Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T05:16:28.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam (OQUA); preliminary results on the development of a general otologic questionnaire

Presenting Author: Paul Merkus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

Els Bruinewoud ,
Paul Merkus ,
Lisette van Leeuwen ,
Koen Viergever ,
Sophia Kramer ,
Elisabeth Laurens-Thalen ,
Rob van der Hulst  and
L.T. Rothuizen
Els Bruinewoud
Affiliation:
VU University Medical Center Amsterdam
Paul Merkus
Affiliation:
VU University Medical Center Amsterdam
Lisette van Leeuwen
Affiliation:
VU University Medical Center Amsterdam
Koen Viergever
Affiliation:
VU University Medical Center Amsterdam
Sophia Kramer
Affiliation:
VU University Medical Center Amsterdam
Elisabeth Laurens-Thalen
Affiliation:
Isala hospital
Rob van der Hulst
Affiliation:
Amstelland hospital
L.T. Rothuizen
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Medical Center
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstracts
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 130 , Supplement S3: Abstracts for the 10th International Conference on Cholesteatoma , May 2016 , pp. S84 - S85
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Learning Objectives: - Patient Related Outcome Measures are increasingly important in the evaluation of ear complaints. - Most patients with ear complaints suffer from multiple ear complaints or changing complaints after treatment. - The development and future implementation of a general otologic questionnaire will help to improve otologic care in all patients with ear complaints. - Multiple steps are needed to develop and validate a well-designed questionnaire.

Introduction: Most patients visiting an ENT-doctor because of an ear complaint suffer from multiple ear complaints. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are useful in the evaluation of these complaints. However, there is no well-validated, Dutch PROM available that contains items about all types of ear complaints.

Objectives: Development and validation of a questionnaire (OQUA), applicable to all adult patients visiting an ENT-doctor because of an ear complaint. The OQUA needs to cover all common ear complaints and all three parts of the questionnaire (severity, impact and change over time) must be able to be evaluated separately.

Methods: Patients over the age of sixteen who presented themselves to an ENT-doctor with an ear complaint were recruited for a series of studies. First, qualitative research through in depth interviews (N = 16) was carried out to identify the various domains of ear complaints. Then, a pilot study of the first and second draft of the OQUA (N = 32, N = 39) was performed. Finally, quantitative research was performed by field-testing (N = 352). Item reduction took place based on factor and reliability analyses.

Results: In the qualitative phase, eight domains of ear complaints were identified: earache, hearing loss, otorrhoea, dizziness, itch, tinnitus, pressure in ear and loss of taste. In the quantitative phase, ten out of fifty items were removed based on factor analysis, seventeen items were removed based on reliability analysis. Based on factor analysis, nine factors emerged. The current version of the OQUA comprises twenty-three items, covers all eight domains of ear complaints and contains eleven items about complaints that often occur in patients with cholesteatoma.

Conclusions: Many patients with an ear complaint report several ear complaints. The current version of the OQUA questionnaire serves as a good basis for the development of the final, validated version of this questionnaire.