Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T19:43:38.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurements of Grain-Boundary Inventories of 137Cs, 90Sr and 99Tc in Used Candu Fuel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

S. Stroes-Gascoyne
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE 1LO
J.C. Tait
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE 1LO
R.J. Porth
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE 1LO
J.L. Mcconnell
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE 1LO
T.R. Barnsdale
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE 1LO
S. Watson
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE 1LO
Get access

Abstract

Two methods were used to measure grain-boundary inventories of 137Cs, 90Sr and 99Tc in used CANDU fuel, to corroborate source term estimates based on a fission gas release code. Used fuels were partially oxidized at 200°C in air to overall compositions of UO2+x (0.15≤ × ≤0.25) to expose UO2 grain boundaries, followed by leaching in aqueous solution. Only a fraction (2 to 18%) of the calculated gap + grain-boundary inventories for 37Cs was released. This suggests that the calculations overestimate Cs release or that oxidation does not expose all grain boundaries, or that Cs release from grain boundaries is slow. Release of 90Sr (0.01 to 0.7%) agreed reasonably well with the source term estimates (0.001 to 0.3%). Release of 99Tc (0.3 to 1.5%) suggests that the source term estimate for the upper boundary of 99Tc release (25%) may be too high. A second technique involved leaching of crushed and size-fractionated used fuel in either a static or dynamic system. A direct one-to-one correlation between calculated and measured gap + grain-boundary inventories for 137Cs was found for low- and medium-power fuels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stroes-Gascoyne, S. and Sellinger, D.M., in Proc. First Int. Conf. on CANDU fuel, Chalk River, ON, Oct. 6-8, 1986 (Hastings, I.J., Ed.), 383 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H. and Sellinger, D.M., Nucl. Technol. 77 320 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Garisto, N.C., Johnson, L.H. and Hocking, W.H., in Proc. Second Int. Conf. on CANDU Fuel, Chalk River, ON, Oct. 1-5, 1989 (Hastings, I.J., Ed.), 352 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Gray, W.J. and Strachan, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 215 (1991)Google Scholar
5. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Tait, J.C., Wilkin, D.L., S. Watson and Porth, R.J., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-542 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Einziger, R.E., Thomas, L.E., Buchanan, H.C. and Stout, R.B., in Proc. 3 rd Int. Conf. on High Level Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada, April 12-16, 1992, 1449 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Taylor, P., Wood, D.D. and Duclos, A.M., J. Nucl. Mat. 189, 116 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Tucker, P.M., in Proc. Workshop on Chemical Reactivity of Oxide Fuels and Fission Product Release, April 7-9, 1987, CEGB, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, England (1987).Google Scholar
9. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H., Sellinger, D.M. and Wilkin, D.L., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10574 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Notley, M.J.F., Nucl. Technol. 44, 445 (1979).Google Scholar