Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:22:09.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2000

KIRK R. DAFFNER
Affiliation:
Brigham Behavioral Neurology Group and Laboratory of Higher Cortical Functions, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
M. MARSEL MESULAM
Affiliation:
Center for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA
LEONARD F.M. SCINTO
Affiliation:
Brigham Behavioral Neurology Group and Laboratory of Higher Cortical Functions, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
VIVIAN CALVO
Affiliation:
Brigham Behavioral Neurology Group and Laboratory of Higher Cortical Functions, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
ROBERT FAUST
Affiliation:
Brigham Behavioral Neurology Group and Laboratory of Higher Cortical Functions, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
PHILLIP J. HOLCOMB
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA
Get access

Abstract

This study investigated the functional significance of the N2 response to novel stimuli. In one condition, background, target, and deviant stimuli were simple geometric figures. In a second condition, all stimulus types were unfamiliar/unusual figures. In a third condition, background and target stimuli were unusual figures and deviant stimuli were simple shapes. Unusual figures, whether they were deviant, target, or background stimuli, evoked larger N2 responses than their simple, familiar counterparts. N2 elicited by an unusual background stimulus was larger than that evoked by simple, deviant stimuli, a pattern opposite that exhibited by the subsequent P3. Deviance from immediate context had limited influence over N2 amplitude. The results suggest that novelty N2 and novelty P3 reflect the processing of different aspects of “novel” visual stimuli. The novelty P3 is particularly sensitive to deviation from immediate context. In contrast, the novelty N2 is sensitive to deviation from long-term context that renders a stimulus unfamiliar and difficult to encode.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2000 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)