Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:17:13.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasmonics: Electromagnetic Energy Transfer and Switching in Nanoparticle Chain-Arrays Below the Diffraction Limit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Mark L. Brongersma
Affiliation:
Thomas J. Watson Laboratory of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
John W. Hartman
Affiliation:
Thomas J. Watson Laboratory of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
Harry H. Atwater
Affiliation:
Thomas J. Watson Laboratory of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125
Get access

Abstract

A model is given for the transport of electromagnetic energy through structures that consist of chains of closely spaced metal nanoparticles. This transport relies on the near-field electrodynamic interaction between metal particles that sets up coupled plasmon modes. The model predicts that the propagation is coherent and the group velocities can exceed typical saturation velocities of electrons in semiconductors (≈ 105 m/s). Furthermore, it is shown that in these structures propagation of energy around sharp corners (bending radius << the wavelength of visible light) is possible at high efficiency. This efficiency is a strong function of the frequency and polarization direction of the plasmon mode. The operation of a plasmon switch is modeled, in which plasmon waves can be switched or modulated. Finally, suggestions are given for the choice of metal particle and host material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Saleh, B.E.A. and Teich, M.C., The Fundamentals of Photonics, (John Wiley & Sons, inc., New York, 1991), p. 238.Google Scholar
2. Takahara, J., Yamagishi, S., Taki, H., Marimoto, A., and Kobayashi, T., Opt. Lett. 22, 475 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Quintin, M., Leitner, A., Krenn, J.R., and Aussenegg, F.R., Opt. Lett. 23, 1331 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Kreibig, U. and Vollmer, M., Optical Properties of Metal Clusters, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994), p.23.Google Scholar
5. Krenn, J.R., Dereux, A., Weber, J.C., Bourillot, E., Lacroute, Y., Goudonnet, J.P., Schider, G., Gotschy, W., Leitner, A., Aussenegg, F.R., and Girard, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2590 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Förster, Th., Ann. Physik 2, 55 (1948).Google Scholar
7. Dexter, D.L., J. Chem. Phys. 21, 836 (1953)Google Scholar
8. Meer, B. W. van der, Coker, G. III, Chen, S.-Y. S., Resonance energy transfer, (VCH Publishers, 1994), p. 35.Google Scholar
9. The rate of energy tranfer between a donor and an acceptor dipole scales with the square of Ei,m and thus as 1/d6. For this reason, taking into account next-nearest neighbor interactions will not significantly alter these results.Google Scholar
10. Greiner, Walter, Classical Electrodynamics, (Springer-Verlag, New York 1996), p. 429.Google Scholar
11. Kittel, C., Introduction to solid state physics, (John Wiley and Sons, New York 1986), p. 134.Google Scholar
12. Sze, S.M., Physics of semiconductor devices, (John Wiley and Sons, New York 1981), p. 44 Google Scholar
13. Nolte, D.D., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3740 (1994).Google Scholar