Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:57:18.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SPEEK-based Composite Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Alessandra D'Epifanio
Affiliation:
alessandra.d.epifanio@uniroma2.it, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
Barbara Mecheri
Affiliation:
barbara.mecheri@uniroma2.it, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
Christoph F Weise
Affiliation:
cfweise@yahoo.com, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, New York, United States
Steve Greenbaum
Affiliation:
steve.greenbaum@hunter.cuny.edu, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, New York, United States
E Traversa
Affiliation:
NAST Center & Department of Chemical Science and Technology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Roma, Italy
Silvia Licoccia
Affiliation:
licoccia@uniroma2.it, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Sulfonated polyether ether ketone (SPEEK)-based composite membranes doped with 23 and 50 wt% of hydrated tin oxide (SnO2·nH2O) were prepared and characterized for Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) applications . The composite membranes were characterized in terms of ion exchange capacity (IEC), tensile tests, water uptake measurements, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and Pulsed-field-gradient spin-echo nuclear magnetic resonance (PFGSE NMR) spectroscopy. The body of results indicated the involvement of hydrated tin oxide in the proton conduction mechanism, the inorganic phase providing additional paths between the water clusters for proton transport. NMR measurements evidenced that SnO2·nH2O particles not only facilitate the proton transport but also hinder water diffusion. Therefore, due to the selectivity of SnO2·nH2O for proton diffusion, the filler effect was found to be also beneficial for the reduction of methanol crossover through the SPEEK membrane and for improving the performance of the SPEEK membrane when used as electrolyte in a DMFC test station.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cremers, C., Scholz, M., Seliger, W., Racz, A., Knechtel, W., Rittmayr, J., Grafwallner, F., Peller, H., Stimming, U., Fuel Cells 7, 21 (2007).Google Scholar
2. Mauritz, K.A., Moore, R.B., Chem. Rev. 104, 4535 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Jones, D.J., Rozière, J., Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 33, 503 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Alberti, G., Casciola, M., Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 33, 129 (2003).Google Scholar
5. England, W.A., Cross, M.G., Hammett, A., Wiseman, P.J. and Goodenough, J.B., Solid State Ionics 1, 231 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Giesekke, E.W., Gutowsky, H.S., Kirkov, P., Laitenen, H.A., Inorg. Chem. 6, 1294 (1967).Google Scholar
7. Mecheri, B., D'Epifanio, A., Traversa, E. and Licoccia, S., J. Power Sources 178, 554 (2008).Google Scholar
8. Ren, X., Springer, T. E., Zawodzinski, T. A., and Gottesfeld, S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 466 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Kreuer, K.D., Chem. Mater. 8, 610 (1996).Google Scholar