Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T08:12:20.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benefit of textured CIGS cells for low reflecting nanogrid application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2017

Joop van Deelen*
Affiliation:
Solliance/TNO, High Tech Campus, 21, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
A. Omar
Affiliation:
Solliance/TNO, High Tech Campus, 21, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M. Xu
Affiliation:
TNO, Stieltjesweg 1, Delft, The Netherlands.
M. Barink
Affiliation:
Holst Centre/TNO, High Tech Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

We show the results of nanotextured device designs combined with carefully placed nanogrids in order to minimize optical losses. Finite element method (FEM) based optical modeling indicates that the reflection of both the layer stack and the metal is diminished by the proposed configuration in which the metallic nanowires at the front of a device are placed into the relatively shallow crevices, whereby the metal is not covered by other materials of the cell stack. The electric field distribution and energy dissipation (i.e. absorption) diagrams of the texture show how the light is distributed and where it is absorbed. It shows that light is ‘concentrated’ in the tips of the texture (depending on the size and wavelength of the light). Simultaneously, for wavelengths above 750 nm there appears to be a reduction of the E-field in the lower part of the texture and, therefore, putting a metallic nanowire in this position has hardly any negative optical effect.

Furthermore, the impact of the texture height up to 1000 nm and the nanowire width up to 150nm was systematically investigated for a texture and wire period of 500 nm. The spectra reveal dimension dependent and wavelength specific optical features. This is the case even if the flat nanowire remains fully exposed to the front glass medium (i.e. not embedded underneath absorbers). At a texture height of 900 nm, the reflection related current loss is reduced by an order of magnitude compared to flat layer stacks, virtually regardless of the width of the metal nanowire. This opens up exciting new ways of creating nano-metal containing devices without the usual optical losses.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ward, J.S., Duda, A., Friedman, D.J., Geisz, J., McMahon, W., Young, M.., Progr. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 23, 646 (2015).Google Scholar
van Deelen, J., Klerk, L.A., Barink, M., Rendering, H., Voorthuizen, P., Hovestad, A., Thin Solid Films 555, 159 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, P.C., Wang, S., Wu, H., Narasimhan, V.K., Kong, D., Lee, H.R., Cui, Y., Nat. Comm. 4, 2522 (2013).Google Scholar
van Deelen, J., Frijters, C., Solar Energy 143, 93 (2017).Google Scholar
Kik, P.G., Optics Lett. 39, 5114 (2014).Google Scholar
van Deelen, J., Klerk, L., Barink, M., Solar Energy 107, 135 (2014).Google Scholar
Van de Groep, J., Gupta, D., Verschuuren, M.A., Wienk, M.M., Janssen, R.A.J., Polman, A., Sci. Reports 51, 1414 (2015).Google Scholar
Afshinmanesh, F., Curto, A.G., Milaninia, K.M., Van Hulst, N.F., Brongersma, M.L., Nano Lett. 14, 5068 (2014).Google Scholar
Van de Groep, J., Spinelli, P., Polman, A., Nano Lett. 123, 138 (2012).Google Scholar
Kang, M.G., Guo, L.J., Adv. Mater. 19, 1391 (2007).Google Scholar
Landy, N., Smith, D.R., Nature Mater. 12, 25 (2013).Google Scholar
Schumann, M.F., Wiesendanger, S., Goldschmidt, J.C., Bläsi, B., Bittkau, K., Paetzhold, U.W., Sprafke, A., Wehrspohn, R.B., Rockstuhl, C., Wegener, M., Optica 2, 850 (2015).Google Scholar
Chen, F.H., Pathreeker, S., Kaur, J., Hosein, A.D., Opt. Express 24, A1419 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, V.K., Hymel, T.M., Lai, R.A., Cui, Y., ACS Nano 9, 1590 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Deelen, J., Omar, A., Barink, M., Materials 10, 392 (2017).Google Scholar
Xu, M., Wachters, A.J.H., van Deelen, J., Mourad, M.C.D., Buskens, P.J.P., Opt. Express 22, A425 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar