Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:23:12.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Whitening fossils for photographic purposes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Rodney M. Feldmann*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242
Get access

Extract

The purpose of photographing fossils for study and for publication is to provide information regarding the morphology of the fossil. Typically, this morphology is expressed as topographic relief. Tonal patterns and color rarely serve to enhance the expression of morphology and may, instead, provide false information. As a result, it is desirable typically to eliminate, or reduce, the effects of variations in tonal pattern over the surface to be photographed to emphasize aspects of relief of the specimen and, therefore, actual expressions of morphology. Furthermore, uncoated specimens may be lustrous so that lighting the specimen for photography may produce undesirable highlights. A simple, and non-destructive, technique for whitening fossil specimens involves the application of ammonium chloride sublimate to the surface of the specimen (Figure 1). This coating is non-destructive, produces a uniform, nonlustrous white surface that enhances detail, and can be readily removed without damage to the specimen.

Type
Paleontological Illustration
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kier, P.M., Grant, R.E., and Yochelson, E.L. 1965. Whitening fossils, p. 453456. In Kummel, B. and Raup, D. (eds.), Handbook of Paleontological Techniques, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 852p.Google Scholar
Marsh, R.C., and Marsh, L.F. 1975. New techniques for coating paleontological specimens prior to photography. Journal of Paleontology, 49(3):565566.Google Scholar