Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:12:24.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substrate Issues for Advanced Display Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Dawne M. Moffatt-Fairbanks
Affiliation:
Corning Incorporated, Science and Technology - Advanced Display Products Development SP-PR-02–5, Corning, New York 14831
David L. Tennent
Affiliation:
Corning Incorporated, Science and Technology - Advanced Display Products Development SP-PR-02–5, Corning, New York 14831
Get access

Abstract

The glass substrate plays a crucial role in the successful performance of advanced flat panel displays (FPDs). These FPD technologies include active-matrix liquid crystal displays (AMLCD) and Plasma Displays (PDP). Although these displays are different in the way in which they operate, there are several common substrate requirements, all of which are determined by the process for making the entire display. These include issues relating to substrate size, thermal shrinkage, high temperature stability, and substrate surface quality.

While AMLCD technology is moving toward larger sizes, PDPs are currently large size displays, requiring large glass substrates. The primary issue in using larger substrates is minimizing distortion of the glass during high temperature processes, both viscous sag and shrinkage. These are related to the high temperature thermal stability which, in turn, is largely determined by the strain point and thermal history of the substrate. Finally, thickness uniformity and surface flaws are critical to the performance of the final display.

Coming's Code 1737 glass substrate meets the requirements for AMLCDs and has become the industry standard. Corning/Saint-Gobain Code CS25 glass is a new glass that has significant benefits over soda-lime glass for PDP applications. This paper will discuss these two glasses in terms of the above-mentioned issues.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Moffatt, Dawne M., Mater. Res. Bull. XXI (3) 31 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Gy, R., Koch, S., El Khiati, N., Courtemanche, G., Lapp, J., Barlier, P., and Ono, T., SID Proceedings (1996).Google Scholar
3. Pilkington, L. A. B., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 314, 1 (1969).Google Scholar
4. Tennent, D. L. and Luce, F.C., “Gravitational and Viscous Sag in Advanced Technology”, Asian Flat Panel Industry Conference, Portland, Oregon, June 20–21, 1996.Google Scholar
5. Moffatt, D. M., in Flat Panel Display Materials, edited by Batey, J., Chiang, A., and Holloway, P. H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 345, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994) p. 163.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, J.R., Bristow, R. H., Blau, H. H., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 34, 165172 (1951).Google Scholar
7. Lapp, J. C., Pegouret, J., and Eid, B. A., in Proc. 2nd Int. Display Workshops, Vol. 1 (IDW'95 Commitee, Hamamatsu, Japan, 1995) p. 37.Google Scholar
8. Lapp, J. C, Bocko, P. L., and Nelson, J. W.,”Advanced Glass Substrates for Flat Panel Displays” in SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 2174 (SPIE, Bellingham, Washington, 1994) p. 129.Google Scholar
9. Moffatt, D. M., in Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1995, edited by Hack, M., Schiff, E., Madan, A., Powell, M. and Matsuda, A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 377, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) p. 871.Google Scholar
10. Tool, A. Q., Journal of the Society of Glass Technology 9, 185207 (1925).Google Scholar
11. Buehl, W. M. and Ryszytiwskyj, W. P., SID Proceedings (1991) p. 667.Google Scholar