Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:37:24.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Categorization and Metaphorical Structuring: Some Remarks on Egyptian Art and Language1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Paul J. Frandsen
Paul J. Frandsen
Affiliation:
The Carsten Niebuhr Institute of Near Eastern StudiesUniversity of CopenhagenSnorresgade 17–19DK-2300 København S, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article discusses some aspects of the way the ancient Egyptians classified their world. The Egyptian method of representation aimed at showing things as they existed in the imagination of the artist who accordingly rendered them as they ‘really were’, and not as they were seen, that is, without having recourse to foreshortening, shadow, perspective. What is stored is a mental image of the prototype or ‘genus’ of the object. Linguistic and pictorial material provide evidence of the existence of inalienable properties of a given mental picture. Another set of components is the interactional properties. Both are grounded in the basic experience of the perceptual, motor and intellectual apparatus of the body. Their distribution is overlapping, because the factual inalienability of its own members is one of the first experiences of a child. While some aspects of the conceptual system and categorization grow out of this immediate experience, others can only be understood in terms of other types of experience, such as metaphors in the sense of Lakoff and Johnson. Hieroglyphs and art are discussed in terms of the notion of metaphorical structuring.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , April 1997 , pp. 71 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthes, R., 1930. Eine Polizeistreife des Mittleren Reiches in die westliche Oase. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 65, 108–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assmann, J., 1987. Hierotaxis. Textkonstitution und Bildkomposition in der altägyptischen Kunst, in Form und Mass. Beiträge zur Literatur, Sprache und Kunst des alten Ägypten. Festschrift für Gerhard Fecht zum 65. Geburtstag am 6. Februar 1987, eds. J., Osing & G., Dreyer. (Ägypten und Altes Testament 12.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 18–42.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 1990. Ma'at, Gerechtigkeit und Unsterblichkeit im Alten Ägypten. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 1995. Egyptian Solar Religion in the New Kingdom. Re, Amun and the Crisis of Polytheism. Translated from the German by Anthony Alcock. London & New York (NY): Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Baines, J., 1985a. Theories and universals of representation: Heinrich Schäfer and Egyptian art. Art History 8, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, J., 1985b. Fecundity Figures: Egyptian Personification and the Iconology of a Genre. Warminster: Aris & Phillips; Chicago (IL): Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.Google Scholar
Baines, J., 1994. On the status and purposes of ancient Egyptian art. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 4(1), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barb, A.A., 1971. Mystery, myth, and magic, in Harris (ed.), 138–69.Google Scholar
Bickel, S., 1988. Furcht und Schrecken in den Sargtexten. Studien zur altägyptischen Kultur 15, 17–25.Google Scholar
Bissing, F.W. von & H., Kees, 1923. Das Re-Heiligtum des Königs Ne-Woser-Re (Rathures), Band 2. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Blackman, A.M., 1915. The Rock-Tombs of Meir, part 2. (Archaeological Survey of Egypt 23.) London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Brunner, H., 1964 [1986]. Die Geburt des Gottkönigs. Studien zur Überlieferung eines altägyptischen Mythos. (Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 10.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. (A 2nd edition with additional material was published in 1986.)Google Scholar
Brunner, H., 1977. Herz. Lexikon der Ägyptologie II, 1158–68.Google Scholar
Brunner-Traut, E., 1980. Liebe. Lexikon der Ägyptologie III, 1034–47.Google Scholar
Buchberger, H., 1986. Vogel. Lexikon der Ägyptologie VI, 1046–51.Google Scholar
Cain, A.J., 1958. Logic and memory in Linnaeus's system of taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London 169, 144–63.Google Scholar
Černý, J., 1943. Philological and etymological notes, II.3: the sign + in the inscriptions on the Naos of El-'Arîsh. Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte 42, 341–5.Google Scholar
Černý, J. & S.I., Groll, 1984. A Late Egyptian Grammar.3 (Studia Pohl: Series Maior 4.) Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Google Scholar
Champollion, J.F. Le Jeune, 1844. Monuments de l'Égypte et de la Nubie. Notices descriptives conformes aux manuscrits autographes rédigés sur les lieux. 2 vols. Paris: Firmin Didot frères, Libraires-Éditeurs.Google Scholar
Currie, I.D., 1966. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis: a problem in the sociology of knowledge. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 11, 14–31. (Reprinted in Curtis, J.E. & Petras, J.W.) (eds.), 1970. The Sociology of Knowledge. New York (NY): Praeger, 403–21.Google Scholar
Dalgarno, G., 1661. Ars Signorum, vulgo Character universalis et Lingua philosophica. Qa poterunt, homines diversissimonrum Idiomatum, spatio duarum septimanarum, omnia Animi sua sensa (in Rebus Familiaribus) non minus intelligigiliter, sive scribendo, sive loquendo, mutuo communicare, qam Liinguis propriis Vernaculis. Præterea, hinc etiam poterunt Juvenes, Philosophia Principia, & veram Logicæ Praxin, citius & facilius multo imbibere, qam ex vulgaribus Philosophorum Scriptis. Londini: Excudebat J. Hayes sumptibus Authoris.Google Scholar
Davies, B.G., 1992. Egyptian Historical Records of the Later Eighteenth Dynasty, Fascicle IV. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Davies, N. de G., 1903–1908. The Rock Tombs of El Amarna. 6 vols. (Archaeological Survey of Egypt 13–18.) London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Davies, N. de G., 1943. The Tomb of Rekh-mi-Re at Thebes. 2 vols. (Egyptian Expedition 11.) New York (NY): Publications of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Davies, Nina de G. & A.H., Gardiner, 1915. The Tomb of Amenemhet (no. 82). (The Theban Tomb Series 1.) London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Davies, Nina de G. & A.H., Gardiner, 1926. The Tomb of Huy, Viceroy of Nubia in the Reign of Tut'ankhamun (no. 40). (The Theban Tomb Series 4.) London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Davis, W., 1989. The Canonical Tradition in Ancient Egyptian Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Depuydt, L., 1994. On the nature of the hieroglyphic script. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 121, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhorme, E., 1923. L'emploi métaphorique des parties du corps en hébreu et en akkadien. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Drioton, É., 1933. Une figuration cryptographique sur une stèle du Moyen Empire. Revue d'Égyptologie 1, 203–29.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. & M., Mauss, 1963. Primitive Classification. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
Eco, U., 1994. The Search for the Perfect Language. (The Making of Europe.) Oxford: Blackwell. (Original version: La ricerca della lingua perfetta nella cultura europea. Roma-Bari: Laterza 1993.)Google Scholar
Edel, E., 1955/1964. Altägyptische Grammatik. (Analecta Orientalia 34/39.) Roma: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
Edwards, I.E.S., 1960. Oracular Amuletic Decrees of the Late New Kingdom. 2 vols. (Hieratic Papyri in the British Museum, Fourth Series.) London: The Trustees of the British Museum.Google Scholar
Egerod, S., 1984. Østasiatiske sprog. Forelæsning den 1.marts 1984 i anledning af 25 års jubilæet som professor ved Kebenhavns Universitet. [East Asiatic Languages. Lecture held on March 1, 1984 on the Occasion of his 25th Anniversary as a Professor at the University of Copenhagen]. Copenhagen: Københavns Univer–sitets Østasiatiske Institut.Google Scholar
Erman, A., 1933. Neuaegyptische Grammatik.2Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Erman, A. & H., Grapow, 1928. Wörterbuch der ägyptischen Sprache, vol. II. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Essche-Merchez, E. van, 1992. La syntaxe formelle des reliefs et de la grande inscription de l'an 8 de Ramsès III à Médinet Habou. Chronique d'Égypte 67, 211–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essche-Merchez, E. van, 1994. Pour une lecture ‘stratigraphique’ des parois du temple de Ramsès III à Médinet Habou. Revue d'Égyptologie 45, 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnestad, R.B., 1978. The meaning and purpose of Opening the mouth in mortuary contexts. Numen 25, 118–34.Google Scholar
Finnestad, R.B., 1985. Image of the World and Symbol of the Creator. (Studies in Oriental Religions 10.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Fischer, H.G., 1963. Varia Aegyptiaca, 2: a realistic example of the hieroglyph for I3w ‘old’. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 2, 23–4.Google Scholar
Fischer, H.G., 1977. Hieroglyphen. Lexikon der Ägyptologie II, 1189–99.Google Scholar
Fischer, H.G., 1986. L'écriture et l'art de l'Égypte ancienne. Quatre lecons sur la paléographie et l'épigraphie phara–oniques. (Collège de France. Essais et conférences.) Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Frandsen, P.J., 1989. Trade and cult, in The Religion of the Ancient Egyptians. Cognitive Structures and Popular Expressions. Proceedings of Symposia in Uppsala and Bergen 1987 and 1988, ed. Englund, G.. (Boreas. Uppsala Studies in Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern Civilizations 20.) Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksell International, 95–108.Google Scholar
Frandsen, P. J., 1992. On the root nfr and a ‘clever’ remark on embalming, in The Heritage of Ancient Egypt. Studies in Honour of Erik Iversen, eds. J., Osing & E., Kolding Nielsen. (CNI Publications 13.) Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Frandsen, P.J., 1993. Perspektiv på det perspektivløse. Om ægyptisk og ægyptisk kunst. [A Perspective on that without perspective. On Egyptian and Egyptian art.] Tidsskriftet Antropologi 27, 75–118.Google Scholar
Frandsen, P.J., 1994. Prinsen og skæbnen og sprog–videnskaben [The Prince and the Destiny and Linguistics], in Era dybet. Festskrift til John Strange i anledning af 60 års fødselsdagen den 20 juli 1994 [From the Deep. Studies in Honour of John Strange on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday], eds. N.P., Lemche & M., Müller. (Forum for bibelsk eksegese 5.) København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag, 63–83.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A.H., 1931. The Library of A. Chester Beatty. Description of a Hieratic Papyrus with a Mythological Story, Love–Songs, and other Miscellaneous Texts. (The Chester Beatty Papyri I.) London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A.H., 1932. Late-Egyptian Stories. (Bibliotheca Aegyptiaca 1.) Bruxelles: Édition de la fondation égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Gilula, M., 1976. An unusual nominal pattern in Middle Egyptian. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 62, 160–75.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, O., 1992. The Narmer palette and the ‘triumph of metaphor’. Lingua Aegyptia 2, 67–85.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, O. & N., Laor, 1991. The allure of the holy glyphs: a psycho-linguistic perspective on the Egyptian script. Göttinger Miszellen 123, 37–51.Google Scholar
Grapow, H., 1924. Die bildlichen Ausdrücke des Ägyptischen. Vom Denken u. Dichten einer alt-orientalischen Sprache. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Grapow, H., 1954. Anatomie und Physiologie. (Grundriss der Medizin der alten Ägypter I.) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helck, W., 1957. Urkunden der 18.Dynastie. Historische Inschriften Amenophis' III. (Urkunden des ägyptischen Altertums IV, 20.) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Harris, J.R. (ed.), 1971. The Legacy of Egypt. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hornung, E., 1983. Fisch und Vogel: Zur altägyptischen Sicht des Menschen. Eranos Jahrbuch 52, 455–96.Google Scholar
Hubai, P., 1992. Eine literarische Quelle der ägyptischen Religionsphilosophie? Das Märchen vom Prinzen, der drei Gefahren zu überstehen hatte, in The Intellectual Heritage of Egypt. Studies Presented to László Kákosy by Friends and Colleagues on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, ed. Luft, U.. (Studia Aegyptiaca 14.) Budapest: La Chaire d'Égyptologie de l'Université Eötvös Loránd de Budapest, 277–300.Google Scholar
Iversen, E., 1975. Canon and Proportions in Egyptian Art.2Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Iversen, E., 1990. Metrology and canon. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts Kairo 46, 113–25.Google Scholar
Jánosi, P., 1994. Keminub — eine Gemahlin Amenemhets II.?, in Zwischen den beiden Ewigkeiten. Festschrift Gertrud Thausing, eds. M., Bietak, J., Holaubek, H., Mukarowsky & H., Satzinger. Wien: Im Eigenverlag des Institutes für Ägyptologie der Universität Wien, 94–101.Google Scholar
Jensen, J.V., 1992. The Fall of the King. Translated by Bower, A.G.. Edited and with an Afterword by Rossel, Sven H.. Seattle (WA): Mermaid Press.Google Scholar
Junge, F., 1983. Vom Sinn der ägyptischen Kunst, in 5000 Jahre Ägypten. Genese und Permanenz pharaonischer Kunst, eds. J., Assmann & G., Burkard. Nussloch: IS-Edition, 43–60.Google Scholar
Junge, F., 1990. Versuch zu einer Ästhetik der ägyptischen Kunst, in Studien zur ägyptischen Kunstgeschichte, eds. M., Eaton–Krauss & E., Graefe. (Hildesheimer Ägyptologische Beitrage 29.) Hildesheim: Gerstenberg Verlag, 1–25.Google Scholar
Kahl, J., 1994. Das System der ägyptischen Hieroglyphenschrift in der 0.–3. Dynastie. (Göttinger Orientforschungen. IV. Reihe, Ägypten 29.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Kákosy, L., 1986. Zeit. Lexikon der Ägyptologie VI, 1361–71.Google Scholar
Kammerzell, F., 1986. Zeichenverstümmelung. Lexikon der Ägyptologie VI, 1359–61.Google Scholar
Kaplony, P., 1966. Strukturprobleme der Hieroglyphenschrift. Chronique dÉgypte 41, 60–99.Google Scholar
Kay, P. & W., Kempton, 1984. What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist 86, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchen, K.A., 1979. Ramesside Inscriptions II. Oxford: B.H. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kitchen, K.A., 1989. Ramesside Inscriptions VII. Oxford: B.H. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lacau, P., 1914. Suppressions et modifications de signes dans les textes funéraires. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 51, 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacau, P., 1970. Les noms des parties du corps en égyptien et en sémitique. (Extrait des Mémoires de l'Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 44.) Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago (IL) & London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M., Johnson, 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago (IL) & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lanzone, R.V., 1881–1885. Dizionario di Mitologia Egizia. Torino: Litografia fratelli Doyen.Google Scholar
Leclant, J., 1969. Espace et temps, ordre et chaos dans l'Egypte pharaonique. Revue de synthèse, Série générate 90, 217–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, G., 1952. Tableau des parties du corps humain mentionnées par les égyptiens. (Supplément aux Annales du Service des Antiquités, Cahier N° 17.) Cairo: Imprimerie de l'lnstitut Français d'Archéo–logie Orientale.Google Scholar
Lepsius, R., 1904. Denkmäler aus Aegypten und Aethiopien. Text. (Zweiter Band, Mittelaegypten mit dem Faijum.) Edited by E., Naville, with collaboration from L. Borchardt. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Lepsius, R., n.d. [1972 or 1973]. Denkmaeler aus Aegypten und Aethiopien, nach den Zeichnungen der von Seiner Majestät dem Koenige von Preussen Friedrich Wilhelm IV nach diesen Landern gesendeten und in den Jahren 1842–1845 ausgeführten wissenschaftlichen Expedition, auf Befehl Seiner Majestaet herausgegeben und erläutert von C.R.Lepsius. Berlin: Nicolaische Buchhandlung n.d. 6 Abtheilungen. (Cited by Abtheilung, not by volume number. Reprinted in reduced format, A4, in the series Collection publiée sous l'égide du Centre de Documentation du Monde Oriental. Geneve: Éditions de Belles–Lettres.)Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1967. Linguistics and anthropology, in Structural Anthropology, by C. Lévi–Strauss. New York (NY): Doubleday Anchor Book, 66–79. (This article is a slightly revised version of a transcription of a tape recording of a lecture held at a conference for anthropologists and linguists in Bloomington, Indiana, and originally published in Supplement to [the] International Journal of American Linguistics 19(2) (1953). In this American edition there is a postscript, 80–96.)Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L., 1916. L'expression de la possession dans les langues mélanésiennes. Méemoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 19, 96–104.Google Scholar
Lyons, J., 1987. Semantics, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manniche, L., 1987. Sexual Life in Ancient Egypt. London & New York (NY): Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Meeks, D., 1986. Zoomorphie et image des dieux dans l'Égypte ancienne', in Le temps de la réflexion, VII: Corps des dieux, eds. C., Malamoud & J.-P., Vernant. Paris: Gallimard, 171–91.Google Scholar
Morenz, S., 1969. Der Schrecken Pharaohs, in Liber Amicorum. Studies in Honour of Professor Dr C.J. Bleeker. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 113–37. (Here quoted from Morenz, S., 1975. Religion und Geschichte des alten Ägypten. Gesammelte Aufsätze. Edited by E. Blumenthal & S. Herrmann with collaboration from A. Onasch. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 139–50.)Google Scholar
Müller, D., 1966. Die Zeugung durch das Herz in Religion und Medizin der Agypter. Orientalia 35, 247–74.Google Scholar
Murnane, W.J., 1995. Texts from the Amarna Period in Egypt. (Writings from the Ancient World Society of Biblical Literature 5.) Atlanta (GA): Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Myśliwiec, K., 1970. Remarques sur la conception d'espace de l'artiste egyptien. Études et Travaux 4, 61–72.Google Scholar
Myśliwiec, K., 1972. A propos des signes hieroglyphes ‘hr’ et ‘tp’. Zeitschrift filr ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 98, 85–99.Google Scholar
Naville, E., n.d. [1897]. The Temple of Deir el Bahari, part II. (Excavation Memoir 14.) London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Needham, R., 1963. Introduction, in Durkheim & Mauss, vii–xlviii.Google Scholar
Needham, R., 1979. Symbolic Classification. (The Goodyear Perspectives in Anthropology Series 1.) Santa Monica (CA): Goodyear Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Newberry, P.E., 1893. Beni Hassan, part II. (Archaeological Survey of Egypt 2.) London: The Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Osing, J., 1980. Libyen, Libyer. Lexikon der Ägyptologie III, 1015–33.Google Scholar
Otto, E., 1960. Das agyptische Mundöffnungsritual. 2 vols. (Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 3.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Piankoff, A., 1930. Le ‘Coeur’ dans les textes ègyptiens depuis l'Ancienjusqu à la fin du Nouvel Empire. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Piankoff, A., 1954. The Tomb of Ramesses VI. 2 vols. (Bollingen Series XL, 1–2.) New York (NY): Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Pirenne, M.H., 1963. Les lois de l'optique et la liberté de l'artiste. Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 60, 151–66.Google Scholar
Polotsky, H.J., 1964. Egyptian, in The World History of the Jewish People. Series 1, vol. 1: At the Dawn of Civilization, ed. Speiser, E.A.. Tel-Aviv: Massadah, 121–34 & 359–63. (Reprinted in Polotsky, H.J., 1971. Collected Papers. Jerusalem: At the Magnes Press, The Hebrew University, 320–38.)Google Scholar
Polotsky, H.J., 1968. The ‘weak’ plural article in Bohairic. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 54, 243–5.Google Scholar
Posener, G., 1976. L'enseignement loyaliste. Sagesse égyptienne du Moyen Empire. (Centre de Recherches d'Histoire et de Philologie de la IVe Section de l'Ecole pratique des Hautes Etudes, 11, 5.) Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Quack, J.F., 1994. Die Lehren des Ani. Ein neuägyptischer Weisheitstext in seinem kulturellen Umfeld. (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 141.) Freiburg Schweiz: Universitätsverlag; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Quaegebeur, J., 1975. Ledieu égyptien Shaïdans la religion et Vonomastique. (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 2.) Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Ray, J., 1986. The emergence of writing in Egypt. World Archaeology 17, 307–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, G., 1990. Problems in interpreting Egyptian art. Discussions in Egyptology 17, 45–58.Google Scholar
Roik, E., 1988. Das altägyptische Wohnhaus und seine Darstellung im Flachbild, Teil 1: Text and Teil 2: Abbildungen. (Europäische Hochschulschriften, Reihe XXXVIII Archäologie, Band 15.) Frankfurt am Main, Bern, New York & Paris: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rosén, H.B. 1959. Die Ausdrucksform für ‘veräusserlichen’ und ‘unveräusserlichen Besitz’ im Frühgriechischen. Lingua 8, 264–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, H., 1939. Wieder neue ungewöhnliche Darstellungen von Sonnenschiffen und das Viergespann des Brandenburger Tores. Mitteilungen des deutschen Instituts für ägyptische Altertumskunde in Kairo 8, 147–55.Google Scholar
Schäfer, H., 1974 (1986) [1963]. Principles of Egyptian Art. Edited, with an epilogue by Emma Brunner-Traut. Translated and edited, with an introduction, by John Baines. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (This is a translation of Von ägyptischer Kunst. Eine Grundlage. (4.verbesserte Auflage herausgegeben und mit einem Nachwort versehen von Emma Brunner-raut.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1963. The references to this edition are given in square brackets. — The English edition has been reprinted in 1986 by the Griffith Institute, Oxford, and provided with two pages of corrections and additions to the 1974 edition (pp. xix–xx).)Google Scholar
Scharff, A., 1942. Archäologische Beiträge zur Frage der Entstehung der Hieroglyphenschrift. (Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Abteilung Jahrgang 1942, Heft 3.) München: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schenkel, W., 1984. Schrift. Lexikon der Ägyptologie V, 713–35.Google Scholar
Schenkel, W., 1990. Einfüihrung in die altagyptische Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Seeber, C., 1976. Untersuchungen zur Darstellung des Totengerichts im Alten Ägypten. (Müinchner Ägyptologische Studien 35.) München & Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag.Google Scholar
Sethe, K., 1906. Urkunden der 18.Dynastie. Zweiter Band. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Sethe, K., 1908. Die altägyptischen Pyramidentexte nach den Papierabdrucken und Photographien des Berliner Museums. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Sethe, K., 1924. ° = m-hn.w ‘im Innern’ eine Rebusspielerei. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 59, 61–3.Google Scholar
Shisha-Halevy, A., 1986. Coptic Grammatical Categories: Structural Studies in the Syntax of Shenoutean Sahidic. (Analecta Orientalia 53.) Roma: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
Simpson, W.K., 1977. Amor dei: ntr mrr rmt m t3 w3 (Sh.Sai.147–8) and the Embrace, in Fragen an die altägyptische Literatur, eds. Assmann, J., Feucht, E. & R., Grieshammer. Wiesbaden: Dr Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 493–8.Google Scholar
Sørensen, J.P., 1984. The argument in ancient Egyptian magical formulae. Ada Orientalia 45, 5–19.Google Scholar
Sottas, H., 1923. Notes de grammaire égyptienne. Recueil de travaux relatifs à la philologie et à l'archéologie égyptiennes et assyriennes 40, 72–8.Google Scholar
Stern, L., 1880. Koptische Grammatik. Leipzig: T.O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Strange, J., 1980. Caphtor/Keftiu: a New Investigation. (Acta Theologica Danica 14.) Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stricker, B.H., 1963, 1968, 1975, 1982 & 1989. De Geboorte van Horus, vols. I–V. (Mededelingen en Verhandelingen van het Vooraziatisch-Egyptisch Genootschap ‘Ex Oriente Lux’ 14, 17, 18, 22, 26.) Leiden: Ex Oriente Lux.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Te Velde, H., 1985/1986. Egyptian hieroglyphs as signs, symbols and gods. Visible Religion 4/5, 63–71.Google Scholar
Tefnin, R., 1979. Image et histoire. Réflexions sur l'usage documentaire de l'image égyptienne. Chronique d'Étgypte 54, 218–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Till, W.C., 1955. Zum Sprachtabu im Ägyptischen, in Ägyptologische Studien, ed. Firchow, O.. (Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin Institut für Orientforschung, Veröffentlichung 29.) (= FsGrapow). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 322–37.Google Scholar
Till, W.C., 1961. Koptische Grammatik (Saïdischer Dialekt).2Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Vernus, P., 1981. Jeux d'écriture dans la civilisation pharaonique. Littoral. Revue de psychanalyse, 2, La main du rêve, 21–32.Google Scholar
Vernus, P., 1982. Espace et idéologie dans l'écriture égyptienne, in Écritures. Systèmes idéographiques et pratiques expressives. Actes du colloque international de l'Université Paris VII, 22, 23 et 24 avril 1980, ed. Cristin, A.-M.. Paris: Éditions Le Sycomore, 101–14.Google Scholar
Vernus, P., 1985. Des relations entre textes et représentations dans l'Égypte pharaonique, in Éctutures II, ed. Cristin, A.-M.. Paris: Editions Le Sycomore, 45–66.Google Scholar
Vernus, P., 1995. La naissance de l'écriture dans l'Égypte ancienne. Archeo-Nil. Bulletin de la société pour l'étude des cultures prépharaoniques de la vallée du Nil 3, 75–108.Google Scholar
Westendorf, W., 1965–1977. Koptisches Handwörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J., 1668. An Essay Towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: Printed for Sa: Gellibrand, and for John Martin.Google Scholar