Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T16:08:50.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A retrospective analysis of community-onset bloodstream infections at a tertiary-care academic hospital in South Africa. Are current empiric antimicrobial practices appropriate?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2021

Vinitha Alex*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Microbiology Laboratory, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
Trusha Nana
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Microbiology Laboratory, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
Vindana Chibabhai
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Microbiology Laboratory, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
*
Author for correspondence: Vinitha Alex, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, 17 Jubilee Road, Parktown 2193, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa. E-mail: vinitha.alex@yahoo.co.za

Abstract

Background:

Community-onset bloodstream infection (CO-BSI) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Knowledge of locally prevalent pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns can promptly guide appropriate empiric therapy and improve outcomes.

Objectives:

We sought to determine the epidemiology of CO-BSI, the blood culture positivity rate and the contamination rate. We also sought to establish appropriateness of current empiric antimicrobial therapy practices.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed blood cultures taken from January 2015 to December 2019 at the emergency departments (EDs) of a tertiary-care academic hospital in South Africa using extracted laboratory data.

Results:

The overall positivity rate of blood cultures taken at the EDs was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.16) and the contamination rate was 7% (95% CI, 0.06–0.07). Gram-positive bacteria predominated in the pediatric cohort: neonates, 52 (54%) of 96; infants, 57 (52%) of 109; older children, 63 (61%) of 103. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant pathogen among older children: 30 (35%) of 85. Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen isolated among adults and the elderly: 225 (21%) of 1,060 and 62 (29%) of 214, respectively. Among neonates, the susceptibility of E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to the combination of ampicillin and gentamicin was 17 (68%) of 25. Among adults, the susceptibility of the 5 most common pathogens to amoxicillin-clavulanate was 426 (78%) of 546 and their susceptibility to ceftriaxone was 481 (85%) of 565 (P = .20). The prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales were low among all age groups.

Conclusions:

Review of blood culture collection techniques is warranted to reduce the contamination rate. High rates of resistance to currently prescribed empiric antimicrobial agents for CO-BSI warrants a re-evaluation of local guidelines.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Community-onset bloodstream infections (CO-BSIs) are associated with high mortality rates. Reference Bahwere, Levy and Hennart1,Reference Reddy, Shaw and Crump2 This situation has been exacerbated by increased antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to commonly prescribed “first-line” antimicrobials. The global increase in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL) Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (CRE-BSIs) is alarming. Reference Laupland and Church3Reference Naidoo, Nuttall, Whitelaw and Eley5 Although prompt administration of appropriate antimicrobial agents contributes to improved prognosis in bacteremic patients, the inappropriate use of antimicrobial therapy for BSI is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospitalization and negatively influences healthcare costs. Reference Blomberg, Manji and Urassa6,Reference Lee, Wang and Lee7 Early identification and rigorous management of sepsis within the first hour dramatically improves patient outcomes. Reference Ulldemolins, Vaquer and Llauradó-Serra8 Determining the epidemiology of CO-BSI can assist in developing effective empiric antimicrobial guidelines that will improve patient outcomes.

The prevalence of CO-BSI, causative pathogens, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns differ among different age groups, genders, and geographic regions. Reference Bahwere, Levy and Hennart1,Reference Laupland and Church3,Reference Moon, Ko, Park, Hur and Yun9 Although the prevalence of clinically significant CO-BSI in Africa has varied widely from 7% to >15%, Reference Bahwere, Levy and Hennart1,Reference Darboe, Okomo and Muhammad10 data for Southern Africa are scarce, particularly in the adult population. A systematic review found that >40% of African countries did not have AMR data. Reference Tadesse, Ashley and Ongarello11

AMR no longer exists purely as a healthcare-associated entity. Reference Blomberg, Manji and Urassa6,Reference Dramowski, Cotton, Rabie and Whitelaw12 It is widespread and increasing at a rate faster than the development of new antimicrobials. Reference Casadevall13 A 2017 estimation study attributed >700,000 deaths globally to AMR, and it is estimated that this will increase to 10 million deaths per year worldwide by 2050. Reference Tadesse, Ashley and Ongarello11,14

Increasing AMR with increasing age among adults has been described, suggesting the importance of patient age when choosing empiric antimicrobial therapy. Reference Lee, Wang and Lee7 The Standard Treatment Guidelines and Essential Medicines List for South Africa recommends empiric ceftriaxone for suspected sepsis in children with addition of cloxacillin in suspected staphylococcal infections. For neonatal sepsis, the empiric first-line therapy consistent with WHO guidelines is gentamicin combined with ampicillin or benzylpenicillin. Escalation to piperacillin-tazobactam in combination with amikacin is recommended if the child deteriorates on this regimen. 15 There are no guidelines in South Africa for CO-BSI in adults in the absence of a known source of sepsis. At Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), the empiric choice for CO-BSI at the emergency department (ED) is ampicillin plus gentamicin for neonates and either amoxicillin-clavulanate or ceftriaxone for children and adults, depending on the suspected source of infection. Amoxicillin-clavulanate is used empirically at surgical ED.

The objectives of this study were to determine the positivity and contamination rates of blood cultures taken at the CMJAH EDs and to determine the epidemiology of clinically significant pathogens based on patient age to determine the appropriateness of the current empiric antimicrobial therapy for CO-BSIs.

Methods

Study design

We conducted a retrospective laboratory-based study of blood cultures taken at the CMJAH EDs between January 2015 and December 2019. CMJAH is a 1,088-bed tertiary-care academic hospital in Johannesburg that offers numerous specialist services including neonatology, cardiology, pulmonology, infectious diseases, trauma, and oncology.

Definitions

CO-BSI was defined as a positive blood culture taken from a patient presenting to a CMJAH ED. Organisms isolated from a single blood culture per patient, categorized as contaminants by the US Centers for Disease Control, were regarded as contaminants. 16 Patients were stratified into 5 age categories: neonates (≤28 days), infants (29 days–1 year), older children (>1–12 years), adults (13–65 years), and elderly (>65 years). Due to the small sample size and wide spectrum of ages, all patients seen at the surgical ED were pooled for analysis.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens were classified according to standard definitions described by Magiorakos et al. Reference Magiorakos, Srinivasan and Carey17 These definitions were used exclusively for nonfermenter gram-negative bacteria.

Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens assessed were AmpC and ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, CREs, MDR, and XDR nonfermenter gram-negative bacteria, MRSA, and fluconazole-resistant Candida spp.

Laboratory analysis

The CMJAH microbiology laboratory is a 24-hour laboratory located on the hospital premises with on-site specialist clinical microbiologists. Blood cultures collected from the EDs were incubated in the automated BacT/Alert (bioMerieux, France) incubation system. Organism identification was performed using Vitek MS Matrix assisted laser desorption-ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) or Vitek 2 (bioMerieux, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, Vitek 2, or gradient diffusion and were interpreted using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI M100) standards. 1822

Data analysis

Blood cultures and accompanying microbiology sample data captured on the laboratory information system were analyzed. The data was accessed from the National Health Laboratory Services Corporate Data Warehouse. Positive cultures obtained from the same patient with the same organism within 4 weeks were considered a single episode of CO-BSI.

Microscopy, culture, and susceptibility results of samples including urine, cerebrospinal fluid, pus, fluid, tissue, sputum, tracheal aspirate, and stool taken at the ED were sought to identify the potential source or focus of infection.

Blood culture positivity and contamination rates, epidemiology of clinically significant pathogens causing CO-BSI based on age and prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Data were captured in Microsoft 365 Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, 2012). Data are presented as proportions and percentages for individual organisms and antimicrobials. The 2-sample test of proportions was used to calculate the P value. Stata/IC version 15.1 statistical software (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used for analysis. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval

Permission to conduct the study was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand (clearance certificate no. M200341).

Results

Among 29,286 blood cultures with documented ages collected at CMJAH EDs during the 5-year study period, 23,255 (79%) were collected from adults.

Positivity and contamination rates

The overall positivity rate of blood culture was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.16): pediatric ED (20%; 95% CI, 0.19–0.21), medical ED (14%; 95% CI, 0.13–0.14), and surgical ED (19%; 95% CI, 0.16–0.22).

The overall contamination rate was 7% (95% CI, 0.06–0.07), with the highest at the pediatric ED (14%; 95% CI, 0.13–0.15) followed by surgical ED (7%; 95% CI, 0.05–0.10) and medical ED (5%; 95% CI 0.04–0.05). Following the exclusion of negative cultures, contaminated cultures, cultures from patients with undocumented age and duplicate cultures, BSIs were identified in 1,274 (6%) of 23,255 patients at the medical ED, in 308 (6%) of 5,513 patients at pediatric ED, and in 45 (9%) of 518 patients at the surgical ED (Fig. 1). The most common contaminant in all EDs was coagulase-negative staphylococci. The distribution of other contaminants varied between different EDs. (Table 1).

Fig. 1. Study flow chart showing blood cultures analysed from the different emergency departments (EDs). Note. BC, blood culture; CMJAH, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital; BSI, bloodstream infection.

Table 1. Contaminants

Note. CI, confidence interval; ED, emergency department.

a Aerococcus viridans, Bacillus spp other than Bacillus anthracis, Kocuria spp, Lactococcus spp, Micrococcus spp, Microbacterium spp and Propionibacterium spp.

Age-based epidemiology

Among children, gram-positive bacteria predominated across all age groups. Among neonates, 52 (54%) of 96 isolates were gram-positive bacteria. Among infants, 57 (52%) of 109 isolates were gram-positive bacteria, and among older children, 63 (61%) of 103 isolates were gram-positive bacteria (Table 2).

Table 2. Rank Order of Pathogens Causing Community-Acquired Bloodstream Infection Among Children

Note. ED, emergency department.

a Acinetobacter spp, Bacteroides spp, Candida parapsilosis, Enterococcus durans, Enterococcus faecium, Haemophilus influenzae, Listeria monocytogenes, Proteus mirabilis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

b Acinetobacter spp, Bacteroides spp, Campylobacter jejuni, Candida albicans, Candida lusitaniae, Klebsiella spp, Neisseria meningitidis, Pantoea spp, Proteus spp, Pseudomonas oryzihabitans, Salmonella spp, Streptococcus anginosus, and Streptococcus pyogenes.

c Acinetobacter spp, Campylobacter coli, Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, Enterococcus cecorum, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella spp, Listeria monocytogenes, Moraxella spp, N. meningitidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella Typhi, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Streptococcus anginosus, and Streptococcus pyogenes.

A predominance of gram-negative bacteria was noted in adults [507 (48%) of 1,060] and the elderly [148 (69%) of 214]. E. coli was the most common pathogen identified in both these groups (Table 3). C. neoformans was almost exclusively seen among adults [93 (9%) of 1,060] compared to the elderly, among whom only 1 isolate was identified [1 (0.5%) of 214]. Nonfermenter gram-negative bacteria accounted for 32 (4%) of 907 among adults and 11 (5%) of 201 CO-BSIs among the elderly.

Table 3. Rank Order of Pathogens Causing Community-Acquired Bloodstream Infection Among Adults

Note. ED, emergency department.

a Acinetobacter spp, Actinomyces spp, Aeromonas hydrophila, Alcaligenes spp, Burkholderia cepacia, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida spp, Candida tropicalis, Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter koseri, Clostridium spp, Cryptococcus gattii, Enterobacter spp, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Enterococcus faecium, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Haemophilus spp, Listeria monocytogenes, Morganella spp, Neisseria meningitidis, Paenibacillus lactus, Parvimonas micra, Plesiomonas shigelloides, Prevotella bivia, Proteus spp, Prototheca, Providentia rettgeri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas oryzihabitans, Rothia spp, Salmonella Typhi, Serratia spp, Shigella sonnei, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus gallolyticus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Veillonella spp.

b Acinetobacter spp, Aeromonas hydrophila, Burkholderia cepacia, Candida albicans, Clostridium spp, Cryptococcus neoformans, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Haemophilus spp, Leuconostoc spp, Listeria monocytogenes, Moraxella spp, Morganella spp, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Serratia spp, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

c Candida glabrata, Clostridium perfringens, Cryptococcus neoformans, Enterobacter spp, Haemophilus influenzae, and Serratia spp.

Candida spp were uncommon across all age groups: 4 (1%) of 308 at the pediatric EDs, 14 (1%) of 1,274 at the adult and elderly EDs and 1 (2%) of 45 at the surgical ED.

Antimicrobial susceptibility to routinely prescribed antimicrobials

Among neonates, 30 (97%) of 31 gram-positive bacteria (excluding S. aureus) were susceptible to ampicillin. Of 16 S. aureus isolates, 15 (94%) were susceptible to methicillin. Also, 17 (68%) of 25 E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates (the 2 most common gram-negative bacteria identified among neonates) were susceptible to the combination of ampicillin with gentamicin. Of 25 E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, 24 (96%) were susceptible to ampicillin with amikacin (P < .05). Among 37 gram-negative isolates overall, 28 (76%) were susceptible to gentamicin. Among 35 gram-negative isolates, 34 (97%) were susceptible to amikacin (P < .05). Among the Enterobacterales, 27 (79%) of 34 were susceptible to cefotaxime.

Among infants, all gram-positive bacteria (excluding S. aureus) were susceptible to ampicillin. All S. aureus isolates were susceptible to cloxacillin. Among Enterobacterales, 21 (75%) of 28 isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate and 28 (85%) of 33 were susceptible to cefotaxime (P = .07).

Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) contributed to 17% of BSIs among neonates (15 of 89 isolates) and infants (17 of 99 isolates). Among older children, MSSA was isolated in 30 (35%) of 85 CO-BSIs. Among gram-negative bacteria, 4 (57%) of 7 isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate and 13 (87%) of 15 were susceptible to ceftriaxone (P < .05).

BSIs due to MSSA were identified in 137 (15%) of 903 adults and 22 (11%) of 201 elderly patients. Among adults, for the 5 most common pathogens, 426 (78%) of 546 isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate and 481 (85%) of 565 were susceptible to ceftriaxone (P = 0.2). Among the elderly, for gram-negative bacteria, 70 (65%) of 107 isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate and 88 (80%) of 110 were susceptible to ceftriaxone (P < .05). Among 130 gram-negative bacteria isolates, 108 (83%) were susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam.

At the surgical ED, among gram-negative bacteria, 10 (59%) of 17 isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanate and 12 (75%) of 16 were susceptible to ceftriaxone (P < .05). Among 22 gram-negative isolates, 16 (73%) were susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam in this group. All S. aureus identified in this unit were susceptible to cloxacillin.

Among 13 Candida spp isolated from all EDs, 12 (92%) were susceptible to fluconazole. The only resistant isolate was a Candida parapsilosis, which was isolated from a neonate. Detailed AST data are available in the Supplementary Material.

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant pathogens

MRSA was an uncommon cause of BSI across all age groups: 1 (1%) of 89 neonates, 3 (3%) of 87 older children, 11 (1%) of 903 adults, and 4 (2%) of 201 elderly patients (Table 4).

Table 4. Resistance Profile of Selected Pathogens

Note. ED, emergency department; VRE, vancomycin-resistant enterococci; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; MDR, multidrug resistant; XDR, extensively drug resistant.

AmpC-producing Enterobacterales accounted for BSIs among 8 (9%) of 89 neonates, 20 (5%) of 414 adults, 12 (6%) of 201 elderly patients, and 2 (4%) of 45 surgical patients.

ESBL-producing Enterobacterales were identified from all EDs: 6 (7%) of 89 neonates, 5 (5%) of 99 infants, 1 (1%) of 87 older children, 64 (7%) of 907 adults, and 19 (9%) of 201 elderly patients. The prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales in the surgical ED was 4 (9%) of 45.

CREs were identified in 1% of BSIs among neonates (1 of 89), older children (1 of 87), and adults (11 of 907). Among patients seen at the surgical ED, the prevalence was 1 (2%) of 45, and among the elderly the prevalence was 6 (3%) of 201.

XDR non-fermenter gram-negative bacteria were identified in 3 (0.3%) of 907 adults, 2 (0.9%) of 201 elderly patients, and 1 (2%) of 45 BSIs among surgical ED patients (Table 4).

Analysis of potential source/focus of sepsis

Among neonates, 66 (75%) of 88 blood cultures were accompanied by cultures from other sites. A potential focus or source of sepsis was identified in 27 (41%) of 66 BSIs. Meningitis was the most common focus of infection [14 (52%) of 27] followed by urinary tract infections [UTIs; 8 (30%) of 27]. Meningitis was also the most common focus of infection among infants [10 (26%) of 39] and older children [5 (17%) of 29].

At the surgical ED, among the blood cultures with concomitant cultures from other sites [17 (38%) of 45], the potential source of infection was identified in 10 (22%) of 45 BSIs. UTIs were the predominant source of infection in 4 (40%) of 10 cases. Among adults, 355 (39%) of 906 blood cultures were accompanied by cultures from other sites, and among the elderly, 80 (40%) of 201 blood cultures were accompanied by cultures from other sites. UTIs were the most common source of infection, with 57 (16%) of 355 cases among adults and 25 (31%) of 80 cases among the elderly.

Discussion

This is the first study describing the epidemiology of CO-BSIs at CMJAH EDs. The positivity rates in our study ranged between 14% and 20% and were higher than those described in other studies. Reference Lamy, Dargère, Arendrup, Parienti and Tattevin23 Contamination rates in our study (ie, 5%–14%) were higher than the internationally acceptable standard of 2%–3%. Reference Wilson24 Gram-positive bacteria were the predominant pathogens in our pediatric cohort. Gram-negative bacteria dominated among adults and the elderly. E. coli was the most prevalent gram-negative pathogen across all age groups. Despite S. aureus showing preponderance across all age groups, the prevalence of MRSA was low. Although the prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and CREs was low, high rates of resistance of gram-negative bacteria to currently prescribed empiric antibiotics were noted among neonates, adults, and the elderly.

Limiting collection of blood cultures to patients with a high likelihood of BSI and adherence to blood culture collection guidelines can assist in decreasing contamination rates. Reference Ntusi, Aubin, Oliver, Whitelaw and Mendelson25,Reference Doern, Carroll and Diekema26 The possible reason for the higher positivity rate in this study could be that the patients who present to this institution usually have a greater severity of illness and are often bacteremic. The high volume of patients and inadequate resources possibly results in suboptimal aseptic techniques, thus increasing the contamination rate.

In our study, the majority of pediatric BSIs occurred among infants. As reported in a South African study that reviewed community-acquired BSI in children aged 0–14 years, gram-positive bacteria predominated in our pediatric cohort, too. Reference Dramowski, Cotton, Rabie and Whitelaw12 More than half the isolates responsible for BSI among children of all age groups were gram-positive bacteria. Similar to other studies, S. aureus was a predominant pathogen across all age groups in our study. Reference Laupland, Lyytikäinen and Sgaard4,Reference Dramowski, Cotton, Rabie and Whitelaw12,Reference Friedman, Kaye and Stout27,Reference Young, Chen and Yen28 S. pneumoniae, reported as the most common pathogen associated with CO-BSI among African children, Reference Reddy, Shaw and Crump2 was prominent among infants and older children. South African surveillance data have shown that invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children aged <5 years is predominantly due to nonvaccine serotypes, whereas in older individuals it includes both vaccine and nonvaccine serotypes. 29 S. pneumoniae BSI was higher among adults than among the elderly, which could be related to the higher incidence of HIV among adults. 30 Children and adults at risk for IPD should be adequately vaccinated to protect against severe disease. Although S. agalactiae was predominantly seen among neonates, it was also identified among infants, adults, and the elderly. This finding contrasts with those of other studies in which it was identified exclusively in neonates and adults aged >60 years. Reference Moon, Ko, Park, Hur and Yun9

Enterobacterales were the commonest group of gram-negative pathogens with E. coli predominating across all age groups, consistent with the findings of several studies. Reference Dramowski, Cotton, Rabie and Whitelaw12,Reference Friedman, Kaye and Stout27,Reference Young, Chen and Yen28 The most prevalent isolate in CO-BSI among adults in Africa, nontyphoidal Salmonella, Reference Reddy, Shaw and Crump2 was uncommon in our study, similar to another study from South Africa. Reference Dramowski, Cotton, Rabie and Whitelaw12 This difference is likely due to the improved management of HIV in South Africa, a known risk factor for nontyphoidal Salmonella infections. The high prevalence of HIV (19%) among adults in South Africa, a well-established predisposing factor for invasive cryptococcal disease, could be the reason for the high rate of recovery of C. neoformans from BSI in this group. Reference Lin, Shiau and Fang31,32

Although gram-positive bacteria (excluding S. aureus) had good susceptibility rates to ampicillin among neonates, the susceptibility of the most common gram-negative bacteria to the current empiric therapy of ampicillin in combination with gentamicin was low (68%). For this reason and the high prevalence of MSSA (17%), cefotaxime monotherapy is recommended with the addition of amikacin to be considered in neonates with high risk for MDR pathogens. This risk includes prior exposure to healthcare or antibiotics, particularly in very low birth-weight and premature neonates.

The high prevalence of MSSA in older children supports the current South African empiric therapy guideline of ceftriaxone. Treatment should be changed to cloxacillin if culture confirms S. aureus BSI. When meningitis is not the reason for admission, amoxicillin- clavulanate is a suitable alternative.

In this study, gram-negative bacteria were the predominant cause of BSI among adults and elderly patients. Ceftriaxone is recommended for the empiric treatment of CO-BSI among adults. Consistent with previous reports, increasing AMR with increasing age was evident in our study. Reference Lee, Wang and Lee7 The elderly had higher proportions of AmpC, ESBL-, and CRE-producing Enterobacterales compared to adults and children. This finding could be related to increased comorbidities, exposure to health care, and antimicrobial use among the elderly. The addition of amikacin to ceftriaxone as a second agent is recommended in this population due to the high risk of MDR pathogens.

To provide a conclusive recommendation on empiric therapy for surgical patients, further studies focusing on this cohort with additional clinical information is required.

Although MRSA was isolated in several age groups, the prevalence was lower (0%–3%) than that described in other studies, in which it varied from 6% to 37%. Reference Naidoo, Nuttall, Whitelaw and Eley5,Reference Moon, Ko, Park, Hur and Yun9,Reference Young, Chen and Yen28 Empiric antibacterial cover for MRSA is not recommended in this population.

The prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales showed wide variation (1%–9%) between the different EDs, with the highest prevalence in our study surpassing levels of 7% to 8% described elsewhere. Reference Blomberg, Manji and Urassa6,Reference Moon, Ko, Park, Hur and Yun9

The potential source of infection was not identified for most BSIs. Although cultures from sites other than blood were collected in 75% of neonatal cases, <40% of BSIs had concomitant cultures from the other EDs. Meningitis was the most common focus among children, and UTI was the most frequently identified source among adult, elderly, and surgical patients. Identification of the focus of infection is important to guide empiric antimicrobial therapy because the prescribed drugs must achieve adequate tissue concentrations at the site of infection. Reference Strich, Heil and Masur33 Efforts should be made to submit samples from EDs for microbiological investigation from the most likely source of sepsis prior to the initiation of antibiotics. Due to the frequent presentation of nonspecific symptoms in neonates, identification of a source can be challenging. Cultures from cerebrospinal fluid and urine are advisable in the absence of an obvious source in this group. However, the collection of samples from other sites should not delay the initiation of antibiotics in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock. Reference Strich, Heil and Masur33

The findings of this study provide evidence for continued pathogen surveillance at hospital EDs, and they support the need for current guideline revision for empiric treatment of CO-BSI among adults and children.

This study had several limitations. It was conducted in a single tertiary-care center; the findings may not be universally applicable. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the current epidemiology and AMR might not be adequately reflected. Although all blood cultures analyzed were collected in the EDs, recent contact with other healthcare facilities and other risk factors for MDR pathogens could not be determined; thus, healthcare associated infections could have been inadvertently included. Adequacy of blood culture collection techniques, such as collection prior to initiation of antimicrobial therapy and volume of blood collected, both of which could lead to underestimation of BSI, could not be ascertained. Patients charts which could provide additional information regarding source of infection and predisposing factors for BSI (diabetes, immunosuppression, etc) were not reviewed. Lastly, the outcomes associated with empiric therapy were not available. The recommendations made above should thus be applied judiciously based on the clinical context.

Ongoing local and national surveillance of the epidemiology and AMR in CO-BSI is recommended to ensure that guidelines for empiric therapy remain appropriate. Follow-up studies are needed to determine whether implementation of these recommendations affects the clinical outcomes of patients with CO-BSI.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.236

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) for providing access to the data.

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Bahwere, P, Levy, J, Hennart, P, et al. Community-acquired bacteremia among hospitalized children in rural central Africa. Int J Infect Dis 2001;5:180188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, EA, Shaw, AV, Crump, JA. Community-acquired bloodstream infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;10:417432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laupland, KB, Church, DL. Population-based epidemiology and microbiology of community-onset bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014;27:647664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laupland, KB, Lyytikäinen, O, Sgaard, M, et al. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a multinational population-based surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:465471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naidoo, R, Nuttall, J, Whitelaw, A, Eley, B. Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia at a tertiary children’s hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e78396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, B, Manji, KP, Urassa, WK, et al. Antimicrobial resistance predicts death in Tanzanian children with bloodstream infections: a prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2007;7(1):43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C-C, Wang, J-L, Lee, C-H, et al. Age-related trends in adults with community-onset bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017;61(12):e01050-17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulldemolins, M, Vaquer, S, Llauradó-Serra, M, et al. Beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy. Crit Care 2014;18:227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon, H-W, Ko, YJ, Park, S, Hur, M, Yun, Y-M. Analysis of community- and hospital-acquired bacteraemia during a recent 5-year period. J Med Microbiol 2014;63:421426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darboe, S, Okomo, U, Muhammad, A-K, et al. Community-acquired invasive bacterial disease in urban Gambia, 2005–2015: a hospital-based surveillance. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69 suppl 2:S105S113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tadesse, BT, Ashley, EA, Ongarello, S, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Africa: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2017;17:616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dramowski, A, Cotton, MF, Rabie, H, Whitelaw, A. Trends in paediatric bloodstream infections at a South African referral hospital. BMC Pediatr 2015;15:33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casadevall, A. Crisis in infectious diseases: 2 decades later. Clin Infect Dis 2017;64:823828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AMR review paper—tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations_1.pdf https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/AMR%20Review%20Paper%20-%20Tackling%20a%20crisis%20for%20the%20health%20and%20wealth%20of%20nations_1.pdf. Accessed January 11, 2021.Google Scholar
Common skin contaminants/Common commensals in the NHSN as of June 2011. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/XLS/Common-Skin-Contaminant-List-June-2011.xlsx. Accessed November 24, 2021.Google Scholar
Magiorakos, A-P, Srinivasan, A, Carey, RB, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:268281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
M100-S25: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fifth Informational Supplement. :240.Google Scholar
CLSI M100 S26:2016. EM100 Connect website. http://em100.edaptivedocs.net/GetDoc.aspx?doc=CLSI%20M100%20S26:2016. Accessed January 21, 2020.Google Scholar
CLSI M100 S27:2017. EM100 Connect website. http://em100.edaptivedocs.net/GetDoc.aspx?doc=CLSI%20M100%20S27:2017. Accessed January 21, 2020.Google Scholar
CLSI M100 ED28:2018. EM100 Connect website. http://em100.edaptivedocs.net/GetDoc.aspx?doc=CLSI%20M100%20ED28:2018. Accessed January 21, 2020.Google Scholar
CLSI M100 ED29:2019. EM100 Connect website. http://em100.edaptivedocs.net/GetDoc.aspx?doc=CLSI%20M100%20ED29:2019&format=SPDF. Accessed January 21, 2020.Google Scholar
Lamy, B, Dargère, S, Arendrup, MC, Parienti, J-J, Tattevin, P. How to optimize the use of blood cultures for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections? A state-of-the art. Front Microbiol 2016;7:697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, ML, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Principles and Procedures for Blood Cultures: Approved Guideline. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007.Google Scholar
Ntusi, N, Aubin, L, Oliver, S, Whitelaw, A, Mendelson, M. Guideline for the optimal use of blood cultures. S Afr Med J 2010;100:839843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doern, GV, Carroll, KC, Diekema, DJ, et al. A comprehensive update on the problem of blood culture contamination and a discussion of methods for addressing the problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020;33(1):e00009e00019.Google Scholar
Friedman, ND, Kaye, KS, Stout, JE, et al. Healthcare-associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:791797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, T-G, Chen, Y-S, Yen, M-Y. Approach of empirical antibiotic treatment: analyzing bacterial resistance of community-acquired bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2010;43:4346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Group for Enteric, Respiratory, Meningeal Surveillance in South Africa. Annual surveillance report for laboratory-confirmed invasive meningococcal, haemophilus influenzae, pneumococcal, group a streptococcal and group b streptococcal infections, South Africa, 2019. https://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GERMS-SA-annual-surveillance-report-for-laboratory-confirmed-invasive-meningococcal-Haemophilus-influenzae-and-pneumococcal-disease-South-Africa-2017.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed December 5, 2021.Google Scholar
Statistics South Africa. Mid-year population estimates, 2019. South Africa: Statistics South Africa, Republic of South Africa; 2019. P03022019.Google Scholar
Lin, Y-Y, Shiau, S, Fang, C-T. Risk factors for invasive Cryptococcus neoformans diseases: a case-control study. PLoS One 2015;10(3):e0119090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HIV and AIDS in South Africa. Avert website. https://www.avert.org/professionals/hiv-around-world/sub-saharan-africa/south-africa. Published 2015, Accessed Sepember 16, 2021.Google Scholar
Strich, JR, Heil, EL, Masur, H. Considerations for empiric antimicrobial therapy in sepsis and septic shock in an era of antimicrobial resistance. J Infect Dis 2020;222 suppl 2):S119–S131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Study flow chart showing blood cultures analysed from the different emergency departments (EDs). Note. BC, blood culture; CMJAH, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital; BSI, bloodstream infection.

Figure 1

Table 1. Contaminants

Figure 2

Table 2. Rank Order of Pathogens Causing Community-Acquired Bloodstream Infection Among Children

Figure 3

Table 3. Rank Order of Pathogens Causing Community-Acquired Bloodstream Infection Among Adults

Figure 4

Table 4. Resistance Profile of Selected Pathogens

Supplementary material: PDF

Alex et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S15

Download Alex et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 156.3 KB