We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2020
This paper follows up from a previous study on this topic and outlines the second part of a wider, two-part study on the information seeking behaviour (ISB) of law students. Exploratory work was outlined in a previous publication17 and there we found that although mobile technologies offered benefits to law students seeking information for their academic studies, there was concern from law librarians that the use of electronic resources via both non-mobile and mobile interfaces resulted in a loss of skills required for information retrieval due to the increasing capabilities of electronic resources’ search interfaces. To gain more insight into how law students were using mobile information resources, and better understand the advantages and disadvantages of such, we extended our study to a wider cohort and employed more research techniques including a focus group. This final phase of our study was conducted between 2015 to 2017. Here our cohort included another set of law librarians (13) and a further 54 law students. We expanded our research tools to include 2 thematic questionnaires and a focus group exercise. Our findings discovered that law librarians were concerned with the intangibility of digital formats. Law students remained indifferent to this aspect and valued the speed, multi-tasking and near-ubiquitous accessibility attributes that electronic format use via mobile technologies provided. These learnings and more, with conclusions, are reported in the course of this paper written by Zaki Abbas, Andrew MacFarlane and Lyn Robinson.
1 Peeples, Lyn, (2018). ‘Can't put down the phone? How smartphones are changing our brains—and lives’. Mach Online. https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/surprising-ways-smartphones-affect-our-brains-our-lives-ncna947566 accessed: 23 March 2019.
2 Barnard, Cathryn, (2019). ‘Our Future of Work Blog’. Working the Future Online. https://www.workingthefuture.com/blog accessed: 11 April 2019.
3 Abbas, Zaki, (2016). ‘#citylis Reflections and Research: Zaki Abbas on “Generations”’ – CityLIS News – Library & Information Science at City, University of London. https://blogs.city.ac.uk/citylis/2016/01/29/citylis-reflections-and-research-zaki-abbas-on-generations/#.WMpEYm_yipo accessed: 11 June 2019.
4 Abbas, Zaki, MacFarlane, Andrew., Robinson. Lyn., (2017). Use of Mobile Technologies by Law Students in the Law Library: an Exploratory Study, Legal Information Management, 17, pp 179–188. Doi:10.17/SI472669617000354. accessed: 20 September 2017.
5 Nikandia. Pradip. Ku., Singh. Karan., (2017). “Role of Mobile Technology and their Application in Library Services in Digital Era”. International Research : Journal of Library and Information Science; Aligarh Vol. 7, Iss. 1, (Mar 2017). accessed: 11 June 2019
6 Abdul Rafik, Sheik. (2017). Mobile Technologies for Academic Libraries: An Overview. accessed: 11 June 2019
7 Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and Cognition: A Review of Research Exploring the Links between Mobile Technology Habits and Cognitive Functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 605. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605 accessed: 12 June 2019
8 Kim, B, & Ball, M 2011, ‘Mobile Use in Medicine: Taking a Cue from Specialized Resources and Devices’, Reference Librarian, 52, 1/2, pp. 57–67, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, EBSCOhost, accessed: 9 May 2019
9 Chandel. A. S., Saikia. Mukesh., (2012). ‘Challenges and opportunities of e-resources’. Annals of Library and Information Studies. Vol. 59, September 2012, pp. 148.154. accessed: 28 May 2019.
10 Elliott. Naomi., Higgins. Agnes., (2012). ‘Surviving Grounded Theory Research Method in an Academic World: Proposal Writing and Theortical Frameworks’ Grounded Theory Review. An International Journal. Issue 2, December 2012, Volume 11. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2012/12/07/surviving-grounded-theory-research-method-in-an-academic-world-proposal-writing-and-theoretical-frameworks/ accessed: 24 May 2019
11 Bell. Lori., Peters. Thomas., (2013). ‘The handheld library: mobile technology and the librarian’ Librarians Unlimited. Copyright 2013. accessed: 19 May 2019
12 Singh, B.P.. (2018). Digital Transformation of library services in the Mobile World: The future trends. accessed: 19 May 2019
13 Leorke. Dale., Wyatt. Danielle., (2018). ‘Technology hasn't killed public libraries – it's inspired them to transform and stay relevant’. The Conversation Online. http://theconversation.com/technology-hasnt-killed-public-libraries-its-inspired-them-to-transform-and-stay-relevant-100900 accessed: 17 May 2019
14 Clarke. Georgia., (2018). ‘Libraries evolving to meet digital demands’. Government News Online. https://www.governmentnews.com.au/libraries-evolving-to-meet-digital-demands/ accessed: 14 May 2019
15 Osborne. Hilary., (2012). ‘Do you own your digital content?’ Guardian Online – Consumer rights. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2012/sep/03/do-you-own-your-digital-content accessed: 14 May 2019
16 Dieker. Nicole., (2016). ‘Think You Own the Songs and Movies You Buy on Apple and Amazon? Think Again’ The Penny Hoarder Online. https://www.thepennyhoarder.com/life/you-paid-for-your-digital-media-but-do-you-own-it/ accessed: 17 June 2019
17 Abbas. Zaki., MacFarlane. Andrew., Göker. Ayşe., (2014). ‘Smartphones for Law Students – Persuasive, Pervasive and Legal: a Research Study’. Legal Information Management, 14, pp 174–180. doi:10.1017/S1472669614000413. accessed: 11 May 2019
18 Abbas, Zaki., (2019). ‘Information Seeking Behaviour of Law Students; the impact of mobile devices on information seeking behaviour and provision in the 21st century’. City Research Online. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/21893/ accessed: 15 May 2019
19 Kent Milunovich, ‘Issues in Law Library Acquisitions: An Analysis’, 92 Law Library Journal 203 (2000). http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/faculty/352 accessed: 7 June 2019
20 Horava. Tony., (2010). ‘Challenges and Possibilities for Collection Management in a Digital Age’ ALCTS. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/lrts/article/view/5556/6837 accessed: 11 June 2019
21 Chandel. A. S., Saikia. Mukesh., (2012). ‘Challenges and opportunities of e-resources’. Annals of Library and Information Studies. Vol. 59, September 2012, pp. 148.154. accessed: 28 May 2019
22 Jacobs. Mark., (2007). ‘Electronic Resources Librarianship and Management of Digital Information’. Haworth Information Press, 2008. ISBN 078903218X, 9780789032188. accessed: 21 May 2019
23 Dieker. Nicole., (2016). ‘Think You Own the Songs and Movies You Buy on Apple and Amazon? Think Again’ The Penny Hoarder Online. https://www.thepennyhoarder.com/life/you-paid-for-your-digital-media-but-do-you-own-it/ accessed: 17 May 2019
24 North Carolina Consumers Council., (2016). ‘Do you Think That You Own Your Digital Content? Think Again’. https://www.ncconsumer.org/news-articles/do-you-think-that-you-own-your-digital-content-think-again.html accessed: 8 June 2019
25 Fellmeth. Aaron., (2016). ‘You Bought I, but You Don't Own It’. Slate Online – The Citizens Guide to the Future. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2016/10/the_uncertain_future_of_copyright_in_the_on_demand_age.html accessed: 19 June 2019
26 Makri. Stephann., Blandford. Ann., Cox. Anna. L., (2006). ‘Studying Law Students’ Information Seeking Behaviour to Inform the Design of Digital Law Libraries’ http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/5094/1/5094.pdf accessed: 7 June 2019
27 Danner. Richard. A., (1996). ‘Facing the Millenium: Law Schools, Law Librarians, and Information Technology’. Journal of Legal Education, Volumne 46, Number 1 (March 1996). http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 1029&context = faculty_scholarship accessed: 20 June 2019
28 Kroski. Ellyssa (2014) ‘Law Librarianship in the Digital Age’ pp217–pp219, Scarecrow Press, Inc. accessed: 19 June 2019
29 Parker-Pope, Tara., (2010). ‘An Ugly Toll of Technology: Impatience and Forgetfulness’. New York Times Online, Technology. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/07/technology/07brainside.html?mcubz = 0 accessed: 25 June 2019
30 Morin. Amy., (2015). ‘Waiting for a Reply? Study Explains The Psychology Behind Email Response Time’. Forbes Online, Entrepreneurs. https://www.forbes.com/sites/amymorin/2015/11/28/waiting-for-a-reply-study-explains-the-psychology-behind-email-response-time/#4209e4c19755 accessed: 19 May 2019
31 Matteson. Scott., (2014). ‘10 ways mobile devices are changing society – Humanity is evolving in many ways thanks to mobile devices’. TechRepublic Online. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/10-ways-mobile-devices-are-changing-society/ accessed: 3 June 2019
32 Mening. Robert., (2016). ‘Technology is Making us More Impatient. Here's What to Do’. https://www.engadget.com/2016/09/19/technology-is-making-us-more-impatient-heres-what-to-do/ accessed: 7 June 2019
33 Muther. Christopher., (2013). ‘Instant gratification is making us perpetually impatient’ Boston Globe Online. https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/style/2013/02/01/the-growing-culture-impatience-where-instant-gratification-makes-crave-more-instant-gratification/q8tWDNGeJB2mm45fQxtTQP/story.html accessed: 27 May 2019
34 Carr. Nicholas. G., (2013). ‘What *Should* We Be Worried About?’ Edge Online https://www.edge.org/response-detail/23721 accessed: 27 May 2019
35 UKCEN., (2017). ‘UK Clinical Ethics Network – Ethical Considerations. http://www.ukcen.net/ethical_issues/confidentiality/ethical_considerations accessed: 23 June 2019
36 Department of Computer Science Research Ethics Committee web page. https://www.city.ac.uk/about/schools/mathematics-computer-science-engineering/computer-science/research-ethics accessed: 1st August 2019
