Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:22:47.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Statewide Characterization of Hospital Infection Control Practices and Practitioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Anita L. Booth*
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Public Health and the Departments of Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
R. Mark Weeks
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Public Health and the Departments of Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
Robert H. Hutcheson Jr.
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Public Health and the Departments of Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
William Schaffner
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Public Health and the Departments of Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
*
Tennessee Department of Public Health, R.S. Gass Building, Ben Allen Road, Nashville, TN 37216

Abstract

Selected features of infection control programs among the 163 general hospitals in Tennessee were surveyed in 1976 and 1979. Each hospital but one had a designated infection control practitioner. Three-fourths of the hospitals had fewer than 200 beds and most were in rural areas. The practitioners in these small hospitals worked in an isolated professional milieu: few (4%) had attended a basic training course or were members of a national (11%) or local (16%) infection control association. They also had significantly less access to standard infection control resource publications than did practitioners in large hospitals. Use of aqueous quaternary ammonium compounds for disinfection was reported by 37% of all hospitals in 1979; 68% of hospitals routinely performed bacteriologic cultures of personnel or the environment. In contrast, only 3% of hospitals did not have a policy specifying the use of sterile closed-system drainage of indwelling bladder catheters. Although these practices varied somewhat by hospital size, the differences were not statistically significant. Modest improvement in each parameter was noted since 1976. Pathology was the most common medical specialty (34%) among chairman of infection control committees; internal medicine and pediatrics accounted for only 13%. The practice of routine microbiologic monitoring was significantly more common among hospitals with chairmen who were pathologists. The implications of these findings for national priorities in hospital infection control are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cerner for Disease Control. Infection surveillance and control programs in U.S. hospitals: An assessment, 1976. Morbid Mortal Weekly Report 1978;27:139-45.Google Scholar
2.Haley, RW: The “Hospital epidemiologist” in U.S. hospitals, 1976-1977: A description of the head of the infection surveillance and control program. Report from the SENIC project. Infection Control 1980;1:2132.Google Scholar
3.Dixon, RE, Kaslow, RA, Mackel, DCet al. Aqueous quaternary ammonium antiseptics and disinfectants. Use and misuse. JAMA 1976;236:2415-17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Committee on Infections Within Hospitals, American Hospital Association. Statement on microbiologic sampling in the hospital. Hospitals. J Am Hosp Assn 1974;48:125-26.Google Scholar
5.Wenzel, RP, Osterman, CA, Townsend, TRet al. Development of a statewide program for surveillance and reporting of hospital-acquired infections. J Infect Dis 1979;140:741-46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Brill, MR, Burke, JP, Nordquisl, AGet al. Infection control in small hospitals, Prevalence surveys in 18 institutions. JAMA 1976;236:1700-03.Google Scholar
7.Brill, MR. Infectious diseases in small hospitals. Prevalence of infections and adequacy of microbiology services. Ann Int Med 1978;89(Part 2):757-60.Google Scholar
8.Owen, JA. Editorial: Doclor on a while horse. Hosp Formulary 1979;14:957.Google Scholar
9.Eickhoff, TC. Standards for hospital infection control. Ann Int Med 1978;89(Part 2):829-31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed