Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:32:48.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tribological Properties of Sputter-Deposited MoS2 Films Containing Titanium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

James Krzanowski
Affiliation:
jamesk@cisunix.unh.edu, University of New Hampshire, Mechanical Engineering, 33 College Rd., Durham, NH, 03824, United States, 603-862-2315, 603-862-1865
Dyumani Nunna
Affiliation:
dnunna@unh.edu, University of New Hampshire, Mechanical Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

The tribological properties of sputter-deposited MoS2 and MoS2-Ti films were investigated in this study. The deposited films were characterized using microprobe analysis for composition and x-ray diffraction (XRD) for structure. The frictional properties of the films were examined using a pin-on-disk (POD) with counterfaces of 440C steel, aluminum, tungsten carbide and alumina. The tests were run under low (25%), medium (50%) and high (70%) humidity levels. MoS2 films without Ti were first examined under cyclic humidity conditions between 25 and 50% R/H. The results showed that for steel, WC and alumina counterfaces, the effect of the higher humidity was to increase the friction, but lower friction could be recovered when the humidity was reduced back to 25%. For films containing Ti, the best results were obtained at a concentration of 20 at. % Ti. These films performed well for steel and WC counterfaces, but poorly against aluminum. The effect of deposition temperature (up to 450oC) was examined for MoS2 and MoS2-5% Ti films. Higher temperatures yielded more crystalline films, but the addition of Ti partially countered this effect. The POD test showed that at medium humidity levels the friction decreased with temperature, but increased slightly when tested under low humidity. In all cases, the 5% Ti-containing films had a fiction coefficient of about 0.1 below that for films without Ti.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lince, J.R. and Fleischauer, P.D., J. Mater. Res. 2, 827 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Fleishauer, P.D. and Bauer, R., Tribol. Trans. 31, 239 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Donley, M.S., Murray, P.T., Barber, S.A., and Haas, T.W., Surf. Coat. Tech. 36, 329 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Simmonds, M.C., Savan, A., Pfluger, E. and Van Swygenhoven, H., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 19A, 609 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Walck, S.D., Donley, M.S., Zabinski, J.S. and Dyhouse, V.J., J. Mater. Res. 9, 236 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Zabinski, J.S., Donley, M.S., Walck, S.D., Schneider, T.R., and McDevitt, N.T., Trib. Trans. 38, 894 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Renevier, N.M., Oosterling, H., Konig, U., Dautzenberg, H., Kim, B.J., Geppert, L., Koopmans, F.G.M. and Leopold, J., Surf. Coat. Tech. 172, 13 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Renevier, N.M., Lobiondo, N., Fox, V.C., Teer, D.G., and Hampshire, J., Surf. Coat. Tech. 123, 84 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Fleischauer, P.D. and Lince, J.R., Trib. Intl. 32, 627 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Arslan, E., Bülbül, F., and Efeoglu, I., Trib. Trans. 47, 218 (2004).Google Scholar