Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:55:22.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE PRACTICE OF CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGE IN OMAN: PREVALENCE, TRENDS AND DETERMINANTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2012

M. MAZHARUL ISLAM
M. MAZHARUL ISLAM
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Sultan Qaboos University, Al Khoud, Sultanate of Oman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The practice of consanguineous marriage has been the culturally preferred form of marriage in most Arab and the Middle Eastern countries, including Oman, but due to a paucity of population-based data in the past there is a dearth of information about its form and dynamics in Oman. Recent national-level surveys allow this gap to be filled. This paper examines the prevalence, trends and determinants of consanguineous marriages in Oman using data from the 2000 Oman National Health Survey. The results indicate a very high prevalence of consanguineous marriage in Oman, as more than half (52%) of marriages are consanguineous. First cousin unions are the most common type of consanguineous unions, constituting 39% of all marriages and 75% of all consanguineous marriages. The study observed various patterns of consanguinity, some of them common with other Arab nations, and some unique in nature. Women's age at marriage, employment, place of childhood residence and geographical region appear to be significant determinants of consanguineous marriages. Consanguineous marriage shows a strong association with marital stability, early age at marriage and early-age childbearing. There has been no appreciable change in the prevalence of consanguineous unions in Oman over the last four decades despite massive socioeconomic development and modernization. However, recent marriage cohorts show slight declining trends. The results suggest that consanguinity is likely to remain stable in the future or decline at a slow rate. Specific health education and genetic counselling should be followed in line with WHO recommendations to minimize the negative health consequences of consanguinity for child health.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 44 , Issue 5 , September 2012 , pp. 571 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., McDonald, P. & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2008) Modernization or cultural maintenance: the practice of consanguineous marriage in Iran. Journal of Biosocial Science 40, 911–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Abdulkareem, A. A. & Ballal, S. G. (1998) Consanguineous marriage in an urban area of Saudi Arabia: rates and adverse health effects on the offspring. Journal of Community Health 23, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Arrayed, S. & Hamamy, H. (2011) The changing profile of consanguinity rates in Bahrain, 1990–2009. Journal of Biosocial Science. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932011000666.Google ScholarPubMed
Al-Awadi, S. A., Naguib, K. K., Moussa, M. A., Farag, T. I., Teebi, A. S. & El-Khalifa, M. Y. (1986) The effect of consanguineous marriages on reproductive wastage. Clinical Genetics 29, 384–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Gazali, L. I., Bener, A., Abdulrazzaq, Y. M., Micallef, R., Al-Khayat, A. I. & Gaber, T. (1997) Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Biosocial Science 29, 491–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Husain, M. & Al-Bunyan, M. (1997) Consanguineous marriages in a Saudi population and the effect of inbreeding on prenatal and postnatal mortality. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics 17, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Riyami, A., Afifi, M., Al-Kharusi, H. & Morsi, M. (2000) National Health Survey 2000. Volume 2. Reproductive Health Survey. Ministry of Health, Muscat.Google Scholar
Al-Riyami, A. & Afifi, M. (2003) Determinants of women's fertility in Oman. Saudi Medical Journal 24, 748–753.Google ScholarPubMed
Al-Thakeb, F. (1985) The Arab family and modernity: evidence from Kuwait. Current Anthropology 26, 575–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assaf, S. & Khawaja, M. (2009) Consanguinity trends and correlates in the Palestinian Territories. Journal of Biosocial Science 41, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbour, B. & Salameh, P. (2009) Consanguinity in Lebanon: prevalence, distribution and determinants. Journal of Biosocial Science 41, 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben, A. S., Masmoudi, S., Beltaief, N., Hachicha, S. & Ayadi, H. (2004) Consanguinity and endogamy in Northern Tunisia and its impact on nonsyndromic deafness. Genetic Epidemiology 27, 74–79.Google Scholar
Bener, A., Abdulrazzaq, M. Y., Al-Gazali, L. I., Micallef, R., Al-Khayat, A. I. & Gaber, T. (1996) Consanguinity and associated sociodemograhic factors in United Arab Emirates. Human Heredity 46, 256–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bener, A. & Alali, K. A. (2006) Consanguineous marriage in a newly developed country: the Qatari population. Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bener, A. & Hussain, R. (2006) Consanguineous unions and child health in the State of Qatar. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (1991) Consanguinity: a major variable in the study of North African reproductive behavior, morbidity and mortality? In Proceedings of the Demographic and Health Surveys World Conference, Vol. 1. Institute for Research Development, Washington, DC, pp. 321–341.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (1994) The role and significance of consanguinity as a demographic variable. Population and Development Review 20, 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (1995) When cousins marry: a review of consanguinity in the Middle East. Perspectives in Human Biology 1, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2001a) A Background Summary of Consanguineous Marriage. Center for Human Genetics, Edith Cowan University, Perth.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2001b) Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics 60, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2002) Endogamy, consanguinity and community genetics. Journal of Genetics 81, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2008) A community genetics perspective on consanguineous marriage. Community Genetics 11, 324–330.Google ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H., Grant, J. C. & Shami, S. A. (1993) Consanguinity as a determinant of reproductive behaviour and mortality in Pakistan. International Journal of Epidemiology 22, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H., Mason, W., Greene, J. & Rao, N. (1991) Reproductive behaviour and health in consanguineous marriages. Science 252, 789–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. & Neel, J. V. (1994) The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nature Genetics 8, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadhead, R. C. & Sehgal, K. C. (1981) Consanguinity and congenital anomalies in East Libya. Garyounis Medical Journal 4, 3–6.Google Scholar
Bundey, S. & Alam, H. (1995) A five-year prospective study of the health of children in different ethnic groups with particular reference to the effect of inbreeding. European Journal of Human Genetics 24, 1–15.Google Scholar
Dahl, T. S. (1997) The Muslim Family: A Study of Women's Rights in Islam. Scandinavian Universities Press, Oslo.Google Scholar
El-Mouzan, M. I., Al-Salloum, A. A., Al-Herbish, A. S., Qurachi, M. M. & Al-Omar, A. A. (2007) Regional variations in the prevalence of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 28, 1881–1884.Google ScholarPubMed
Eltigani, E. E. (2001) Levels and Trends in Fertility in Oman and Yemen. United Nations Population Division, UN/POP/PFD/2001/8. UNFPA, New York.Google Scholar
Gunaid, A. A., Hummad, N. A. & Tamim, K. A. (2004) Consanguineous marriage in the capital city Sana'a, Yemen. Journal of Biosocial Science 36, 111–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamamy, H., Al-Bayati, N. & Al-Kubaisy, W. (1986) Consanguineous marriages in Iraqi urban population and the effect on pregnancy outcome and infant mortality. Iraqi Medical Journal 34, 76–80.Google Scholar
Hamamy, H., Jamhawi, L., Al-Darawsheh, J. & Ajlouni, K. (2005) Consanguineous marriages in Jordan: why is the rate changing with time? Clinical Genetics 67, 511–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammami, A., Chalbi, N., Ben, A. M. & Elgazzeh, M. (2005) Effects of consanguinity and social factors on mortality and fertility in Mauritania. Tunisie Medicale 83, 221–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Hussain, R. & Bittles, A. H. (1999) Differentials in age at marriage, contraceptive use and fertility in consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science 31, 121–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, R. & Bittles, A. H. (2004) Assessment of association between consanguinity and fertility in Asian populations. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 22, 1–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Islam, M. M., Atsu, S. S. D. & Al-Qasmi, A. M. (2011) Proximate determinants of declining fertility in Oman. Canadian Studies in Population 38, 151–170.Google Scholar
Jaber, L., Halpern, G. J. & Shohat, M. (1998) The impact of consanguinity worldwide. Community Genetics 1, 12–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Jurdi, R. & Saxena, P. C. (2003) The prevalence and correlates of consanguineous marriage in Yemen: similarities and contrasts with other Arab countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 35, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khlat, M. (1988) Consanguineous marriages in Beirut: time trends, spatial distribution. Social Biology 35, 324–330.Google ScholarPubMed
Khlat, M. & Halabi, S. (1986) Modernization and consanguineous marriage in Beirut. Journal of Biosocial Science 18(4), 489–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoury, S. A. & Massad, D. (1992) Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. American Journal of Medical Genetics 43, 769–775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebel, R. R. (1983) Consanguinity studies in Wisconsin. I: secular trends in consanguineous marriages, 1843–1981. American Journal of Medical Genetics 15, 543–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lufti, J., Merlob, P., Xiangdong, B., Rotter, J. I. & Shohat, M. (1992) Marked parental consanguinity as a cause for increased major malformations in an Israeli Arab community. American Journal of Medical Genetics 41, 1–6.Google Scholar
Madhavan, T. & Narayan, J. (1991) Consanguinity and mental retardation. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 35, 133–139.Google ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Health (2010) Annual Health Report 2009: Muscat. Ministry of Health, Sultanate of Oman.Google Scholar
Ministry of National Economy (2010) Statistical Year Book 2009: Muscat. Ministry of National Economy, Sultanate of Oman.Google Scholar
Modell, B. & Darr, A. (2002) Science and society: genetic counselling and customary consanguineous marriage. Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 225–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mokhtar, M. M. & Abdel-Fattah, M. M. (2001) Consanguinity and advanced maternal age as risk factors for reproductive losses in Alexandria, Egypt. European Journal of Epidemiology 17, 559–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Othman, H. & Saadat, M. (2009) Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Syria. Journal of Biosocial Science 41, 685–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, J. (2002) The influence of consanguineous marriage on infant and child mortality among Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. Community Genetics 5, 178–181.Google Scholar
Radovanovic, Z., Shah, N. & Behbehani, J. (1999) Prevalence and social correlates of consanguinity in Kuwait. Annals of Saudi Medicine 19, 206–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajab, A., Freeman, N. V. & Patton, M. A. (1996) The frequency of posterior urethral valves in Oman. British Journal of Urology 77, 900–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajab, A., Freeman, N. V. & Patton, M. A. (1997) Hirschsprung's Disease in Oman. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 32, 724–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajab, A. & Patton, M. A. (1997) Major factors determining the frequencies of hemoglobinopathies in Oman. American Journal of Medical Genetics 71, 241–242.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajab, A. & Patton, M. A. (2000) A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Annals of Human Biology 27, 321–326.Google ScholarPubMed
Rajab, A., Vaishnav, A., Freeman, N. V. & Patton, M. A. (1998) Neural tube defects and congenital hydrocephalus in the Sultanate of Oman. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 44, 299–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rami, R. V. & Chandrasekhar, R. K. (1979) Consanguinity effects on fertility and mortality among the Reddis of Chittoor District (A.P.). Indian Journal of Heredity 11, 77–88.Google Scholar
Saadat, M. (2007) Consanguineous marriages in Iranian folktales. Community Genetics 10, 37–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Saha, N., Hamad, R. E. & Mohamed, S. (1990) Inbreeding effects on reproductive outcome in a Sudanese population. Human Heredity 40, 208–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoltenberg, C., Magnus, P., Skrondal, A. & Lie, R. T. (1999) Consanguinity and recurrence risk of stillbirth and infant death. American Journal of Public Health 89, 517–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sueyoshi, S. & Ohtsuka, R. (2003) Effects of polygyny and consanguinity on high fertility in the rural Arab population in South Jordan. Journal of Biosocial Science 35, 513–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sulaiman, A. J. M., Al-Riyami, A. & Farid, S. (2000) Oman Family Health Survey 1995. Final Report. Ministry of Health, Muscat.Google Scholar
Tadmouri, G. O., Nair, P., Obeid, T., Al Ali, M. T., Al Khaja, N. & Hamamy, H. A. (2009) Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reproductive Health 6, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talbi, J., Khadmaoui, A., Soulaymani, A. & Chafik, A. (2007) Study of consanguinity in Moroccan population. Influence on the profile of health. Antropo Revista de Antropologia fisica 15, 1–11.Google Scholar
United Nations (2008) United National World Population Prospects: 2008 Revision. United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (1998) Human Development Report, 1998. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Weinreb, A. A. (2008) Characteristics of women in consanguineous marriages in Egypt, 1988–2000. European Journal of Population 24, 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (2006) Medical Genetic Services in Developing Countries: The Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing and Screening. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Zaoui, S. & Biemont, C. (2002) Frequency of consanguineous unions in the Tlemcen area (West Algeria). Sante 12, 289–295.Google ScholarPubMed
Zurayk, H. (1979) The Changing Role of Arab Women. Population Bulletin of the United Nations Economic Commission for Western Asia, No. 17.Google Scholar