Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:37:21.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Aspects of Securitization of Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Samuel H. Cox ,
Joseph R. Fairchild  and
Hal W. Pedersen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper explains securitization of insurance risk by describing its essential components and its economic rationale. We use examples and describe recent securitization transactions. We explore the key ideas without abstract mathematics. Insurance-based securitizations improve opportunities for all investors. Relative to traditional reinsurance, securitizations provide larger amounts of coverage and more innovative contract terms.

Keywords

Securitizationcatastrophe risk bondsreinsuranceretentionincomplete markets
Type
Workshop
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , May 2000 , pp. 157 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2000

References

1.Adams, C. and Authers, J. (1998) Fresh sale of catastrophe securities. Financial Times 1.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous (1997). CSFB, Winterthur storm Swiss CB sector with first catastrophe linked bonds. Euroweek, no. January 17, 5.Google Scholar
3.Bodie, Z., Kane, A. and Marcus, A.J., (eds.) (1996) Investments, third ed., Richard D. Irwin, Chicago.Google Scholar
4.Boyle, P.P., Cox, S.H., Dufresne, D., Gerber, H.U., Mueller, H.H., Panjer, H.H., (Editor), Pedersen, H.W., Pliska, S.R., Sherris, M., Shiu, E.S. and Tan, K.S. (1998) Financial economics with applications to investments, insurance and pensions. The Actuarial Foundation, Schaumburg, II 60173–2226.Google Scholar
5.Cantor, M.S., Cole, J.B. and Sandor, R.L. (1997) A new asset class for the capital markets and a new hedging tool for the insurance industry. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 10, no. 3, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Connolly, J. (1997) Insurers eye American Skandia's VA securitization. National Underwriter January 13, p. 1.Google Scholar
7.Coppack, L. (1998) Capital markets set to take on bidder role. Financial Times 1.Google Scholar
8.Cox, S.H. and Schwebach, R. (1992) Insurance futures and hedging insurance price risk. Journal of Risk and Insurance LIX 4, 628–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Cox, S.H., Fairchild, J.R. and Pedersen, H.W. (1998) Financial economics of securitization and alternative risk transfers, Working paper, Georgia State University, Center for Risk Management and Insurance Research submitted to Insurance: Mathematics and Insurance.Google Scholar
10.D'arcy, S.P. and France, V.G. (1992) Catastrophe futures: A better hedge for insurers. Journal of Risk and Insurance LIX 4, 565–601.Google Scholar
11.D'arcy, S.P. and France, V.G. (1993) Catastrophe insurance futures. Journal of the Society of CPCU, 202–213.Google Scholar
12.Embrechts, P. and Meister, S. (1995) Pricing insurance derivatives, the case of cat futures. Securitization of Insurance Risk (Schaumburg, Illinois) Society of Actuaries Monograph Series, May 1995, Bowles Symposium, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
13.Froot, K.A., Murphy, B.S., Stern, A.B. and Usher, S. (1995) The emerging asset class: insurance risk. Securitization of Insurance Risk (Schaumburg, Illinois) Society of Actuaries Monograph Series, May 1995, Bowles Symposium, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
14.Lane, M. (1995) The perfume of the premium … or pricing insurance derivatives. Securitization of Insurance Risk (Schaumburg, Illinois), Society of Actuaries Monograph Series, May 1995, Bowles Symposium, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
15.Luenberger, D.G. (1998) Investment science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
16.Markowitz, H. (1959) Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
17.Mayers, D. and Smith, C.W. Jr. (1982) On the corporate demand for insurance. Journal of Business 55, no. 2, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Monroe, A. (1997) Natural disaster bonds don't pay off – yet. Investment Dealers Digest 63, no. 11, 28.Google Scholar
19.Niedzielski, J. (1997) Securitization continues to evolve. National Underwriter 101. no. 28. 19, 28.Google Scholar
20.Niedzielski, J. (1997) Swiss Re in cat bond mkt for Calif. National Underwriter 101. no. 11, 6.Google Scholar
21.Schmock, U. (1999) Estimating the value of the wincat coupons of the winterthur insurance convertible bond. Astin Bulletin 29, no. 1, 101–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Scism, L. (1997) Investors in USAA “disaster bonds” could get the idnd knocked out of them if storm strikes. The Wall Street Journal, June 18, p. C21.Google Scholar
23.Shimpi, P. (1997) The context for trading insurance risk. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 22, no. 82, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Skipper, H. (1998) International risk management, Irwin, New York.Google Scholar
25.Tilley, J.A. (1995) The latest in financial engineering: Structuring catastrophe reinsurance as a high-yield bond. Tech. report, Morgan Stanley, New York, October 1995.Google Scholar
26.Tilley, J.A. (1997) The securitization of catastrophic property risks. ASTIN Proceedings, vol. XXVIII, ASTIN-AFIR Joint Day Proceeding, 13 August 1997. Cairns, Australia, pp. 499–549.Google Scholar
27.Zolkos, R. (1997) Hurricane bond issue takes market by storm. Business Insurance, June 17, 1997, p. 1.Google Scholar
28.Zolkos, R. (1997) Swiss Re issues cat bond. Business Insurance, July 28, 1997, pp. 2, 21.Google Scholar
29.Zolkos, R. (1998) Aon storms markets with typhoon cat bond. Business Insurance, June 29, pp. 3, 7.Google Scholar