Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:56:34.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Cost and Benefits of Biofuels: A Review of Recent Peer-Reviewed Research and a Sociological Look Ahead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Michael S. Carolan
Michael S. Carolan*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
*
Address correspondence to: Michael S. Carolan, Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, B236 Clark, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1784; (fax)970-491-2191; (email)mcarolan@colostate.edu
Get access

Abstract

This article reviews scientific, peer-reviewed literature on the costs and benefits of biofuels. Four peer-reviewed journals—Science, Natural Resources Research, Renewable Energy, and Journal of Cleaner Production—were searched for articles from the years 2006 through 2008 that evaluated some aspect of this fuel. The articles identified through this search were then assessed collectively. Non-foodstock biofuels were reported as having the fewest costs associated with their production and use. The article concludes on a sociological note, with a speculative look ahead. Drawing upon the concept of path dependency, the discussion turns briefly to society's ability (or perhaps lack thereof) to switch over to these so-called second-generation biofuels.

Environmental Practice 11:17–24 (2009)

Type
FEATURES
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 17 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beer, T., and Grant, T.. 2007. Life Cycle Analysis of Emission from Fuel Ethanol and Blends in Australian Heavy and Light Vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production 15:833–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belasco, W. 2006. Meals to Come: A History of the Future of Food. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Biospectrum. 2008. India, China Move Up in E&Y Biofuels Investment Sweepstakes. In Biospectrum: Asia Edition, March 28. Also available at http://www.biospectrumasia.com/content/280308IND5877.asp. Last accessed April 1.Google Scholar
Blottnitz, H., and Curran, M.. 2007. A Review of Assessments Conducted on Bio-Ethanol as a Transportation Fuel from a Net Energy, Greenhouse Gas, and Environmental Life Cycle Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 15:607–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddiger, D. 2007. Boosting Biofuel Crops Could Threaten Food Security. The Lancet 370(9591):923–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carolan, M. 2006. Scientific Knowledge and Environmental Policy: Why Science Needs Values. Environmental Sciences 3(4):229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolan, M. 2008. The Bright- and Blind-Spots of Science: Why Objective Knowledge is Not Enough to Resolve Environmental Controversies. Critical Sociology 34(5):725–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., and Hawthorne, P.. 2008. Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt. Science 319:1235–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangadharan, A., and Larcadas, A.. 2007. US Lifting of Tariff on Brazil Ethanol Might Spell Trouble for Amazon and Sugarcane Cutters. Brazzil Magazine August 27. Available at http://www.brazzil.com/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=9960. Last accessed March 24, 2008.Google Scholar
Geels, F. 2005. The Dynamics of Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Transition Pathway from Horse-Drawn Carriages to Automobiles (1860–30). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17(4):445–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grain. 2007. Corporate Power: Agrofuels and the Expansion of Agribusiness. GRAIN, July. Available at http://www.grain.org/seedling/?id=478. Last accessed March 22, 2008.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 2004. Policy Dependency and Reform: Economic Gains versus Political Pains. Agricultural Economics 31:265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinga, W., Junginger, H., Dekker, S., Hoogwijk, M., McAloon, A., and Hicks, K.. In press. Understanding the Reductions in US Corn Ethanol Production Costs: An Experience Curve Approach. Energy Policy (in press).Google Scholar
Kay, A. 2003. Path Dependency and the CAP. Journal of European Public Policy 10(3):405–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, M., Tonon, J., and Miller, G.. 2008. Earmarked: The Political Economy of Agricultural Research Appropriations. Review of Agricultural Economics 30(2):194–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, R., Wang, C., Zhang, C., Dai, D., and Pu, G.. 2008. Life Cycle Inventory and Energy Analysis of Cassava-Based Fuel Ethanol in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 16:374–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29:507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mielenz, J. 2001. Ethanol Production from Biomass: Technology and Commercialization Status. Current Opinion in Microbiology 4(3):324–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mousdale, D. 2008. Biofuels: Biotechnology, Chemistry, and Sustainable Development. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for Policy Analysis. 2002. Ethanol Subsidies. Idea House, National Center for Policy Analysis. Available at http://www.ncpa.org/pd/ag/ag6.html. Last accessed March 30, 2008.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., and Gheewala, S.. 2008. Fossil Energy, Environmental and Cost Performance of Ethanol in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production 16:1814–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzek, T. 2007. A First-Law Thermodynamic Analysis of the Corn-Ethanol Cycle. Natural Resources Research 15(4):255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D. 2003. Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Environmental Impacts Are Negative. Natural Resources Research 12(2):127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D., and Patzek, T.. 2007. Ethanol Production: Energy and Economic Issues Related to US and Brazilian Sugarcane. Natural Resources Research 16(3):235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D., and Pimentel, M.. 1996. Food, Energy, and Society. Colorado University Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Raynes, E. 2007. The Larger Story: Sugar Cane Workers and Ethanol. Center for Documentary Studies, Duke University, Durham, NC. Available at http://cds.aas.duke.edu/hine/raynes.html. Last accessed March 11, 2008.Google Scholar
Reijnders, L., and Huijbregts, M.. 2008. Palm Oil and the Emission of Carbon-Based Greenhouse Gases. Journal of Cleaner Energy 16:377–832.Google Scholar
Runge, C., and Senauer, B.. 2007. How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor. Foreign Affairs 86(3). Also available at http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070501faessay86305/c-ford-runge-benjamin-senauer/how-biofuels-could-starve-the-poor.html. Last accessed December 12, 2007.Google Scholar
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., and Yu, T.. 2008. Use of US Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases through Emissions from Land-Use Change. Science 319:1238–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M., and Caminda, C.. 2007. Ethanol's Deadly Brew. Bloomberg.com, October 4. Available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/marketsmag/mm_1107_story3.html#. Last accessed March 24, 2008.Google Scholar
Stefano, F., and Andrade, L.. 2006. George Soros Ataca No Campo. Dinheiro Rural, October (24). Available at http://www.terra.com.br/revistadinheirorural/capa24.htm. Last accessed March 24, 2008.Google Scholar
Tauli-Corpuz, V., and Tamang, P.. 2007. Oil Palm and Other Commercial Tree Plantations, Monocropping and the Impacts on Indigenous Peoples' Land Tenure and Resource Management Systems and Livelihoods. Special Rapporteur, United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, May. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/6session_crp6.doc. Last accessed March 24, 2008.Google Scholar
Tilman, D., Hill, J., and Lehman, C.. 2006. Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass. Science 314:1598–1600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Topgul, T., Yucesu, H., Cinar, C., and Koca, A.. 2006. The Effects of Ethanol-Unleaded Gasoline Blends and Ignition Timing on Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions. Renewable Energy 31:2534–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, G. 2000. Understanding Carbon Lock In. Energy Policy 28:817–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Agriculture. 2006. China, Peoples Republic of Bio-Fuels: An Alternative Future for Agriculture 2006. US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, GAIN (Global Agriculture Information Network) Report, August 8. Available at http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200608/146208611.pdf. Last accessed April 1, 2008.Google Scholar
Wilmar International. 2006. News Release: Wilmar Set to Be Asia's Leading Agribusiness Group through US$4.3 Billion Planned Merger and Restructuring. Wilmar International Limited, News Release, December. Available at http://www.wilmar-international.com/news/press_releases/WilmarPressRelease14.12.06.pdf. Last accessed March 24, 2008.Google Scholar
Zacharias, A. 2005. Shuck the Sheiks. Universe, New York.Google Scholar