Huber, M., Branciforte, J. T., Stoner, I. B., Cawley, S. E., Lyons, M., Fu, Y., Homer, N., Sedova, M., Miao, X., Reed, B., Sabina, J., Feierstein, E., Schorn, M., Alanjary, M., Dimalanta, E., Dressman, D., Kasinskas, R., Sokolsky, T., Fidanza, J. a, Namsaraev, E., McKernan, K. J., Williams, A., Roth, G. T., and Bustillo, J., “An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing.,” Nature, vol. 475, no. 7356, pp. 348–52, Jul. 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schindler, M., Kim, S. K., Hwang, C. S., Schindler, C., Offenhäusser, a., and Ingebrandt, S., “Novel post-process for the passivation of a CMOS biosensor,” physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46, Jan. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, D., Prazeres, D. M. F., Chu, V., and Conde, J. P., “Detection of DNA and proteins using amorphous silicon ion-sensitive thin-film field effect transistors.,” Biosensors & bioelectronics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 545–51, Dec. 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solanki, P. R., Kaushik, A., Agrawal, V. V., and Malhotra, B. D., “Nanostructured metal oxide-based biosensors,” NPG Asia Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1724, Jan. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., “Carbon-Nanotube Based Electrochemical Biosensors: A Review,” Electroanalysis, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 714, Jan. 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.-R., Bong, S., Kang, Y.-J., Yang, Y., Mahajan, R. K., Kim, J. S., and Kim, H., “Electrochemical detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid using graphene modified electrodes.,” Biosensors & bioelectronics, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2366–9, Jun. 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed