Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T14:04:22.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interface Morphological Stability of Unidirectionally Solidified RE123 Superconductor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. Sumida
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Graduate School of Engineering, the University of Tokyo, 7–3–1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113 Japan Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Y. Shiohara
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, 1–10–13, Shinonome, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135 Japan
T. Umeda
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Graduate School of Engineering, the University of Tokyo, 7–3–1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113 Japan
Get access

Abstract

A simple model is proposed to analyze the interface stability of the RE123 superconductor in accordance with the constitutional supercooling criterion. As the single crystal growth of the 123 phase is largely dependent on the growth interface stability, a quantitative analysis has been required. From the numerical analysis for the case of peritectically solidified Sm123, it was clarified that the constitutional supercooling must exist in the liquid when the 123 growth interface comes close to a 211 particle. It could also predict that larger 211 particle radius, smaller volume fraction of the 211 particles, larger growth rate, or smaller imposed temperature gradient cause easy occurrence of the constitutional supercooling. The growth rate and a 211 particle radius are determining parameters. Further consideration of the nucleation at the L/211 interface just ahead of the 123 growth front could describe the 123 growth morphological transition from with the planar interface to the equiaxed blocky.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cima, M. J., Flemings, M. C., Figueredo, A. M., Nakade, M., Ishii, H., Brody, H. D., and Haggerty, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 72 (1), 1 July, 179190 (1992)Google Scholar
2. Izumi, T., Nakamura, Y., and Shiohara, Y., J. Cryst. Growth 128, 757761 (1993)Google Scholar
3. Izumi, T., Nakamura, Y., and Shiohara, Y., J. Mat. Res. Vol.7, No. 7, July, 16211628 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Mori, N., and Ogi, K., J. Jpn. Inst. Metals, Vol.58, No. 12, 14441453 (1994)Google Scholar
5. Nakamura, Y. and Shiohara, Y., J. Mat. Res., Vol.11, No. 10, Oct., 24502457 (1996)Google Scholar
6. Sumida, M., Nakamura, Y., Shiohara, Y., and Umeda, T., J. Mater. Res., Vol.12, No. 8, Aug., 19791989 (1997)Google Scholar
7. Sumida, M., Matsuoka, S., Shiohara, Y., and Umeda, T., accepted in J. Mater. Res.Google Scholar
8. Athur, S. P., Selvamanickam, V., Balachandra, U. and Salama, K., J. Mater. Res., Vol.11, No. 12 Dec 29762989 (1996)Google Scholar
9. Czerwonka, J., and Eick, H.A., J. Sol. Stat. Chem. 90, 6978 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Krauns, Ch., Sumida, M., Tagami, M., Yamada, Y., and Shiohara, Y., Z. Phys. B 96, 207212(1994)Google Scholar
11. Morse, P.M., Feshbach, H., Theoretical Methods of Modern Physics Part 1 (McGraw-Hill Publishing, Tokyo), pp 1298 Google Scholar
12. Sumida, M., Shiohara, Y., and Umeda, T., preparing for submissionGoogle Scholar
13. Sumida, M., Tagami, M., Krauns, Ch., Shiohara, Y., and Umeda, T., Physica C 249, 4752 (1995)Google Scholar